CLASSICAL AREAS OF PHENOMENOLOGY |
Prev
Next
|
|
|
The population and decay evolution of a qubit under the time-convolutionless master equation |
Huang Jiang(黄江), Fang Mao-Fa(方卯发)†, and Liu Xiang(刘翔) |
Key Laboratory of Low-Dimensional Quantum Structures and Quantum Control of Ministry of Education, and Department of Physics, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China |
|
|
Abstract We consider the population and decay of a qubit under the electromagnetic environment. Employing the time-convolutionless master equation, we investigate the Markovian and non-Markovian behaviour of the corresponding perturbation expansion. The Jaynes-Cummings model on resonance is investigated. Some figures clearly show the different evolution behaviours. The reasons are interpreted in the paper.
|
Received: 21 March 2011
Revised: 24 July 2011
Accepted manuscript online:
|
PACS:
|
42.50.Dv
|
(Quantum state engineering and measurements)
|
|
Fund: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11074072). |
Cite this article:
Huang Jiang(黄江), Fang Mao-Fa(方卯发), and Liu Xiang(刘翔) The population and decay evolution of a qubit under the time-convolutionless master equation 2012 Chin. Phys. B 21 014205
|
[1] |
Weiss U 2008 Quantum Dissipative Systems (3rd edn.) (Singapore: World Scientific press) pp. 99-108
|
[2] |
Breuer H P and Petruccione F 2007 The Theory of Open Quantum Systems (Oxford: Oxford University Press) pp. 460-471
|
[3] |
Wang D S and Zheng Y J 2010 Chin. Phys. B 19 083202
|
[4] |
Nielsen M A and Chuang I L 2000 Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) pp. 100-112
|
[5] |
Liao X P, Fang M F, Zheng X J and Cai J W 2007 Chin. Phys. 16 1357
|
[6] |
Matsukevich D N, Chaneliere T, Jenkins S D, Lan S Y, Kennedy T A B and Kuzmich A 2006 Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 030405
|
[7] |
Schlosshauer M 2005 Rev. Mod. Phys. 76 1267
|
[8] |
Prevedal R Y, Lu W, Matthews R, Kattenback and Resch K J 2011 Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 110505
|
[9] |
Liu J M, Li J and Guo G C 2002 Chin. Phys. 11 876
|
[10] |
Ficek Z and Tanas R 2006 Phys. Rev. A 74 024304
|
[11] |
Yu T and Eberly J H 2004 Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 140404
|
[12] |
Ekert A K 1991 Phys. Rev. Lett. 67 661
|
[13] |
Ekert A K J, Tapster R and Massimo Palma G 1992 Phys. Rev. Lett. 69 1293
|
[14] |
Tae G N 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 103 230501
|
[15] |
Li H J and Zhang J S 2010 Chin. Phys. B 19 050508
|
[16] |
Bennett C H, Brassard G, Crepeau C, Jozsa R, Peres A and Wooters W K 1993 Phys. Rev. Lett. 70 1895
|
[17] |
Chen J J, An J H, Tong Q J, Luo H G and Oh C H 2010 Phys. Rev. A 81 022120
|
[18] |
He Z, Zou J, Shao B and Kong S Y 2010 J. Phys. B 43 115503
|
[19] |
Xiao X, Fang M F, Li Y L, Zeng K and Wu C 2009 J. Phys. B 42 235502
|
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|