|
|
Verifiable quantum secret sharing scheme based on orthogonal product states |
Chen-Ming Bai(白晨明)†, Lu Liu(刘璐), and Sujuan Zhang(张素娟) |
Department of Mathematics and Physics, Shijiazhuang Tiedao University, Shijiazhuang 050043, China |
|
|
Abstract In the domain of quantum cryptography, the implementation of quantum secret sharing stands as a pivotal element. In this paper, we propose a novel verifiable quantum secret sharing protocol using the $d$-dimensional product state and Lagrange interpolation techniques. This protocol is initiated by the dealer Alice, who initially prepares a quantum product state, selected from a predefined set of orthogonal product states within the $\mathbb{C}^d \otimes \mathbb{C}^d$ framework. Subsequently, the participants execute unitary operations on this product state to recover the underlying secret. Furthermore, we subject the protocol to a rigorous security analysis, considering both eavesdropping attacks and potential dishonesty from the participants. Finally, we conduct a comparative analysis of our protocol against existing schemes. Our scheme exhibits economies of scale by exclusively employing quantum product states, thereby realizing significant cost-efficiency advantages. In terms of access structure, we adopt a $(t,n)$-threshold architecture, a strategic choice that augments the protocol's practicality and suitability for diverse applications. Furthermore, our protocol includes a rigorous integrity verification mechanism to ensure the honesty and reliability of the participants throughout the execution of the protocol.
|
Received: 21 December 2023
Revised: 04 March 2024
Accepted manuscript online: 15 March 2024
|
PACS:
|
03.67.-a
|
(Quantum information)
|
|
03.65.Ud
|
(Entanglement and quantum nonlocality)
|
|
Fund: This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 12301590) and the Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province (Grant No. A2022210002). |
Corresponding Authors:
Chen-Ming Bai
E-mail: baichm@stdu.edu.cn
|
Cite this article:
Chen-Ming Bai(白晨明), Lu Liu(刘璐), and Sujuan Zhang(张素娟) Verifiable quantum secret sharing scheme based on orthogonal product states 2024 Chin. Phys. B 33 070302
|
[1] Shamir A 1979 Commun. ACM 22 612 [2] Blakley G R 1979 In Proceedings of the 1979 International Workshop on Managing Requirements Knowledge (MARK), New York, NY, USA, 4-7 June 1979; Volume 48, pp. 313-317 [3] Hillery M, Buzek V and Berthiaume A 1999 Phys. Rev. A 59 1829 [4] Cleve R, Gottesman D and Lo H K 1999 Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 648 [5] Gottesman D 2000 Phys. Rev. A 61 042311 [6] Xiao L, Long G L, Deng F G and Pan J W 2004 Phys. Rev. A 69 052307 [7] Grice W P and Qi B 2019 Phys. Rev. A 100 022339 [8] Qin H W, Zhu X H and Dai Y W 2015 Quantum Inf. Process 14 2997 [9] Lipinska V, Murta G, Ribeiro J and Wehner S 2020 Phys. Rev. A 101 032332 [10] Gu J, Cao X Y, Yin H L, et al. 2021 Opt. Express 29 9165 [11] Mashhadi S 2022 Journal of Applied Security Research 17 123 [12] Li F, Chen T and Zhu S 2022 Physica A 606 128122 [13] Li F, Luo M, Zhu H, et al. 2023 Physica A 612 128494 [14] Li L and Li Z 2023 Entropy 25 265 [15] Xu J, Li X, Han Y, et al 2023 Frontiers in Physics 11 1213153 [16] Wang J, Li L, Peng H and Yang Y 2017 Phys. Rev. A 95 022320 [17] Tavakoli A, Herbauts I, Zukowski M and Bourennane M 2015 Phys. Rev. A 92 030302 [18] Qin H and Dai Y 2016 Information Processing Letters 116 351 [19] Bai C M, Zhang S and Liu L 2021 International Journal of Theoretical Physics 60 3993 [20] Liu S, Lu Z, Wang P, et al. 2023 npj Quantum Information 9 92 [21] Shen A, Cao X Y, Wang Y, et al. 2023 Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy 66 260311 [22] Li C L, Fu Y, Liu W B, et al. 2023 Phys. Rev. Research 5 033077 [23] Gu J, Xie Y M, Liu W B, et al. 2021 Opt. Express 29 32244 [24] Guo G P and Guo G C 2003 Phys. Lett. A 310 247 [25] Hsu L Y, Li C M 2005 Phys. Rev. A 71 022321 [26] Yang Y G, Wen Q Y and Zhu F C 2007 Sci. China Ser. G 50 331 [27] Hu W, Zhou R G and Luo J 2022 Chin. J. Phys. 77 1701 [28] Xu G B, Wen Q Y, Gao F, Qin S J and Zuo H J 2017 Quantum Inf. Process 16 1 [29] Feng Y and Shi Y 2009 IEEE transactions on information theory 55 2799 [30] Xu G B, Wen Q Y, Qin S J, Yang Y H and Gao F 2016 Phys. Rev. A 93 032341 [31] Zhen X F, Fei S M and Zuo H J 2022 Phys. Rev. A 106 062432 [32] Long G L and Liu X S 2002 Phys. Rev. A 65 032302 [33] Li C Y, Zhou H Y, Wang Y and Deng F G 2005 Chin. Phys. Lett. 22 1049 [34] Walgate J and Hardy L 2002 Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 147901 [35] Li C Y, Li X H, Deng F G, et al. 2006 Chin. Phys. Lett. 23 2896 [36] Karimipour V, Asoudeh M, Gheorghiu V, Looi S Y and Griffiths R B 2015 Phys. Rev. A 92 030301 |
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|