|
Special Issue:
SPECIAL TOPIC — Emerging photovoltaic materials and devices
|
| SPECIAL TOPIC—Emerging photovoltaic materials and devices |
Prev
Next
|
|
|
Sputtered SnO2 as an interlayer for efficient semitransparent perovskite solar cells |
| Zheng Fang(方正)1,2,†, Liu Yang(杨柳)2,†, Yongbin Jin(靳永斌)2,†, Kaikai Liu(刘凯凯)2, Huiping Feng(酆辉平)2, Bingru Deng(邓冰如)2, Lingfang Zheng(郑玲芳)2, Changcai Cui(崔长彩)1, Chengbo Tian(田成波)2, Liqiang Xie(谢立强)2,‡, Xipeng Xu(徐西鹏)1,§, and Zhanhua Wei(魏展画)2,¶ |
1 MOE Engineering Research Center for Brittle Materials Machining, Institute of Manufacturing Engineering, College of Mechanical Engineering and Automation, Huaqiao University, Xiamen 361021, China;
2 Xiamen Key Laboratory of Optoelectronic Materials and Advanced Manufacturing, Institute of Luminescent Materials and Information Displays, College of Materials Science and Engineering, Huaqiao University, Xiamen 361021, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract SnO2 is widely used as the electron transport layer (ETL) in perovskite solar cells (PSCs) due to its excellent electron mobility, low processing temperature, and low cost. And the most common way of preparing the SnO2 ETL is spin-coating using the corresponding colloid solution. However, the spin-coated SnO2 layer is sometimes not so compact and contains pinholes, weakening the hole blocking capability. Here, a SnO2 thin film prepared through magnetron-sputtering was inserted between ITO and the spin-coated SnO2 acted as an interlayer. This strategy can combine the advantages of efficient electron extraction and hole blocking due to the high compactness of the sputtered film and the excellent electronic property of the spin-coated SnO2. Therefore, the recombination of photo-generated carriers at the interface is significantly reduced. As a result, the semitransparent perovskite solar cells (with a bandgap of 1.73 eV) based on this double-layered SnO2 demonstrate a maximum efficiency of 17.7% (stabilized at 17.04%) with negligible hysteresis. Moreover, the shelf stability of the device is also significantly improved, maintaining 95% of the initial efficiency after 800-hours of aging.
|
Received: 04 March 2022
Revised: 13 April 2022
Accepted manuscript online: 18 April 2022
|
|
PACS:
|
88.40.H-
|
(Solar cells (photovoltaics))
|
| |
88.40.hj
|
(Efficiency and performance of solar cells)
|
|
| Fund: This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 22179042, U21A2078, and 51902110), the Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province, China (Grant Nos. 2020J06021, 2019J01057, and 2020J01064), Scientific Research Funds of Huaqiao University, and Promotion Program for Young and Middle-aged Teacher in Science and Technology Research of Huaqiao University (Grant Nos. ZQN-PY607 and ZQN-806). |
Corresponding Authors:
Liqiang Xie, Xipeng Xu, Zhanhua Wei
E-mail: lqxie@hqu.edu.cn;xpxu@hqu.edu.cn;weizhanhua@hqu.edu.cn
|
Cite this article:
Zheng Fang(方正), Liu Yang(杨柳), Yongbin Jin(靳永斌), Kaikai Liu(刘凯凯), Huiping Feng(酆辉平), Bingru Deng(邓冰如), Lingfang Zheng(郑玲芳), Changcai Cui(崔长彩), Chengbo Tian(田成波), Liqiang Xie(谢立强), Xipeng Xu(徐西鹏), and Zhanhua Wei(魏展画) Sputtered SnO2 as an interlayer for efficient semitransparent perovskite solar cells 2022 Chin. Phys. B 31 118801
|
[1] Kojima A, Teshima K, Shirai Y and Miyasaka T 2009 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131 6050
[2] Lee M M, Teuscher J, Miyasaka T, Murakami T N and Snaith H J 2012 Science 338 643
[3] Yang Woon S, Noh Jun H, Jeon Nam J, Kim Young C, Ryu S, Seo J and Seok Sang I 2015 Science 348 1234
