| INTERDISCIPLINARY PHYSICS AND RELATED AREAS OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY |
Prev
Next
|
|
|
Performance analysis of an in-built N+ pocket electrically doped TFET biosensor for biomedical applications |
| Chan Shan(单婵)1, Qian-nan Wang(王倩楠)1, and Ying Liu(刘赢)2,3,† |
1 School of Ocean Information Engineering, Jimei University, Xiamen 361021, China; 2 Faculty of Data Science and Information Technology, INTI International University, Negeri Sembilan, 71800, Malaysia; 3 School of Software, Quanzhou University of Information Engineering, Quanzhou 362008, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract An in-built N$^{+}$ pocket electrically doped tunnel field-effect transistor (ED-TFET)-based biosensor has been reported for the first time. The proposed device begins with a PN junction structure with a control gate (CG) and two polarity gates (PG1 and PG2). Utilizing the polarity bias concept, a narrow N$^{+}$ pocket is formed between the source and channel without the need for additional doping steps, achieved through biasing PG1 and PG2 at $-1.2 $ V and 1.2 V, respectively. This method not only addresses issues related to doping control but also eliminates constraints associated with thermal budgets and simplifies the fabrication process compared to traditional TFETs. To facilitate biomolecule sensing within the device, a nanogap cavity is formed in the gate dielectric by selectively etching a section of the polarity gate dielectric layer toward the source side. The investigation into the presence of neutral and charged molecules within the cavities has been conducted by examining variations in the electrical properties of the proposed biosensor. Key characteristics assessed include drain current, energy band, and electric field distribution. The performance of the biosensor is measured using various metrics such as drain current ($I_{\rm DS}$), subthreshold swing (SS), threshold voltage ($V_{\rm TH}$), drain current ratio ($I_{\rm ON}/I_{\rm OFF}$). The proposed in-built N$^{+}$ pocket ED-TFET-based biosensor reaches a peak sensitivity of 1.08$\times10^{13}$ for a neutral biomolecule in a completely filled nanogap with a dielectric constant of 12. Additionally, the effects of cavity geometry and different fill factors (FFs) on sensitivity are studied.
|
Received: 30 April 2025
Revised: 12 June 2025
Accepted manuscript online: 08 July 2025
|
|
PACS:
|
87.85.fk
|
(Biosensors)
|
| |
85.30.Tv
|
(Field effect devices)
|
| |
85.30.De
|
(Semiconductor-device characterization, design, and modeling)
|
| |
85.30.Mn
|
(Junction breakdown and tunneling devices (including resonance tunneling devices))
|
|
| Fund: Project supported by the Ministry of Education’s Supply and Demand Matching Employment and Education Project (Grant No. 2024110776329). |
Corresponding Authors:
Ying Liu
E-mail: liuying@foxmail.com
|
Cite this article:
Chan Shan(单婵), Qian-nan Wang(王倩楠), and Ying Liu(刘赢) Performance analysis of an in-built N+ pocket electrically doped TFET biosensor for biomedical applications 2026 Chin. Phys. B 35 028703
|
