ELECTROMAGNETISM, OPTICS, ACOUSTICS, HEAT TRANSFER, CLASSICAL MECHANICS, AND FLUID DYNAMICS |
Prev
Next
|
|
|
Bright soliton dynamics for resonant nonlinear Schrödinger equation with generalized cubic-quintic nonlinearity |
Keyu Bao(鲍柯宇), Xiaogang Tang(唐晓刚), and Ying Wang(王颖)† |
School of Science, Jiangsu University of Science and Technology, Zhenjiang 212100, China |
|
|
Abstract For systems modeled by the resonant nonlinear Schrödinger equation (RNLSE) with generalized cubic-quintic nonlinearity, we derive the bright soliton solution of the equation in (1+1) dimensions, using the modified $F$-expansion method along with the novel ansatz of $F$-base function. Furthermore, we extend the analytical study of soliton dynamics to higher (2+1) and (3+1) dimensions by using the self-similar method, and demonstrate the soliton behavior via graphical illustration. Moreover, we investigate the effect of the resonance term on bright soliton solution in (1+1) dimensions. Additionally, we consider the nonlinear equation models with perturbation terms and derive the bright soliton solutions for the one-dimensional (1D) to three-dimensional (3D) cases. The theoretical results derived can be used to guide the experimental studies and observations of bright solitons in systems described by RNLSE model.
|
Received: 09 July 2024
Revised: 20 August 2024
Accepted manuscript online: 21 August 2024
|
PACS:
|
42.65.Tg
|
(Optical solitons; nonlinear guided waves)
|
|
42.81.Dp
|
(Propagation, scattering, and losses; solitons)
|
|
02.30.Jr
|
(Partial differential equations)
|
|
42.50.Md
|
(Optical transient phenomena: quantum beats, photon echo, free-induction decay, dephasings and revivals, optical nutation, and self-induced transparency)
|
|
Fund: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11547024). |
Corresponding Authors:
Ying Wang
E-mail: wangying@just.edu.cn
|
Cite this article:
Keyu Bao(鲍柯宇), Xiaogang Tang(唐晓刚), and Ying Wang(王颖) Bright soliton dynamics for resonant nonlinear Schrödinger equation with generalized cubic-quintic nonlinearity 2024 Chin. Phys. B 33 124203
|
[1] Chen J and Yan Q 2020 Nonlinear Dyn. 100 2807 [2] Zhao X H 2021 Appl. Math. Lett. 121 107383 [3] Zhou Q, et al. 2022 Chin. Phys. Lett. 39 044202 [4] Arshad M, Seadawy A R and Lu D 2018 Optical and Quantum Electronics 50 1 [5] Hao R, Li L, Li Z, et al. 2004 Opt. Commun. 236 79 [6] Li B 2005 Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 16 1225 [7] Xiao Z J, Tian B, Wu X Y, et al. 2017 Mod. Phys. Lett. B 31 1750130 [8] Wang Y, Li S, Guo J, et al. 2016 Mathematical Methods in the Applied Science 39 5770 [9] Serkin V N and Hasegawa A 2000 Phys. Rev. Lett. 85 4502 [10] Vahidi J, Zabihi A, Rezazadeh H, et al. 2021 Optik 227 165936 [11] Awan A U, Rehman H U, Tahir M, et al. 2021 Optik 227 165496 [12] Mirzazadeh M, Eslami M, Vajargah B F, et al. 2014 Optik 125 4246 [13] Baleanu D, Inc M, Aliyu A I, et al. 2017 Optik 147 248 [14] Tamilselvan K, Kanna T and Khare A 2016 Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 39 134 [15] Das N and Saha Ray S 2023 Optical and Quantum Electronics 55 1071 [16] Dabrowska-Wüster B J, Wüster S and Davis M J 2009 New J. Phys. 11 053017 [17] Atai J and Malomed B A 2001 Phys. Lett. A 284 247 [18] Agrawal G P 2000 Nonlinear Science at the Dawn of the 21st Century (Berlin: Springer-Verlag) pp. 195-211 [19] Pan Wang and Bo Tian 2012 Opt. Commun. 285 3567 [20] Akram G, Sadaf M and Khan M A U 2023 Math. Comput. Simul. 206 1 [21] Bulut H, Sulaiman T A and Baskonus H M 2018 Optik 163 49 [22] Rezazadeh, Hadi, Abazari, et al. 2020 Open Physics 18 761 [23] Wang Y, Wang W and Zhou S Y 2017 Commun. Theor. Phys. 68 623 [24] Wang Y, Cheng Q, Guo J, et al. 2019 AIP Adv. 9 075206 [25] Abdou M A 2007 Chaos, Solitons and Fractals 31 95 [26] Fei J X and Zheng C L 2013 Chin. J. Phys. 51 200 [27] Das A, Karmakar B, Biswas A, et al. 2023 Nonlinear Dyn. 111 15347 [28] Qi W, Liang Z X and Zhang Z D 2013 J. Phys. B 46 175301 [29] Eslami M, Mirzazadeh M, Vajargah B F, et al. 2014 Optik 125 3107 [30] Rezazadeh H, Ullah N and Akinyemi L, et al. 2021 Results in Physics 24 104179 [31] Wang Y and Zhou Y 2014 AIP Advance 4 067131 [32] Inc M, Aliyu A I, Yusuf A, et al. 2018 Superlattices and Microstructures 113 541 [33] Liu X, Jiao Y, Wang Y, et al. 2022 Results in Physics 33 105162 [34] Tang X and Wang Y 2023 The Eur. Phys. J. D 77 179 [35] Zhao Y, Chen Y, Dai J, et al. 2019 Adv. Math. Phys. 2019 8264848 [36] Li J, Yang Z J and Zhang S M 2024 Chaos, Solitons and Fractals 187 115338 [37] Sun Z, Deng D and Yang Z M 2024 Opt. Express 32 29976 [38] Pang F Z, et al. 2023 Chin. Phys. B 32 050205 [39] Biswas A, Yildirim Y, Yasar E, et al. 2018 Optik 160 33 [40] Yang J 2010 Nonlinear Waves in Integrable and Non-integrable Systems (Philadelphia: SIAM) p. 168 [41] Pashaev O K and Lee J H 2002 Mod. Phys. Lett. A 17 1601 [42] Choudhuri A, Triki H and Porsezian K 2016 Phys. Rev. A 94 063814 |
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|