CONDENSED MATTER: ELECTRONIC STRUCTURE, ELECTRICAL, MAGNETIC, AND OPTICAL PROPERTIES |
Prev
Next
|
|
|
Quantum confinement effects and source-to-drain tunneling in ultra-scaled double-gate silicon n-MOSFETs |
Jiang Xiang-Wei(姜向伟)† and Li Shu-Shen(李树深) |
State Key Laboratory of Superlattices and Microstructures, Institute of Semiconductors, Chinese Academy of Sciences, P. O. Box 912, Beijing 100083, China |
|
|
Abstract By using the linear combination of bulk band (LCBB) method incorporated with the top of the barrier splitting (TBS) model, we present a comprehensive study on the quantum confinement effects and the source-to-drain tunneling in the ultra-scaled double-gate (DG) metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistors (MOSFETs). A critical body thickness value of 5 nm is found, below which severe valley splittings among different X valleys for the occupied charge density and the current contributions occur in ultra-thin silicon body structures. It is also found that the tunneling current could be nearly 100% with an ultra-scaled channel length. Different from the previous simulation results, it is found that the source-to-drain tunneling could be effectively suppressed in the ultra-thin body thickness (2.0 nm and below) by the quantum confinement and the tunneling could be suppressed down to below 5% when the channel length approaches 16 nm regardless of the body thickness.
|
Received: 08 September 2011
Revised: 10 November 2011
Accepted manuscript online:
|
PACS:
|
73.23.Ad
|
(Ballistic transport)
|
|
73.40.Qv
|
(Metal-insulator-semiconductor structures (including semiconductor-to-insulator))
|
|
Fund: Project supported by the National Basic Research Program of China (Grant No. G2009CB929300) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 60821061 and 60776061). |
Corresponding Authors:
Jiang Xiang-Wei,xwjiang@semi.ac.cn
E-mail: xwjiang@semi.ac.cn
|
Cite this article:
Jiang Xiang-Wei(姜向伟) and Li Shu-Shen(李树深) Quantum confinement effects and source-to-drain tunneling in ultra-scaled double-gate silicon n-MOSFETs 2012 Chin. Phys. B 21 027304
|
[1] |
online available: http://www.itrs.net
|
[2] |
Wong H S 2002 IBM J. RES. & DEV. bf46 2/3
|
[3] |
Haensch W, Nowak E J, Dennard R H, Solomon P M, Bryant A, Dokumaci O H, Kumar A, Wang X, Johnson J B and Fischetti M V 2006 IBM J. RES. & DEV. bf50 4/5
|
[4] |
Frank D J, Laux S E and Fischetti M V 1992 IEDM Tech. Dig. pp. 553-556
|
[5] |
Wong H S, Frank D J, Taur Y and Stork M C 1994 IEDM Tech. Dig. pp. 747-750
|
[6] |
Hisamoto D, Lee W C, Kedzierski J, Takeuchi H, Asano K, Kuo C, Anderson E, King T J, Bokor J and Hu C 2000 IEEE Trans. Electron Dev. bf47 2320
|
[7] |
Shin M 2007 J. Appl. Phys. bf101 024510
|
[8] |
Anantram M P and Svizhenko A 2007 IEEE Trans. Electron Dev. bf54 2100
|
[9] |
Sverdlov V, Ungersboeck E, Kosina H and Selberherr S 2008 Mat. Sci. Eng. R58 228
|
[10] |
Iafrate G J, Grubin H L and Ferry D K 1981 J. Phys. bf42 307
|
[11] |
Ferry D K and Zhou J R 1993 Phys. Rev. B bf48 7944
|
[12] |
Jin S, Fischetti M V and Tang T W 2008 Appl. Phys. Lett. bf92 082103
|
[13] |
Vasileska D, Ferry D K and Goodnick S M 2006 Handbook of Theoretical and Computational Nanotechnology 10, Chap. 1
|
[14] |
Lake R, Klimeck G, Bowen R C and Javanovic D 1997 J. Appl. Phys. bf81 7845
|
[15] |
Luisier M, Schenk A, Fichtner W and Klimeck G 2006 Phys. Rev. B bf74 205323
|
[16] |
Luisier M and Klimeck G 2009 IEEE Electron Dev. Lett. bf30 602
|
[17] |
Laux S E, Kumar A and Fischetti M V 2004 J. Appl. Phys. bf95 5545
|
[18] |
Jiang X W, Li S S, Xia J B and Wang L W 2011 J. Appl. Phys. bf109 054503
|
[19] |
Wang L W and Zunger A 1999 Phys. Rev. B bf59 15806
|
[20] |
Wang L W and Zunger A 1994 J. Phys. Chem. bf98 2158
|
[21] |
Wang L W, Franceschetti A and Zunger A 1997 Phys. Rev. Lett. bf78 2819
|
[22] |
Wood D M and Zunger A 1996 Phys. Rev. B bf53 7949
|
[23] |
Wang L W and Zunger A 1996 Phys. Rev. B bf54 11417
|
[24] |
Esseni D and Palestri P 2005 Phys. Rev. B bf72 165342
|
[25] |
VASP: Vienna ab-initio Simulation Package, http://cms.linebreak mpi.univie.ac.at/vasp/vasp/vasp.html
|
[26] |
Shimizu K, Saraya T and Hiramoto T 2010 IEEE Electron Dev. Lett. bf31 4
|
[27] |
Deng H X, Jiang X W, Li S S, Xia J B and Wang L W 2008 J. Appl. Phys. 103 124507
|
[28] |
Wu T F, Zhang H M, Wang G Y and Hu H Y 2011 Acta Phys. Sin. bf60 027305 (in Chinese)
|
[29] |
Wu H Y, Zhang H M, Song J J and Hu H Y 2011 Acta Phys. Sin. bf60 097302 (in Chinese)
|
[30] |
Wang J and Lundstrom M 2002 International Electron Device Meeting (IEDM) p. 707 http: // ieeexplore.ieee.org / xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber= 1175936&tag=1
|
[31] |
Kawaura H, Sakamoto T and Baba T 2000 Appl. Phys. Lett. bf76 3810
|
[32] |
Chang L and Hu C 2000 Supperlattices and Microstructures bf28 351
|
[33] |
Schenk A and Wettstein A 2002 Technical Proceedings of the 2002 International Conference on Modeling and Simulation of Microsystems p. 552 http://www.linebreak nsti.org/procs/MSM2002/11/X21.03
|
[34] |
Asenov A, Brown A R and Watling J R 2002 Technical Proceedings of the 2002 International Conference on Modeling and Simulation of Microsystems p. 490 http://www. nsti.org/procs/MSM2002/10/M41.02
|
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|