CONDENSED MATTER: ELECTRONIC STRUCTURE, ELECTRICAL, MAGNETIC, AND OPTICAL PROPERTIES |
Prev
Next
|
|
|
Interfacial properties of g-C3N4/TiO2 heterostructures studied by DFT calculations |
Chen-Shan Peng(彭春山)1,2, Yong-Dong Zhou(周永东)1, Sui-Shuan Zhang(张虽栓)1,2, and Zong-Yan Zhao(赵宗彦)1,† |
1 Faculty of Materials Science and Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650093, China; 2 Department of Architectural Engineering, Henan Quality Polytechnic, Pingdingshan 467000, China |
|
|
Abstract Constructing the hetrostructure is a feasible strategy to enhance the performances of photocatalysts. However, there are still some fundamental details and mechanisms for the specific design of photocatalysts with heterostructure, which need further confirming and explain. In this work, g-C3N4-based heterostructures are constructed with TiO2 in different ways, and their intrinsic factors to improve the photocatalytic activity are systematically studied by density functional theory (DFT). When g-C3N4 combines horizontally with TiO2 to form a heterostructure, the interaction between them is dominated by van der Waals interaction. Although the recombination of photo-generated electron-hole pair cannot be inhibited significantly, this van der Waals interaction can regulate the electronic structures of the two components, which is conducive to the participation of photo-generated electrons and holes in the photocatalytic reaction. When the g-C3N4 combines vertically with TiO2 to form a heterostructure, their interface states show obvious covalent features, which is very beneficial for the photo-generated electrons' and holes' transport along the opposite directions on both sides of the interface. Furthermore, the built-in electric field of g-C3N4/TiO2 heterostructure is directed from TiO2 layer to g-C3N4 layer under equilibrium, so the photo-generated electron-hole pairs can be spatially separated from each other. These calculated results show that no matter how g-C3N4 and TiO2 are combined together, the g-C3N4/TiO2 heterostructure can enhance the photocatalytic performance through corresponding ways.
|
Received: 03 June 2020
Revised: 07 August 2020
Accepted manuscript online: 27 August 2020
|
PACS:
|
71.20.-b
|
(Electron density of states and band structure of crystalline solids)
|
|
71.20.Nr
|
(Semiconductor compounds)
|
|
81.05.Hd
|
(Other semiconductors)
|
|
82.20.Wt
|
(Computational modeling; simulation)
|
|
Fund: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11964015). |
Corresponding Authors:
†Corresponding author. E-mail: zzy@kust.edu.cn
|
Cite this article:
Chen-Shan Peng(彭春山), Yong-Dong Zhou(周永东), Sui-Shuan Zhang(张虽栓), and Zong-Yan Zhao(赵宗彦) Interfacial properties of g-C3N4/TiO2 heterostructures studied by DFT calculations 2021 Chin. Phys. B 30 017101
|
1 Wang X, Maeda K, Thomas A, Takanabe K, Xin G, Carlsson J M, Domen K and Antonietti M 2009 Nat. Mater. 