CONDENSED MATTER: ELECTRONIC STRUCTURE, ELECTRICAL, MAGNETIC, AND OPTICAL PROPERTIES |
Prev
Next
|
|
|
Effect of surface morphology on the electron mobility of epitaxial graphene grown on 0° and 8° Si-terminated 4H-SiC substrates |
Li Jia (李佳)a, Wang Li (王丽)b, Feng Zhi-Hong (冯志红)a, Yu Cui (蔚翠)a, Liu Qing-Bin (刘庆彬)a, Dun Shao-Bo (敦少博)a, Cai Shu-Jun (蔡树军)a |
a Science and Technology on ASIC Lab., Hebei Semiconductor Research Institute, Shijiazhuang 050051, China; b Information Center of Science and Technology, Beijing 100040, China |
|
|
Abstract Graphene with different surface morphologies were fabricated on 8°-off-axis and on-axis 4H-SiC(0001) substrates by high-temperature thermal decomposition. Graphene grown on Si-terminated 8°-off-axis 4H-SiC(0001) shows lower Hall mobility than the counterpart of on-axis SiC substrates. The terrace width is not responsible for different electron mobility of graphene grown on different substrates, as the terrace width is much larger than the mean free path of the electrons. The electron mobility of graphene remains unchanged with increasing terrace width on Si-terminated on-axis SiC. The interface scattering and short-range scattering are the main factors affecting the mobility of epitaxial graphene. After the optimization of the growth process, the Hall mobility of the graphene reaches 1770 cm2/V · s at a carrier density of 9.8.× 1012 cm-2. Wafer-size graphene was successfully achieved with an excellent double-layer thickness uniformity of 89.7% on a 3-inch SiC substrate.
|
Received: 30 January 2012
Revised: 19 March 2012
Accepted manuscript online:
|
PACS:
|
73.63.-b
|
(Electronic transport in nanoscale materials and structures)
|
|
72.80.Vp
|
(Electronic transport in graphene)
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
Feng Zhi-Hong
E-mail: blueledviet@yahoo.com.cn
|
Cite this article:
Li Jia (李佳), Wang Li (王丽), Feng Zhi-Hong (冯志红), Yu Cui (蔚翠), Liu Qing-Bin (刘庆彬), Dun Shao-Bo (敦少博), Cai Shu-Jun (蔡树军) Effect of surface morphology on the electron mobility of epitaxial graphene grown on 0° and 8° Si-terminated 4H-SiC substrates 2012 Chin. Phys. B 21 097304
|
[1] |
Geim A K and Novoselov K S 2007 Nature Mater. 6 183
|
[2] |
Lemme M C, Echtermeyer T J, Baus M and Kurz H 2007 Electron Dev. Lett. 28 282
|
[3] |
Zhang Y B, Tan Y W, Stormer H L and Kim P 2005 Nature 438 201
|
[4] |
Berger C, Song Z, Li X B, Wu X S, Brown N, Naud C, Mayou D, Li T, Hass J, Marchenkov A N, Conrad E H, First P N and Heer W A 2006 Science 312 1191
|
[5] |
Xia F N, Farmer D B, Lin Y M and Avouris P 2010 Nano Lett. 10 715
|
[6] |
Bolotin K I, Sikes K J, Jiang Z, Klima M, Fudenberg G, Hone J, Kim P and Stormer H L 2008 Solid State Commun. 146 351
|
[7] |
Novoselov K S, Geim A K, Morozov S V, Jiang D, Zhang Y, Dubonos S V, Grigorieva I V and Firsov A A 2004 Science 306 666
|
[8] |
Novoselov K S, Jiang D, Schedin F, Booth T J, Khotkevich V V, Morzov S V and Geim A K 2005 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 102 10451
|
[9] |
Kim K S, Zhao Y, Jang H, Lee S Y, Kim J M, Kim K S, Ahn J H, Kim P, Choi J Y and Hong B H 2009 Nature 457 706
|
[10] |
Li X S, Cai W W, An J, Nah J, Yang D X, Piner R, Velamakanni A, Jung I, Tutuc E, Banerjee S K, Colombo L and Ruoff R S 2009 Science 324 1312
|
[11] |
McArdle T J, Chu J O, Zhu Y, Liu Z H, Krishnan M, Breslin C M, Dimitrakopoulos C, Wisnieff R and Grill A 2011 Appl. Phys. Lett. 98 132108
|
[12] |
Emtsev K V, Bostwick A, Horn K, Jobst J, Kellogg G L, Ley L, McChesney J L, Ohta T, Reshanov S A, Röhrl J, Rotenberg E, Schmid A K, Waldmann D, Weber H B and Seyller T 2009 Nature Mater. 8 203
|
[13] |
Hass J, Varchon F, Millán-Otoya J E, Sprinkle M, Sharma N, de Heer W A, Berger C, First P N, Magaud L and Conrad E H 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 125504
|
[14] |
Lin Y M, Dimitrakopoulos C, Jenkins K A, Farmer D B, Chiu H Y and Avouris P H 2010 Science 327 662
|
[15] |
Luxmi, Fisher P J, Srivastava N and Feenstra R M 2009 Appl. Phys. Lett. 95 073101
|
[16] |
Robinson J A, LaBella M, Trumbull K A, Weng X J, Cavelero R, Daniels T, Hughes Z, Hollander M, Fanton M and Snyder D 2010 ACS Nano 4 2667
|
[17] |
Berger C, Song Z M, Li X B, Wu X S, Brown N, Naud C, Mayou D, Li T, Hass J, Marchenkov A N, Conrad E H, First P N and Heer W A 2006 Science 312 1191
|
[18] |
Dimitrakopoulos C, Grill A, McArdle T J, Liu Z H, Wisnieff R and Antoniadis D A 2011 Appl. Phys. Lett. 98 222105
|
[19] |
Hannon J B and Tromp R M 2008 Phys. Rev. B 77 241404
|
[20] |
Sharp J W, Poon S J and Goldsmid H J 2001 Phys. Status Solidi A 187 507
|
[21] |
Castro Neto A H, Guinea F, Peres N M R, Novoselov K S and Geim A K 2009 Rev. Mod. Phys. 81 109
|
[22] |
Tanabe S, Sekine Y, Kageshima H, Nagase M and Hibino H 2011 Phys. Rev. B 84 115458
|
[23] |
Ni Z H, Wang Y Y, Yu T and Shen Z X 2008 Nano Res. 1 273
|
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|