|
|
Comparison and control of the robustness between quantum entanglement and quantum correlation in open quantum system |
Ji Ying-Hua (嵇英华)a b, Hu Ju-Ju (胡菊菊)a c, Hu Yan (胡燕 )a |
a Department of Physics, Jiangxi Normal University, Nanchang 330022, China; b Key Laboratory of Photoelectronics and Telecommunication of Jiangxi Province, Nanchang 330022, China |
|
|
Abstract We investigate the influence of environmental decoherence on the dynamics of coupled qubit system and quantum correlation. We analyse the relationship between concurrence and the degree of initial entanglement or the purity of initial quantum state, and also their relationship with quantum discord. The results show that the decrease of the purity of initial quantum state can induce the attenuation of concurrence or quantum discord, but the attenuation of quantum discord is obviously slower than concurrence's, correspondingly the survival time of quantum discord is longer. Further investigation reveals that the robustness of quantum discord and concurrence relies on the entanglement degree of initial quantum state. The higher the degree of entanglement, the more robust the quantum discord is than concurrence. And the reverse is equally true. The birth and death happen to quantum discord periodically and a newborn quantum discord comes into being under a certain condition, so does the concurrence.
|
Received: 29 March 2012
Revised: 30 April 2012
Accepted manuscript online:
|
PACS:
|
03.65.Ta
|
(Foundations of quantum mechanics; measurement theory)
|
|
03.65.Ud
|
(Entanglement and quantum nonlocality)
|
|
03.67.-a
|
(Quantum information)
|
|
Fund: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11164009). |
Corresponding Authors:
Ji Ying-Hua
E-mail: ahmxhxtt@yahoo.cn
|
Cite this article:
Ji Ying-Hua (嵇英华), Hu Ju-Ju (胡菊菊), Hu Yan (胡燕 ) Comparison and control of the robustness between quantum entanglement and quantum correlation in open quantum system 2012 Chin. Phys. B 21 110304
|
[1] |
Jones J A, Vedral V, Ekert A and Castagnoli G 2000 Nature 403 869
|
[2] |
Duan L M, Cirac J I and Zoller P 2001 Science 292 1695
|
[3] |
Ji Y H, Liu Y M and Wang Z S 2011 Chin. Phys. B 20 070304
|
[4] |
Guo Z, Yan L S, Pan W, Luo B and Xu M F 2011 Acta Phys. Sin. 60 060301 (in Chinese)
|
[5] |
Xia J P, Ren X Z, Cong H L, Wang X W and He S 2012 Acta Phys. Sin. 61 014208 (in Chinese)
|
[6] |
Almeida M P, de Melo F, Hor-Meyll M, Salles A, Walborn S P, Souto Ribeiro P H and Davidovich L 2007 Science 316 579
|
[7] |
Lopez C E, Romero G, Lastra F, Solano E and Retamal J C 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 080503
|
[8] |
Li P, Zhang Q and You J Q 2009 Phys. Rev. A 79 014303
|
[9] |
Yu T and Eberly J H 2009 Science 323 598
|
[10] |
Lu D M 2011 Acta Phys. Sin. 60 090302 (in Chinese)
|
[11] |
He J Z, He X and Zheng J 2012 Chin. Phys. B 21 050303
|
[12] |
Mintert F, Carvalho A R R, Kus M and Buchleitner A 2005 Phys. Rep. 415 207
|
[13] |
Datta A, Shaji A and Caves C M 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 050502
|
[14] |
Xu J S, Xu X Y, Li C F, Zhang C J, Zou X B and Guo G C 2010 Nature Commun. 1 1005
|
[15] |
Xu J W and Chen Q H 2012 Chin. Phys. B 21 040302
|
[16] |
Qian Y and Xu J B 2012 Chin. Phys. B 21 030405
|
[17] |
Ollivier H and Zurek W H 2001 Phys. Rev. Lett. 88 017901
|
[18] |
Sinayskiy I, Ferraro E, Napoli A, Messina A and Petruccione F 2009 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 42 485301
|
[19] |
Ji Y H and Hu J J 2010 Chin. Phys. B 19 060304
|
[20] |
Mazzola L, Piilo J and Maniscalco S 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 104 200401
|
[21] |
Wootters W K 1998 Phys. Rev. Lett. 80 2245
|
[22] |
Ali M, Rau A R P and Alber G 2010 Phys. Rev. A 81 042105
|
[23] |
Henderson L and Vedral V 2001 J. Phys. A 34 6899
|
[24] |
Jin J S, Yu C S, Pei P and Song H S 2010 J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 27 1799
|
[25] |
Yu T and Eberly J H 2006 Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 140403
|
[26] |
Peres A 1996 Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 1413
|
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|