CONDENSED MATTER: ELECTRONIC STRUCTURE, ELECTRICAL, MAGNETIC, AND OPTICAL PROPERTIES |
Prev
Next
|
|
|
Comparative study on characteristics of Si-based AlGaN/GaN recessed MIS-HEMTs with HfO2 and Al2O3 gate insulators |
Yao-Peng Zhao(赵垚澎), Chong Wang(王冲), Xue-Feng Zheng(郑雪峰), Xiao-Hua Ma(马晓华), Kai Liu(刘凯), Ang Li(李昂), Yun-Long He(何云龙), Yue Hao(郝跃) |
Key Laboratory of Wide Band-Gap Semiconductor Materials and Devices, School of Microelectronics, Xidian University, Xi'an 710071, China |
|
|
Abstract Two types of enhancement-mode (E-mode) AlGaN/GaN metal-insulator-semiconductor high-electron-mobility transistors (MIS-HEMTs) with different gate insulators are fabricated on Si substrates. The HfO2 gate insulator and the Al2O3 gate insulator each with a thickness of 30 nm are grown by the plasma-enhanced atomic layer deposition (PEALD). The energy band diagrams of two types of dielectric MIS-HEMTs are compared. The breakdown voltage (VBR) of HfO2 dielectric layer and Al2O3 dielectric layer are 9.4 V and 15.9 V, respectively. With the same barrier thickness, the transconductance of MIS-HEMT with HfO2 is larger. The threshold voltage (Vth) of the HfO2 and Al2O3 MIS-HEMT are 2.0 V and 2.4 V, respectively, when the barrier layer thickness is 0 nm. The C-V characteristics are in good agreement with the Vth's transfer characteristics. As the barrier layer becomes thinner, the drain current density decreases sharply. Due to the dielectric/AlGaN interface is very close to the channel, the scattering of interface states will lead the electron mobility to decrease. The current collapse and the Ron of Al2O3 MIS-HEMT are smaller at the maximum gate voltage. As Al2O3 has excellent thermal stability and chemical stability, the interface state density of Al2O3/AlGaN is less than that of HfO2/AlGaN.
|
Received: 18 March 2020
Revised: 24 April 2020
Accepted manuscript online:
|
PACS:
|
73.40.Kp
|
(III-V semiconductor-to-semiconductor contacts, p-n junctions, and heterojunctions)
|
|
73.40.Rw
|
(Metal-insulator-metal structures)
|
|
73.40.Qv
|
(Metal-insulator-semiconductor structures (including semiconductor-to-insulator))
|
|
73.61.Ey
|
(III-V semiconductors)
|
|
Fund: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 61974111, 11690042, and 61974115), the National Pre-research Foundation of China (Grant No. 31512050402), and the Fund of Innovation Center of Radiation Application, China (Grant No. KFZC2018040202). |
Corresponding Authors:
Chong Wang, Chong Wang
E-mail: chongw@xidian.edu.cn;xfzheng@mail.xidian.edu.cn
|
Cite this article:
Yao-Peng Zhao(赵垚澎), Chong Wang(王冲), Xue-Feng Zheng(郑雪峰), Xiao-Hua Ma(马晓华), Kai Liu(刘凯), Ang Li(李昂), Yun-Long He(何云龙), Yue Hao(郝跃) Comparative study on characteristics of Si-based AlGaN/GaN recessed MIS-HEMTs with HfO2 and Al2O3 gate insulators 2020 Chin. Phys. B 29 087304
|
[1] |
Hua M Y, Wei J, Krishnamoorthy S, Bao Q L, Zhang Z F, Zheng Z Y and Chen Kevin J 2018 IEEE T. Electron. Dev. 39 413
|
[2] |
Nifa I, Leroux C, Torres A, Charles M, Reimbold G, Ghibaudo G and Bano E 2019 Microelectron. Eng. 215 110976
|
[3] |
Fei X X, Wang Y, Luo X, Cao F and Yu C H 2018 Superlattice Microst. 114 314
|
[4] |
Garcia F, Shamsir S and Islam S K 2019 Solid-State Electron. 151 52
|
[5] |
Shi Y J, Huang S, Bao Q L, Wang X H, Wei K, Jiang H J, Li J F, Zhao C, Li S M, Zhou Y, Gao H W, Sun Q, Yang H, Zhang J H, Chen W J, Zhou Q, Zhang B and Liu X Y 2016 IEEE T. Electron. Dev. 63 614
|
[6] |
Wang H Y, Wang J Y, Li M J, Cao Q R, Yu M, He Y D and Wu W G 2018 IEEE Electron Dev. Lett. 39 1888
|
[7] |
Liu S, Cai Y, Gu G, Wang J, Zeng C, Shi W, Feng Z, Qin H, Cheng Z, Chen K J and Zhang B 2012 IEEE Electron Dev. Lett. 33 354
|
[8] |
He J B, Hua M Y, Zhang Z F and Chen J K 2018 IEEE T. Electron. Dev. 65 3185
|
[9] |
Hashizume T, Nishiguchi K, Kaneki S, Kuzmik J and Yatabe Z 2018 Mater. Sci. Semicond. Proc. 78 85
|
[10] |
Long R D, Jackson C M, Yang J, Hazeghi A, Hitzman C, Majety S, Arehart A R, Nishi Y, Ma T P, Ringel S A and Mclntyre P C 2013 Appl. Phys. Lett. 103 201607
|
[11] |
Liu C, Chor E F and Tan L S 2006 Appl. Phys. Lett. 88 173504
|
[12] |
Kanamura M, Ohki T, Kikkawa T, Imanishi K, Imada T, Yamada A and Hara N 2010 IEEE Electron Dev. Lett. 31 189
|
[13] |
Huang S, Yang S, Roberts J and Chen K J 2011 Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 50 110202
|
[14] |
Choi W, Seok O, Ryu H, Cha H and Seo K 2014 IEEE Electron Dev. Lett. 35 175
|
[15] |
Zhao Y P, Wang C, Zheng X F, Ma X H, He Y L, Liu K, Li A, Peng Y, Zhang C F and Hao Y 2020 Phys. Status Solidi A 217 1900981
|
[16] |
Tapajna M and Kuzmik J 2012 Appl. Phys. Lett. 100 113509
|
[17] |
Chou B Y, Hsu W C, Liu H Y, Ho C S and Lee C S 2013 Semicond. Sci. Technol. 28 074005
|
[18] |
Yoon Y J, Kang H S, Seo J H, Kim Y J, Bae J H, Lee J H, Kang I M and Cho S J 2014 J. Korean Phys. Soc. 65 1579
|
[19] |
Zhao Y P, Wang C, Zheng X F, Ma X H, He Y L, Liu K, Li A, Peng Y, Zhang C F and Hao Y 2020 Solid-State Electron. 163 107649
|
[20] |
Zhu J J, Ma X H, Xie Y, Hou B Chen W W, Zhang J C and Hao Y 2015 IEEE T. Electron. Dev. 62 512
|
[21] |
He Y L, Gao H, Wang C, Zhao Y P, Lu X L, Zhang C F, Zheng X F, Guo L X, Ma X H and Hao Y 2019 Phys. Status Solidi A 216 1900115
|
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|