Influence of transition metals (Sc, Ti, V, Cr, and Mn) doping on magnetism of CdS
Zhongqiang Suo(索忠强)1, Jianfeng Dai(戴剑锋)1,2, †, Shanshan Gao(高姗姗)1, and Haoran Gao(高浩然)1$
1 School of Science, Lanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou 730050, China 2 State Key Laboratory of Advanced Processing and Recycling of Nanoferrous Metals, Lanzhou 730050, China
The influence of transition metals (Sc, Ti, V, Cr, and Mn) doping at different distances on the magnetism of CdS is studied by using generalized gradient approximation combined with Hubbard U in the VASP package. The results show that the doping systems are more stable, easy to form, and the wurtzite structure of CdS is not changed. It is found that the systems are antiferromagnetic (AFM) when nearest neighbor doping, which is attributed to the direct charge transfers between two impurity ions. The systems are ferromagnetic (FM) when the doping distance increases further, since the double exchange interactions are observed among the 3d orbital of the transition metal, the Cd-5s and the S-3p orbitals are at conduction band minimum. We also found that the total magnetic moment of each ferromagnetic system increases with the order of SC to Mn-doping, the spin polarizability of Cr-doping system is 100%. The estimated Curie temperature indicates that the Cr- and Mn-doped CdS in this paper can achieve room-temperature ferromagnetic characteristics, especially the Cr doping is the most prominent. And TM-doping does not destroy the semiconductor characteristics of the system. Therefore, the TM-doped CdS can be used as an ideal dilute magnetic semiconductor functional material.
Zhongqiang Suo(索忠强), Jianfeng Dai(戴剑锋), Shanshan Gao(高姗姗), and Haoran Gao(高浩然)$ Influence of transition metals (Sc, Ti, V, Cr, and Mn) doping on magnetism of CdS 2020 Chin. Phys. B 29 117502
Fig. 1.
Supercell (2 × 2 × 2) model of pure (a) and doped CdS [(b)–(e)]. Magenta, cyan, and yellow are Cd, doping atoms, and S, respectively.
Fig. 2.
The volumes of each system after structural optimizations.
Fig. 3.
The EF of each doping system.
Structure
Mag/μB
TM1/μB
TM2/μB
Sc1
0.938
0.301
0.272
Sc2
0.891
0.257
0.257
Sc3
0
0.160
−0.159
Sc4
0
0.216
−0.216
Ti1
0
1.238
1.239
Ti2
−3.989
1.466
1.466
Ti3
3.996
1.492
1.482
Ti4
3.987
1.487
1.487
V1
0
2.436
−2.437
V2
5.950
2.410
2.410
V3
5.949
2.427
2.416
V4
5.859
2.443
2.443
Cr1
0
3.442
−3.442
Cr2
8.004
3.478
3.479
Cr3
7.996
3.485
3.465
Cr4
7.999
3.489
3.487
Mn1
0
4.190
−4.189
Mn2
10.000
4.157
4.227
Mn3
9.998
4.166
4.164
Mn4
9.912
4.174
4.174
Table 1.
The magnetic moment of each system and net magnetic moment of the TM atom. The minus sign denotes spin-down.
Fig. 4.
The partial electron density at CBM and the charge density differential distribution: (a) pure, (b) Ti1, (c) Ti2, (d) Ti3, and (e) Ti4.
Fig. 5.
The partial density of states (PDOS) for each system.
Fig. 6.
The total density of states (TDOS) and PDOS of the pure (a), Sc2 (b), Ti2 (c), V2 (d), Cr2 (e), and Mn2 (f) structures.
Fig. 7.
Energy band structures of pure (a), Sc2 (b), Ti2 (c), V2 (d), Cr2 (e), and Mn2 (f) structures. Red and blue indicates spin-up and spin-down, respectively.
System
Jdd/meV
Nsd/eV
Npd/eV
Δ E/meV
Coupling
Tc/K
Sc1
21.16
0.78
0.11
38.47
FM
297
Sc2
2.61
0.64
0.21
4.39
FM
34
Sc3
–
–
–
−7.47
AFM
–
Sc4
–
–
–
−17.22
AFM
–
Ti1
–
–
–
−4.18
AFM
–
Ti2
1.03
0.18
0.06
10.58
FM
81
Ti3
0.62
0.21
0.05
12.28
FM
95
Ti4
3.07
0.11
0.06
61.10
FM
472
V1
–
–
–
−30.46
AFM
–
V2
0.01
2.82
0.18
0.09
FM
1
V3
0.02
2.81
0.10
0.70
FM
5
V4
0.01
2.84
0.21
0.18
FM
2
Cr1
–
–
–
0.10
AFM
–
Cr2
5.17
2.30
1.96
372.78
FM
*
Cr3
6.34
3.73
0.14
455.96
FM
*
Cr4
6.49
3.78
0.27
467.02
FM
*
Mn1
–
–
–
50.35
AFM
–
Mn2
0.74
0.10
0.01
81.01
FM
627
Mn3
0.94
0.38
0.09
103.18
FM
798
Mn4
0.47
0.02
0.01
50.56
FM
391
Table 2.
Magnetic performance-related parameters. The star * means more than 1000.
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.