|
|
Effect of weak measurement on quantum correlations |
L Jebli1, †, M Amzioug4,5, S E Ennadifi4, N Habiballah2,3, and M Nassik1$ |
1 EPTHE, Department of Physics, Faculty of Sciences, Ibn Zohr University, Agadir, Morocco 2 Faculty of Applied Sciences, Ibn Zohr University, Ait-Melloul, Morocco 3 Abdus Salam International Center for Theoretical Physics, Strada Costiera, 11 I-34151, Trieste, Italy 4 LHEP-MS, Department of Physics, Faculty of Science Mohammed V University, Rabat, Morocco 5 Department of Physics, Ecole Normale Sup´eieure (ENS), Mohammed V University, Rabat, Morocco |
|
|
Abstract We investigate the local quantum uncertainty (LQU ) in weak measurement. An expression of weak LQU is explicitly determined. Also, we consider some cases of three special X states, Werner state, circulant two-qubit states, and Heisenberg model via LQU in normal and weak measurements. We find that the LQU in weak measurement is weaker than the case of strong measurement.
|
Received: 21 April 2020
Revised: 29 June 2020
Accepted manuscript online: 15 July 2020
|
Corresponding Authors:
†Corresponding author. E-mail: vitto.han@gmail.com
|
Cite this article:
L Jebli, M Amzioug, S E Ennadifi, N Habiballah, and M Nassik$ Effect of weak measurement on quantum correlations 2020 Chin. Phys. B 29 110301
|
[1] |
Einstein A, Podolsky B, Rosen N 1935 Phys. Rev. 47 777
|
[2] |
Schrodinger E 1935 Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 31 555
|
[3] |
Bell J S 1964 Physics 1 195
|
[4] |
Braginsky V B, Khalili F Y 1992 Quantum Measurement Cambridge Cambridge University Press
|
[5] |
Wiseman H M, Milburn G J 2009 Cambridge Cambridge University Press
|
[6] |
Aharonov Y, Albert D Z, Vaidman L 1988 Phys. Rev. Lett. 60 1351
|
[7] |
Oreshkov O, Brun T A 2005 Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 110409
|
[8] |
Wiseman H M 2003 Phys. Lett. A 311 285
|
[9] |
Mir R, Lundeen J S, Mitchell M W et al. 2007 New J. Phys. 9 287
|
[10] |
Williams N S, Jordan A N 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 026804
|
[11] |
Palacios-Laloy A, Mallet F, Nguyen F et al. 2010 Nature Phys. 6 442
|
[12] |
Lundeen J S, Steinberg A M 2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 020404
|
[13] |
Hosten O, Kwiat P 2008 Science 319 787
|
[14] |
Dixon P B, Starling D J, Jordan A N et al. 2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 173601
|
[15] |
Smith G A, Chaudhury S, Silberfarb A et al. 2004 Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 163602
|
[16] |
Lundeen J S, Sutherland B, Patel A et al. 2011 Nature 474 188
|
[17] |
Kim Y S et al. 2012 Nat. Phys. 8 117
|
[18] |
Modi K, Paterek T, Son W, Vedral V 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 104 080501
|
[19] |
Girolami D, Tufarelli T, Adesso G 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 240402
|
[20] |
Wigner E P, Yanase M M 1963 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 49 910
|
[21] |
Sen A, Sarkar D, Bhar A 2013 Quantum Inf. Process. 12 3007
|
[22] |
Luo S 2003 Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 180403
|
[23] |
Bogaert P, Girolami D 2017 159 179
|
[24] |
Luo S 2003 Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 132 885
|
[25] |
Jebli L, Benzimoun B, Daoud M 2017 Int. J. Quantum Inf. 14 1750020
|
[26] |
Luo S 2008 Phys. Rev. A 77 042303
|
[27] |
Jebli L, Benzimoun B, Daoud M 2017 Int. J. Quantum Inf. 15 1750001
|
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|