CONDENSED MATTER: ELECTRONIC STRUCTURE, ELECTRICAL, MAGNETIC, AND OPTICAL PROPERTIES |
Prev
Next
|
|
|
Two-dimensional analysis of the interface states effects on current gain for 4H-SiC bipolar junction transistor |
Zhang You-Run(张有润)†, Zhang Bo(张波), Li Zhao-Ji(李肇基), and Deng Xiao-Chuan(邓小川) |
State Key Laboratory of Electronic Thin Films and Integrated Devices, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 610054, China |
|
|
Abstract This paper studies two-dimensional analysis of the surface state effect on current gain for a 4H--SiC bipolar junction transistor (BJT). Simulation results indicate the mechanism of current gain degradation, which is surface Fermi level pinning leading to a strong downward bending of the energy bands to form the channel of surface electron recombination current. The experimental results are well-matched with the simulation, which is modeled by exponential distributions of the interface state density replacing the single interface state trap. Furthermore, the simulation reveals that the oxide quality of the base emitter junction interface is very important for 4H--SiC BJT performance.
|
Received: 18 September 2009
Accepted manuscript online:
|
PACS:
|
85.30.Pq
|
(Bipolar transistors)
|
|
85.30.De
|
(Semiconductor-device characterization, design, and modeling)
|
|
73.20.At
|
(Surface states, band structure, electron density of states)
|
|
73.40.Lq
|
(Other semiconductor-to-semiconductor contacts, p-n junctions, and heterojunctions)
|
|
73.25.+i
|
(Surface conductivity and carrier phenomena)
|
|
Cite this article:
Zhang You-Run(张有润), Zhang Bo(张波), Li Zhao-Ji(李肇基), and Deng Xiao-Chuan(邓小川) Two-dimensional analysis of the interface states effects on current gain for 4H-SiC bipolar junction transistor 2010 Chin. Phys. B 19 067102
|
[1] |
Krishnaswami S, Agarwal A, Ryu S H, Capell C, Richmond J, Palmour J, Balachandran S, Chow T P, Bayne S, Geil B, Jones K and Scozzie C 2005 Electron Device Lett . 26 175
|
[2] |
Balachandran S, Chow T P, Agarwal A, Scozzie C and Jones K A 2005 Electron Device Lett . 26 470
|
[3] |
Ivanov P A, Levinshtein M E, Agarwal A K, Krishnaswami S and Palmour J W 2006 Electron Devices 53 1245
|
[4] |
Zhang J H, Li X Q, Alexandrov P, Fursin L, Wang X H and Zhao J H 2008 Electron Devices 55 1899
|
[5] |
Gao Y, Huang A Q, Zhang Q C, Krishnaswami S and Agarwal A K 2007 Proc. 19th Int. Symp. Power Semiconductor Devices Ics {121
|
[6] |
Knaup J M, Frauenheim P D T, Gali A, Hajnal Z and Choyke W J 2005 Phys. Rev . B 72 115323
|
[7] |
Soares G V, Baumvol I J R, Hold L, Kong F, Dimitrijev J H S, Radtke C and Stedile F C 2007 Appl. Phys. Lett . 91 041906
|
[8] |
Powell S K, Goldsman N, McGarrity J M, Bernstein J, Scozzie C J and Lelis A 2002 J. Appl. Phys . 92 4053
|
[9] |
Potbhare S, Goldsman N, Lelis A, McGarrity J M, McLean F B and Habersat D 2008 Electron Devices 55 2029
|
[10] |
Zhang Y R, Zhang B, Li Z J, Deng X C and Liu X L 2009 Chin. Phys. B 18 3995
|
[11] |
Deng X C, Feng Z, Zhang B, Li Z J, Li L and Pan H S 2009 Chin. Phys. B 18 3018
|
[12] |
Lindefelt U 1998 J. Appl. Phys. 84 2628
|
[13] |
Device Simulator Atlas 2008 Atlas User's Manual Silvaco International
|
[14] |
Kordina O and Bergman J P 1996 Appl. Phys. Lett. 69 679
|
[15] |
Ruff M, Mitlehner H and Helbig R 1994 Electron Devices 41 1040
|
[16] |
Capano M A, Santhakumar R, Venugopal R, Melloch M R and Cooper J A 2000 J. Electr. Mater. 29 210
|
[17] |
Vathulya V R and White M H 2000 Electron Devices 47 2018
|
[18] |
Saks N S, Mani S S and Agarwal A K 2000 Appl. Phys. Lett. 76 2250
|
[19] |
Yano H, Katafuchi F and Matsunami H 1999 Electron Devices 46 504
|
[20] |
Constand A, Camara N, Godignon P and Camassel J 2009 Appl. Phys. Lett. 94 063508
|
[21] |
Tao N G M, Liu H G and Bolognesi C R 2005 Electron Devices 52 1061
|
[22] |
Tiwari S and David J F 1989 Electron Devices 36 2105
|
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|