SPECIAL TOPIC — Computational programs in complex systems |
Prev
Next
|
|
|
Impact of message fatigue and individual behavioral responses on epidemiological spread in temporal simplicial networks |
Xiao-Nan Fan(樊晓楠) and Xuemei You(由雪梅)† |
Business School, Shandong Normal University, Jinan 250014, China |
|
|
Abstract Health information spreads rapidly, which can effectively control epidemics. However, the swift dissemination of information also has potential negative impacts, which increasingly attracts attention. Message fatigue refers to the psychological response characterized by feelings of boredom and anxiety that occur after receiving an excessive amount of similar information. This phenomenon can alter individual behaviors related to epidemic prevention. Additionally, recent studies indicate that pairwise interactions alone are insufficient to describe complex social transmission processes, and higher-order structures representing group interactions are crucial. To address this, we develop a novel epidemic model that investigates the interactions between information, behavioral responses, and epidemics. Our model incorporates the impact of message fatigue on the entire transmission system. The information layer is modeled using a static simplicial network to capture group interactions, while the disease layer uses a time-varying network based on activity-driven model with attractiveness to represent the self-protection behaviors of susceptible individuals and self-isolation behaviors of infected individuals. We theoretically describe the co-evolution equations using the microscopic Markov chain approach (MMCA) and get the epidemic threshold. Experimental results show that while the negative impact of message fatigue on epidemic transmission is limited, it significantly weakens the group interactions depicted by higher-order structures. Individual behavioral responses strongly inhibit the epidemic. Our simulations using the Monte Carlo (MC) method demonstrate that greater intensity in these responses leads to clustering of susceptible individuals in the disease layer. Finally, we apply the proposed model to real networks to verify its reliability. In summary, our research results enhance the understanding of the information-epidemic coupling dynamics, and we expect to provide valuable guidance for managing future emerging epidemics.
|
Received: 26 November 2024
Revised: 03 January 2025
Accepted manuscript online: 16 January 2025
|
PACS:
|
87.19.X-
|
(Diseases)
|
|
02.50.Ga
|
(Markov processes)
|
|
02.70.Uu
|
(Applications of Monte Carlo methods)
|
|
05.10.-a
|
(Computational methods in statistical physics and nonlinear dynamics)
|
|
Fund: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 72171136 and 72134004), Humanities and Social Science Research Project, Ministry of Education of China (Grant No. 21YJC630157), the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (Grant No. ZR2022MG008), and Shandong Provincial Colleges and Universities Youth Innovation Technology of China (Grant No. 2022RW066). |
Corresponding Authors:
Xuemei You
E-mail: youxuemei@sdnu.edu.cn
|
Cite this article:
Xiao-Nan Fan(樊晓楠) and Xuemei You(由雪梅) Impact of message fatigue and individual behavioral responses on epidemiological spread in temporal simplicial networks 2025 Chin. Phys. B 34 038703
|
[1] Jones K E, Patel N G, Levy M A, et al. 2008 Nature 451 990 [2] Berche P 2022 Presse Med. 51 104117 [3] Berche P 2022 Presse Med. 51 104127 [4] Stone B M and Wang V 2023 J. Affect. Disord. Rep. 11 100479 [5] Laing A G, Lorenc A, Del Molino, et al. 2020 Nat. Med. 26 1623 [6] Newman M E J 2003 SIAM Rev. 45 167 [7] Pastor-Satorras R and Vespignani A 2002 Phys. Rev. E 65 036104 [8] Hu X, Chen J and Xia C 2024 Chin. Phys. B 33 100202 [9] Yin Q, Wang Z and Xia C 2023 Nonlinear Dyn. 111 14583 [10] Liu Y, Sanhedrai H, Dong G, et al. 2020 Natl. Sci. Rev. 8 nwaa229 [11] Funk S, Gilad E and Jansen V A A 2010 J. Theor. Biol. 264 501 [12] Granell C, Gomez S and Arenas A 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 128701 [13] Xie X and Huo L 2024 Chaos, Solitons & Fractals 181 114586 [14] Sun Q, Wang Z, Zhao D, et al. 2022 Chaos, Solitons & Fractals 164 112734 [15] Li L, Dong G, Zhu H, et al. 2024 Appl. Math. Comput. 472 128617 [16] Wang Z, Xia C, Chen Z, et al. 2021 IEEE Trans. Cybern. 51 1454 [17] Xia C, Wang Z, Zheng C, et al. 2019 Inf. Sci. 471 185 [18] Peng P, Fan T and Lü L 2024 Entropy 26 248 [19] Benson A R, Gleich D F and Leskovec J 2016 Science 353 163 [20] Huang S, Chen J, Li M Y, et al. 2024 Chin. Phys. B 33 030205 [21] Iacopini I, Petri G, Barrat A, et al. 2019 Nat. Commun. 10 2485 [22] Wang H, Zhang H F, Zhu P C, et al. 2022 Chaos 32 083110 [23] Zhang K, Hong X, Han Y, et al. 2024 Chaos, Solitons & Fractals 180 114490 [24] Fan J, Zhao D, Xia C, et al. 2022 Chaos 32 113115 [25] Wu B and Huo L 2024 Chaos, Solitons & Fractals 180 114522 [26] Huo L A and Yu Y 2023 Chaos, Solitons & Fractals 169 113229 [27] Pozzana I, Sun K and Perra N 2017 Phys. Rev. E 96 042310 [28] Huo L A and Yu Y 2023 Chin. Phys. B 32 108703 [29] Xu H, Xie W and Han D 2023 Chaos 33 013110 [30] Xie X X, Huo L A, Dong Y F, et al. 2024 Chin. Phys. B 33 038704 [31] Peng X L and Zhang Y D 2021 Chin. Phys. B 30 058901 [32] Huo L, Liu B and Zhao X 2024 Chin. Phys. B 33 128903 [33] Feng M, Liu L, Chen J, et al. 2024 Chaos, Solitons & Fractals 183 114858 [34] Koh P, Chan L L and Tan E K 2020 Arch. Med. Res. 51 716 [35] Liu H, Liu W, Yoganathan V, et al. 2021 Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change. 166 120600 [36] Guo Y, Lu Z, Kuang H, et al. 2020 Int. J. Inf. Manage. 52 102067 [37] Walker G R 2022 AIDS Edu. Prev. 34 17 [38] Jhun B, Jo M and Kahng B 2019 J. Stat. Mech. 2019 123207 [39] Alessandretti L, Sun K, Baronchelli A, et al. 2017 Phys. Rev. E 95 052318 [40] Panzarasa P, Opsahl T and Carley K M 2009 J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. 60 911 [41] Clauset A, Shalizi C R and Newman M E J 2009 SIAM Rev. 51 661 |
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|