[4] Saliba M, Matsui T, Seo J Y, Domanski K, Correa-Baena J P, Nazeeruddin M K, Zakeeruddin S M, Tress W, Abate A, Hagfeldt A and Grätzel M 2016 Energy Environ. Sci. 9 1989
[5] Jiang Q, Zhao Y, Zhang X, Yang X, Chen Y, Chu Z, Ye Q, Li X, Yin Z and You J 2019 Nat. Photon. 13 460
[6] Kim G, Min H, Lee Kyoung S, Lee Do Y, Yoon So M and Seok Sang I 2020 Science 370 108
[7] Min H, Lee D Y, Kim J, Kim G, Lee K S, Kim J, Paik M J, Kim Y K, Kim K S, Kim M G, Shin T J and Il Seok S 2021 Nature 598 444
[8] National Renewable Energy Laboratory 2021 Research Cell Efficiency Records (accessed March 20, 2021)
[9] Jiang Q, Zhang L, Wang H, Yang X, Meng J, Liu H, Yin Z, Wu J, Zhang X and You J 2016 Nat. Energy 2 16177
[10] Bu T, Li J, Zheng F, Chen W, Wen X, Ku Z, Peng Y, Zhong J, Cheng Y B and Huang F 2018 Nat. Commun. 9 4609
[11] Jeong J, Kim M, Seo J, et al. 2021 Nature 592 381
[12] Wei J, Guo F, Wang X, Xu K, Lei M, Liang Y, Zhao Y and Xu D 2018 Adv. Mater. 30 1805153
[13] Correa Baena J P, Steier L, Tress W, Saliba M, Neutzner S, Matsui T, Giordano F, Jacobsson T J, Srimath Kandada A R, Zakeeruddin S M, Petrozza A, Abate A, Nazeeruddin M K, Grätzel M and Hagfeldt A 2015 Energy Environ. Sci. 8 2928
[14] Yang D, Yang R, Wang K, Wu C, Zhu X, Feng J, Ren X, Fang G, Priya S and Liu S 2018 Nat. Commun. 9 3239
[15] Xi J, Wu Z, Jiao B, Dong H, Ran C, Piao C, Lei T, Song T B, Ke W, Yokoyama T, Hou X and Kanatzidis M G 2017 Adv. Mater. 29 1606964
[16] Bu T, Li J, Zheng F, Chen W, Wen X, Ku Z, Peng Y, Zhong J, Cheng Y B and Huang F 2018 Nat. Commun. 9 4609
[17] Zhu M, Liu W, Ke W, Xie L, Dong P and Hao F 2019 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11 666
[18] Zhang M, Wu F, Chi D, Shi K and Huang S 2020 Mater. Adv. 1 617
[19] Chen J Y, Chueh C C, Zhu Z, Chen W C and Jen A K Y 2017 Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 164 47
[20] Qiu L, Liu Z, Ono L K, Jiang Y, Son D Y, Hawash Z, He S and Qi Y 2019 Adv. Functi. Mater. 29 1806779
[21] Yoo J J, Seo G, Chua M R, Park T G, Lu Y, Rotermund F, Kim Y K, Moon C S, Jeon N J, Correa-Baena J P, Bulovi? V, Shin S S, Bawendi M G and Seo J 2021 Nature 590 587
[22] Raiford J A, Boyd C C, Palmstrom A F, Wolf E J, Fearon B A, Berry J J, McGehee M D and Bent S F 2019 Adv. Energy Mater. 9 1902353
[23] Zhao Y, Deng Q, Guo R, Wu Z, Li Y, Duan Y, Shen Y, Zhang W and Shao G 2020 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 12 54904
[24] Bai G, Wu Z, Li J, Bu T, Li W, Li W, Huang F, Zhang Q, Cheng Y B and Zhong J 2019 Sol. Energy 183 306
[25] Lee Y, Lee S, Seo G, Paek S, Cho K T, Huckaba A J, Calizzi M, Choi D W, Park J S, Lee D, Lee H J, Asiri A M and Nazeeruddin M K 2018 Adv. Sci. 5 1800130
[26] Jeong S, Seo S, Park H and Shin H 2019 Chem. Commun. 55 2433
[27] Dagar J, Castro H S, Gasbarri M, Palma A L, Cina L, Matteocci F, Calabr E, Di C A and Brown T M 2018 Nano Research 11 2669
[28] Wu W Q, Chen D, Cheng Y B and Caruso R A 2017 Solar RRL 1 1700117
[29] Ke W, Zhao D, Xiao C, Wang C, Cimaroli A J, Grice C R, Yang M, Li Z, Jiang C S, Al-Jassim M, Zhu K, Kanatzidis M G, Fang G and Yan Y 2016 J. Mater. Chem. A 4 14276
[30] Noh Y W, Jin I S, Kim K S, Park S H and Jung J W 2020 J. Mater. Chem. A 8 17163
[31] Song P, Shen L, Zheng L, Liu K, Tian W, Chen J, Luo Y, Tian C, Xie L and Wei Z 2021 Nano Select. 2 1779
[32] Xie L, Lin K, Lu J, Feng W, Song P, Yan C, Liu K, Shen L, Tian C and Wei Z 2019 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141 20537
[33] Wang W G, Bai T, Xue G F and Ye M D 2021 J. Electrochem. 27 216 |
| No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|
