| CONDENSED MATTER: ELECTRONIC STRUCTURE, ELECTRICAL, MAGNETIC, AND OPTICAL PROPERTIES |
Prev
Next
|
|
|
Detailed electronic structure of three-dimensional Fermi surface and its sensitivity to charge density wave transition in ZrTe3 revealed by high resolution laser-based angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy |
| Shou-Peng Lyu(吕守鹏)1,2, Li Yu(俞理)1, Jian-Wei Huang(黄建伟)1,2, Cheng-Tian Lin(林成天)3, Qiang Gao(高强)1,2, Jing Liu(刘静)1,2, Guo-Dong Liu(刘国东)1, Lin Zhao(赵林)1, Jie Yuan(袁洁)1, Chuang-Tian Chen(陈创天)4, Zu-Yan Xu(许祖彦)4, Xing-Jiang Zhou(周兴江)1,2,5 |
1 National Laboratory for Superconductivity, Beijing National Laboratory for Condensed Matter Physics, Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China;
2 University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;
3 Max-Planck-Institut für Festkörperforschung, Heisenbergstrasse 1, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany;
4 Technical Institute of Physics and Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China;
5 Collaborative Innovation Center of Quantum Matter, Beijing 100871, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract The detailed information of the electronic structure is the key to understanding the nature of charge density wave (CDW) order and its relationship with superconducting order in the microscopic level. In this paper, we present a high resolution laser-based angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy (ARPES) study on the three-dimensional (3D) hole-like Fermi surface around the Brillouin zone center in a prototypical quasi-one-dimensional CDW and superconducting system ZrTe3. Double Fermi surface sheets are clearly resolved for the 3D hole-like Fermi surface around the zone center. The 3D Fermi surface shows a pronounced shrinking with increasing temperature. In particular, the quasiparticle scattering rate along the 3D Fermi surface experiences an anomaly near the charge density wave transition temperature of ZrTe3 (~63 K). The signature of electron-phonon coupling is observed with a dispersion kink at~20 meV; the strength of the electron-phonon coupling around the 3D Fermi surface is rather weak. These results indicate that the 3D Fermi surface is also closely connected to the charge-density-wave transition and suggest a more global impact on the entire electronic structure induced by the CDW phase transition in ZrTe3.
|
Received: 22 May 2018
Revised: 29 May 2018
Accepted manuscript online:
|
|
PACS:
|
75.78.Cd
|
(Micromagnetic simulations ?)
|
| |
75.78.-n
|
(Magnetization dynamics)
|
| |
75.90.+w
|
(Other topics in magnetic properties and materials)
|
|
| Fund: Project supported by the National Basic Research Program of China (Grant No. 2015CB921301), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 11574360, 11534007, and 11334010), and the Strategic Priority Research Program (B) of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant No. XDB07020300). |
Corresponding Authors:
Li Yu, Xing-Jiang Zhou
E-mail: li.yu@iphy.ac.cn;XJZhou@iphy.ac.cn
|
Cite this article:
Shou-Peng Lyu(吕守鹏), Li Yu(俞理), Jian-Wei Huang(黄建伟), Cheng-Tian Lin(林成天), Qiang Gao(高强), Jing Liu(刘静), Guo-Dong Liu(刘国东), Lin Zhao(赵林), Jie Yuan(袁洁), Chuang-Tian Chen(陈创天), Zu-Yan Xu(许祖彦), Xing-Jiang Zhou(周兴江) Detailed electronic structure of three-dimensional Fermi surface and its sensitivity to charge density wave transition in ZrTe3 revealed by high resolution laser-based angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy 2018 Chin. Phys. B 27 087503
