|
|
|
Simulations of superconducting quantum gates by digital flux tuner for qubits |
| Xiao Geng(耿霄)1,2,†, Kaiyong He(何楷泳)1,2, Jianshe Liu(刘建设)1,2, and Wei Chen(陈炜)1,2,3,‡ |
1 Laboratory of Superconducting Quantum Information Processing, School of Integrated Circuits, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China;
2 Beijing Innovation Center for Future Chips, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China;
3 Beijing National Research Center for Information Science and Technology, Beijing 100084, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract The interconnection bottleneck caused by limitations of cable number, inner space and cooling power of dilution refrigerators has been an outstanding challenge for building scalable superconducting quantum computers with the increasing number of qubits in quantum processors. To surmount such an obstacle, it is desirable to integrate qubits with quantum-classical interface (QCI) circuits based on rapid single flux quantum (RSFQ) circuits. In this work, a digital flux tuner for qubits (DFTQ) is proposed for manipulating flux of qubits as a crucial part of the interface circuit. A schematic diagram of the DFTQ is presented, consisting of a coarse tuning unit and a fine-tuning unit for providing magnetic flux with different precision to qubits. The method of using DFTQ to provide flux for gate operations is discussed from the optimization of circuit design and input signal. To verify the effectiveness of the method, simulations of a single DFTQ and quantum gates including a $Z$ gate and an iSWAP gate with DFTQs are performed for flux-tunable transmons. The quantum process tomography corresponding to the two gates is also carried out to analyze the sources of gate error. The results of tomography show that the gate fidelities independent of the initial states of the $Z$ gate and the iSWAP gate are 99.935% and 99.676%, respectively. With DFTQs inside, the QCI would be a powerful tool for building large-scale quantum computers.
|
Received: 19 December 2023
Revised: 30 April 2024
Accepted manuscript online: 06 May 2024
|
|
PACS:
|
03.67.-a
|
(Quantum information)
|
| |
03.67.Lx
|
(Quantum computation architectures and implementations)
|
| |
85.25.Am
|
(Superconducting device characterization, design, and modeling)
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
Xiao Geng, Wei Chen
E-mail: gengx19@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn;weichen@mail.tsinghua.edu.cn
|
Cite this article:
Xiao Geng(耿霄), Kaiyong He(何楷泳), Jianshe Liu(刘建设), and Wei Chen(陈炜) Simulations of superconducting quantum gates by digital flux tuner for qubits 2024 Chin. Phys. B 33 070305
|
[1] Krantz P, Kjaergaard M, Yan F, Orlando T P, Gustavsson S and Oliver W D 2019 Appl. Phys. Rev. 6 021318
[2] Bardin J C, Slichter D H and Reilly D J 2021 IEEE J. Microwaves 1 403
[3] Google Quantum A I 2023 Nature 614 676
[4] Gong M, Wang S, Zha C, et al. 2021 Science 372 948
[5] Arute F, Arya K, Babbush R, et al. 2019 Nature 574 505
[6] Xue X, Patra B, van Dijk J P G, et al. 2021 Nature 593 205
[7] Likharev K K and Semenov V K 1991 IEEE T. Appl. Supercon. 1 3
[8] Opremcak A, Pechenezhskiy I V, Howington C, et al. 2018 Science 361 1239
[9] Liu C H, Ballard A, Olaya D, et al. 2023 PRX Quantum 4 030310
[10] McDermott R, Vavilov M G, Plourde B L T, Wilhelm F K, Liebermann P J, Mukhanov O A and Ohki T A 2018 Quantum Sci. Technol. 3 024004
[11] McDermott R and Vavilov M G 2014 Phys. Rev. Appl. 2 014007
[12] Vozhakov V, Bastrakova M, Klenov N, Satanin A and Soloviev I 2023 Quantum Sci. Technol. 8 035024
[13] Liu K, Wang Y, Ji B, Gao W, Lin Z and Wang Z 2023 Chin. Phys. B 32 128501
[14] Leonard Jr. E, Beck M A, Nelson J, et al. 2019 Phys. Rev. Appl. 11 014009
[15] Dalgaard M, Motzoi F, Sørensen J J and Sherson J 2020 npj Quantum Inform. 6 6
[16] Jokar M R, Rines R and Chong F T 2021 IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE), October 17-22, 2021, Broomfield, USA, pp. 402-412
[17] Jokar M R, Rines R and Chong F T 2022 IEEE International Symposium on High-Performance Computer Architecture (HPCA), April 2-6, 2022, Seoul, Korea, pp. 400-414
[18] Wang Y F, Gao W P, Liu K, Ji B, Wang Z and Lin Z R 2023 Phys. Rev. Appl. 19 044031
[19] Koch J, Yu T M, Gambetta J, Houck A A, Schuster D I, Majer J, Blais A, Devoret M H, Girvin S M and Schoelkopf R J 2007 Phys. Rev. A 76 042319
[20] Barends R, Kelly J, Megrant A, et al. 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 080502
[21] Geng X, He K, Liu J and Chen W 2023 Front. Phys. Lausanne 11 1215468
[22] Yan F, Krantz P, Sung Y, Kjaergaard M, Campbell D L, Orlando T P, Gustavsson S and Oliver W D 2018 Phys. Rev. Appl. 10 054062
[23] Rasmussen S E, Christensen K S, Pedersen S P, Kristensen L B, Bækkegaard T, Loft N J S and Zinner N T 2021 PRX Quantum 2 040204
[24] Likharev K K 1986 Dynamics of Josephson Junctions and Circuits (London: CRC Press) p. 6
[25] He K, Dai G, Yu Q, He Y, Zhao C, Liu J and Chen W 2023 Supercond. Sci. Technol. 36 045010
[26] Johansson J R, Nation P D and Nori F 2012 Comput. Phys. Commun. 183 1760
[27] Johansson J R, Nation P D and Nori F 2013 Comput. Phys. Commun. 184 1234
[28] Tibbetts K W M, Brif C, Grace M D, Donovan A, Hocker D L, Ho T, Wu R and Rabitz H 2012 Phys. Rev. A 86 062309
[29] Nielsen M A and Chuang Isaac L 2010 Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) p. 389
[30] Chuang I L and Nielsen M A 1997 J. Mod. Optic. 44 2455
[31] Chow J M, Gambetta J M, Tornberg L, Koch J, Bishop L S, Houck A A, Johnson B R, Frunzio L, Girvin S M and Schoelkopf R J 2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 090502
[32] Nielsen M A 2002 Phys. Lett. A 303 249
[33] Horodecki M, Horodecki P and Horodecki R 1999 Phys. Rev. A 60 1888
[34] Barends R, Quintana C M, Petukhov A G, et al. 2019 Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 210501 |
| No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|