[1] Gao A, Lu N, Wang W and Li T 2016 Sci. Rep. 6 225546 [2] Im H, Huang X, Gu B and Choi Y 2007 Nat. Nanotechnol. 2 430 [3] Reddy N N and Panda D K 2021 Silicon 13 3085 [4] Hemaja V and Panda D K 2022 Silicon 4 1873 [5] Tayal S, Majumdar B, Bhattacharya S and Kanungo S 2023 IEEE Trans. NanoBiosci. 22 174 [6] Bhalla N, Pan Y, Yang Z and Payam A F 2020 ACS Nano 4 7783 [7] Bitra J and Komanapalli G 2023 Sensing and Imaging 24 28 [8] Wangkheirakpam V D and Bhowmick B and Pukhrambam P D 2020 IEEE Trans. Nanotechnol. 19 156 [9] DeviWV, Bhowmick B and Pukhrambam P D 2020 IEEE Trans. Electron Dev. 67 2133 [10] Bitra J and Komanapalli G 2023 IEEE Trans. Elect. Electron. Mater. 24 365 [11] Das D and Pandey C K 2024 Micro Nanostruct. 190 207825 [12] Pathakamuri A K, Pandey C K and Ghosh P 2024 Microsyst. Technol. [13] Ashok T and Pandey C K 2024 Microelectron. J. 144 106071 [14] Gorla K and Pandey C K 2024 Aeu-int J. Electron C 177 155229 [15] Gorla K and Pandey C K 2025 Micro Nanostruct. 198 208060 [16] Nagavarapu V, Jhaveri R and Woo J C S 2008 IEEE Trans. Electron Dev. 55 1013 [17] Cao W, Yao C J, Jiao G F, Huang D, Yu H Y and Li M F 2011 IEEE Trans. Electron Dev. 58 2122 [18] Li J, Liu Y, Wei S F and Shan C 2020 Micromachines 11 960 [19] Lahgere A, Sahu C and Singh J 2015 IEEE Trans. Electron Dev. 62 2404 [20] Tirkey S, Sharma D, Yadav D S and Yadav S 2017 IEEE Trans. Electron Dev. 64 3943 [21] Abdi D B and Kumar M J 2014 IEEE Electron Dev. Lett. 35 1170 [22] Colloc’h N, Hajji M, Bachet B, L’Hermite G, Schiltz M, Prangé T, Castro B and Mornon J P 1997 Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 4 947 [23] Kuzuya A, Numajiri K, Kimura M and Komiyama M 2008 Nucleic Acids Symp. Ser. 52 681 [24] Kim S, Baek D, Kim J Y, Choi S J, Seol M L and Choi Y K 2012 Appl. Phys. Lett. 101 073703 [25] Acharya B and Mishra G P 2020 IEEE Sensor. J. 20 13969 [26] Nigam K K, Yadav P and Tikkiwal V A 2024 Micro Nanostruct. 191 207844 [27] Anvarifard M K, Ramezani Z, Amiri I S and Nejad A M 2020 Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process 107 104849 [28] Ramezani Z and Orouji A A 2017 J. Electron. Mater. 46 2269 [29] Marchi M, Sacchetto D, Frache S, Zhang J, Gaillardon P E, Leblebici Y and De Micheli G 2012 2012 IEDM Tech. Dig. 8.4.1 [30] Kondavitee G S, Kumar R A and Karumuri S R 2025 IEEE Sensor. J. 25 3444 [31] Min K S, Kang C Y, Park C, Park C S, Park B J, Park J B, Hussain M M, Lee J C, Lee B H, Kirsch P, Tseng H H, Jammy R and Yeom G Y 2009 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM), December 07–09, 2009, Baltimore, MD, USA, p. 1 [32] Silvaco Inc. 2018 ATLAS User’s Manual (Santa Clara, CA: Silvaco Inc.) http://www.silvaco.com [33] Omura Y, Horiguchi S, Tabe M and Kishi K 1993 IEEE Electron Dev. Lett. 14 569 [34] Wang P F, Hilsenbeck K, Nirschl Th, Oswald M, Stepper Ch, Weis M, Schmitt-Landsiedel D and Hansch W2004 Solid-State Electron. 48 2281 [35] Venkatesh P, Nigam K, Pandey S, Sharma D and Kondekar P N 2017 Superlattices Microstruct. 109 470 [36] Singh Km S, Kumar S and Nigam K 2021 IEEE Trans. Electron Dev. 68 5784 [37] Iqbal M Y, Alam M S, Anand S and Amin S I 2022 IEEE Trans. Nanotechnol. 21 251 [38] Gedam A, Acharya B and Mishra G P 2021 IEEE Sensor. J. 21 16761 [39] Bind M K and Nigam K K 2024 IEEE Sensor. J. 24 24023 [40] Jia H, Zhao L and Su Q 2024 Micro Nanostruct. 194 207931 [41] Mahoodi M and Hosseini S E 2025 Aeu-int J. Electron C 188 155568 [42] Kumar R A, Kondavitee G S,Wadhwa G and Karumuri S R 2024 IEEE Sensor. J. 24 37923 [43] Cherik I C and Mohammadi S 2022 IEEE Sensor. J. 22 10308 [44] Harika P, Kondavitee G S and Karumuri S R 2025 IEEE Trans. NanoBiosci. 24 25 |
| No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|