|
| [1] |
Gabovich A M, Voitenko A I, Ekino T, Li M S, Szymczak H and Pekala M 2010 Adv. Condens. Matter Phys. 2010 1
|
| [2] |
Pfleiderer C 2009 Rev. Mod. Phys. 81 1551
|
| [3] |
He S, He J, Zhang W, Zhao L, Liu D, Liu X, Mou D, Ou Y B, Wang Q Y, Li Z, Wang L, Peng Y, Liu Y, Chen C, Yu L, Liu G, Dong X, Zhang J, Chen C, Xu Z, Chen X, Ma X, Xue Q and Zhou X J 2013 Nat. Mater. 12 605
|
| [4] |
Zhu X, Ning W, Li L, Ling L, Zhang R, Zhang J, Wang K, Liu Y, Pi L, Ma Y, Du H, Tian M, Sun Y, Petrovic C and Zhang Y 2016 Sci. Rep. 6 26974
|
| [5] |
Cui S, He L P, Hong X C, Zhu X D, Petrovic C and Li S Y 2016 Chin. Phys. B 25 077403
|
| [6] |
Denholme S J, Yukawa A, Tsumura K, Nagao M, Tamura R, Watauchi S, Tanaka I, Takayanagi H and Miyakawa N 2017 Sci. Rep. 7 45217
|
| [7] |
Kidd T E, Miller T, Chou M Y and Chiang T C 2002 Phys. Rev. Lett. 88 226402
|
| [8] |
Kolekar S, Bonilla M, Ma Y, Diaz H C and Batzill M 2017 2D Mater. 5 015006
|
| [9] |
Kwang-Hua C W 2012 Chem. Phys. 409 37
|
| [10] |
Schmitt F, Kirchmann P S, Bovensiepen U, Moore R G, Rettig L, Krenz M, Chu J-H, Ru N, Perfetti L, Lu D H, Wolf M, Fisher I R and Shen Z X 2008 Science 321 1649
|
| [11] |
Yamaya K, Takayanagi S and Tanda S 2012 Phys. Rev. B 85 184513
|
| [12] |
Yomo R, Yamaya K, Abliz M, Hedo M and Uwatoko Y 2005 Phys. Rev. B 71 132508
|
| [13] |
Tsuchiya S, Matsubayashi K, Yamaya K, Takayanagi S, Tanda S and Uwatoko Y 2017 New J. Phys. 19 063004
|
| [14] |
Yamaya K, Yoneda M, Yasuzuka S, Okajima Y and Tanda S 2002 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter. 14 10767
|
| [15] |
Mirri C, Dusza A, Zhu X, Lei H, Ryu H, Degiorgi L and Petrovic C 2014 Phys. Rev. B 89 035144
|
| [16] |
Zhu X, Lei H and Petrovic C 2011 Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 246404
|
| [17] |
Lei H, Zhu X and Petrovic C 2011 Europhys. Lett. 95 17011
|
| [18] |
Yokoya T, Kiss T, Chainani A, Shin S and Yamaya K 2005 Phys. Rev. B 71 140504
|
| [19] |
Hoesch M, Cui X, Shimada K, Battaglia C, Fujimori S-i and Berger H 2009 Phys. Rev. B 80 075423
|
| [20] |
Eaglesham D J, Steeds J W and Wilson J A 1984 J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys. 17 697
|
| [21] |
Gleason S L, Gim Y, Byrum T, Kogar A, Abbamonte P, Fradkin E, MacDougall G J, Van Harlingen D J, Zhu X, Petrovic C and Cooper S L 2015 Phys. Rev. B 91 155124
|
| [22] |
Hoesch M, Bosak A, Chernyshov D, Berger H and Krisch M 2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 086402
|
| [23] |
Hu Y, Zheng F, Ren X, Feng J and Li Y 2015 Phys. Rev. B 91 144502
|
| [24] |
Zhou X J, He S L, Liu G D, Zhao L, Yu L and Zhang W T 2018 Rep. Prog. Phys. 81 062101
|
| [25] |
Zhu X, Lv B, Wei F, Xue Y, Lorenz B, Deng L, Sun Y and Chu C W 2013 Phys. Rev. B 87 024508
|
| [26] |
Stowe K and Wagner F R 1998 J. Solid State Chem. 138 160
|
| [27] |
Felser C, Finckh E W, Kleinke H, Rocker F and Tremel W 1998 J. Mater. Chem. 8 1787
|
| [28] |
Zhang Y, Wang C, Yu L, Liu G, Liang A, Huang J, Nie S, Sun X, Zhang Y, Shen B, Liu J, Weng H, Zhao L, Chen G, Jia X, Hu C, Ding Y, Zhao W, Gao Q, Li C, He S, Zhao L, Zhang F, Zhang S, Yang F, Wang Z, Peng Q, Dai X, Fang Z, Xu Z, Chen C and Zhou X J 2017 Nat. Commun. 8 15512
|
| [29] |
Seshadri R, Suard E, Felser C, Finckh E W, Maignanc A and Tremel W 1998 J. Mater. Chem. 8 2869
|
| [30] |
Wu Y, Jo N H, Ochi M, Huang L, Mou D, Budko S L, Canfield P C, Trivedi N, Arita R and Kaminski A 2015 Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 166602
|
| No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|