8 76 2 Lee H L, Sofer Z, Mazanek V, Luxa J, Chua C K and Pumera M 2017 Appl. Mater. Today 8 150 3 Lu X, Jin Y, Zhang X, Xu G, Wang D, Lv J, Zheng Z and Wu Y 2016 Dalton Transactions 45 15406 4 Mamba G and Mishra A 2016 Appl. Catalysis B: Environmental 198 347 5 Ye S, Wang R, Wu M Z and Yuan Y P 2015 Appl. Surf. Sci. 358 15 6 Zhang Q, Hu S, Fan Z, Liu D, Zhao Y, Ma H and Li F 2016 Dalton Transactions 45 3497 7 Zheng Y, Lin L, Wang B and Wang X 2015 Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54 12868 8 Zheng Y, Liu J, Liang J, Jaroniec M and Qiao S Z2012 Energy & Environmental Science 5 6717 9 Han Q, Wang B, Gao J, Cheng Z, Zhao Y, Zhang Z and Qu L 2016 ACS Nano 10 2745 10 Zhang M, Yao W, Lv Y, Bai X, Liu Y, Jiang W and Zhu Y 2014 J. Mater. Chem. A 2 11432 11 Zhang P, Li X, Shao C and Liu Y 2015 J. Mater. Chem. A 3 3281 12 Wang K, Li Q, Liu B, Cheng B, Ho W and Yu J 2015 Appl. Catalysis B: Environmental 176 44 13 Wang Y, Zhang J, Wang X, Antonietti M and Li H 2010 Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 49 3356 14 Liu Q and Zhang J 2013 Langmuir 29 3821 15 Yue B, Li Q, Iwai H, Kako T and Ye J 2011 Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 12 034401 16 Amrollahi R, Hamdy M S and Mul G 2014 J. Catalysis 319 194 17 Qu A, Xu X, Xie H, Zhang Y, Li Y and Wang J 2016 Mater. Res. Bull. 80 167 18 Dai K, Lu L, Liang C, Zhu G, Liu Q, Geng L and He J 2015 Dalton Transactions 44 7903 19 Hao R, Wang G, Jiang C, Tang H and Xu Q 2017 Appl. Sur. Sci. 411 400 20 Hao X, Zhou J, Cui Z, Wang Y, Wang Y and Zou Z 2018 Appl. Catalysis B: Environmental 229 41 21 Jiang L, Yuan X, Zeng G, Liang J, Chen X, Yu H, Wang H, Wu Z, Zhang J and Xiong T 2018 Appl. Catalysis B: Environmental 227 376 22 Jo W K and Selvam N C S 2015 J. Hazardous Mater. 299 462 23 Low J, Cheng B and Yu J 2017 Appl. Surf. Sci. 392 658 24 Wen J, Li X, Liu W, Fang Y, Xie J and Xu Y 2015 Chin. J. Catalysis 36 2049 25 Xu J, Li Y, Zhou X, Li Y, Gao Z D, Song Y Y and Schmuki P 2016 Chemistry-A European Journal 22 3947 26 Han C, Wang Y, Lei Y, Wang B, Wu N, Shi Q and Li Q 2015 Nano Res. 8 1199 27 Pan C, Jia J, Hu X, Fan J and Liu E 2018 Appl. Surf. Sci. 430 283 28 Fu M, Pi J, Dong F, Duan Q and Guo H 2013 Int. J. Photoenergy 2013 158496 29 Ren B, Wang T, Qu G, Deng F, Liang D, Yang W and Liu M 2018 Environmental Science and Pollution Research 25 19122 30 Liu H, Zhang Z G, He H W, Wang X X, Zhang J, Zhang Q Q, Tong Y F, Liu H L, Ramakrishna S and Yan S Y 2018 Nanomaterials 8 842 31 Tan Y, Shu Z, Zhou J, Li T, Wang W and Zhao Z 2018 Appl. Catalysis B: Environmental 230 260 32 Hao R, Wang G, Tang H, Sun L, Xu C and Han D 2016 Appl. Catalysis B: Environmental 187 47 33 Xiao G, Xu S, Li P and Su H 2018 Nanotechnology 29 315601 34 Chen Y, Huang W, He D, Situ Y and Huang H 2014 ACS Appl. Mater. Inter. 6 14405 35 Perdew J P, Ruzsinszky A, Csonka G I, Vydrov O A, Scuseria G E, Constantin L A, Zhou X and Burke K 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 136406 36 Clark S J, Segall M D, Pickard C J, Hasnip P J, Probert M I, Refson K and Payne M C 2005 Zeitschrift für Kristallographie-Crystalline Mater. 220 567 37 Perdew J, Burke K and Ernzerhof M 1996 Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 3865 38 Tkatchenko A and Scheffler M 2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 073005 39 Pfrommer B G, C\oté M, Louie S G and Cohen M L 1997 J. Comput. Phys. 131 233 40 Wu Y, Liu L M, An X and Wei T 2019 New J. Chem. 43 4511 41 Ar S R, Wilson H M, Momin B M, Annapure U S and Jha N 2020 Appl. Surf. Sci. 528 146930 42 Liu M, Wei S, Chen W, Gao L, Li X, Mao L and Dang H 2020 J. Chin. Chem. Soc-taip 67 246 43 Noda C, Asakura Y, Shiraki K, Yamakata A and Yin S 2020 Chem. Eng. J. 390 124616 44 Wu Z, Liang Y, Yuan X, Zou D, Fang J, Jiang L, Zhang J, Yang H and Xiao Z 2020 Chem. Eng. J. 394 124921 |
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|