Yan Gu(古燕)1, Haifeng Zhang(张海峰)1, Zhigang Song(宋志刚)1, Jiuqing Liang(梁九卿)1, Lianfu Wei(韦联福)2,3
1 Institute of Theoretical Physics and Department of Physics, State Key Laboratory of Quantum Optics and Quantum Optics Devices, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, China;
2 State Key Laboratory of Optoelectronic Materials and Technologies, School of Physics and Engineering, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China;
3 Quantum Optoelectronics Laboratory, School of Physics and Technology, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China
The original formula of Bell inequality (BI) in terms of two-spin singlet has to be modified for the entangled-state with parallel spin polarization. Based on classical statistics of the particle-number correlation, we prove in this paper an extended BI, which is valid for two-spin entangled states with both parallel and antiparallel polarizations. The BI and its violation can be formulated in a unified formalism based on the spin coherent-state quantum probability statistics with the state-density operator, which is separated to the local and non-local parts. The local part gives rise to the BI, while the violation is a direct result of the non-local quantum interference between two components of entangled state. The Bell measuring outcome correlation denoted by PB is always less than or at most equal to one for the local realistic model (PBlc ≤ 1) regardless of the specific superposition coefficients of entangled state. Including the non-local quantum interference the maximum violation of BI is found as PBmax=2, which, however depends on state parameters and three measuring directions as well. Our result is suitable for entangled photon pairs.
Yan Gu(古燕), Haifeng Zhang(张海峰), Zhigang Song(宋志刚), Jiuqing Liang(梁九卿), Lianfu Wei(韦联福) Extended Bell inequality and maximum violation 2018 Chin. Phys. B 27 100303
[1]
Su H Y, Wu Y C and Chen J L 2013 Phys. Rev. A 88 022124
[2]
Kwiat P G, Barraza-Lopez S, Stefanov A, et al. 2001 Nature 409 1014
[3]
Popescu S 2010 Nat. Phys. 6 151
[4]
Nielsen M A and Chuang I L 2011 Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (Cambridge:Cambridge University Press) pp. 1-59
[5]
Bennett C H and Divincenzo D P 2000 Nature 404 247
[6]
Loss D and DiVincenzo D P 1998 Phys. Rev. A 57 120
[7]
Bell J S 1964 Physics 1 195
[8]
Waldherr G, Neumann P, Huelga S F, Jelezko F and Wrachtrup J 2011 Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 090401
[9]
Sakai H, Saito T, Ikeda T, et al. 2006 Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 150405
[10]
Pal K F and Vertesi T 2017 Phys. Rev. A 96 022123
[11]
Rowe M A, Kielpinski D, Meyer V, et al. 2001 Nature 409 791
[12]
Dada A C, Leach J, Buller G S, et al. 2012 Nat. Phys. 7 677
[13]
Gisin N and Peres A 1992 Phys. Lett. A 162 15
[14]
Brito S G A, Amaral B and Chaves R 2018 Phys. Rev. A 97 022111
[15]
Pozsgay V, Hirsch F, Branciard C, et al. 2017 Phys. Rev. A 96 062128
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
