|
|
Dynamics of super-quantum discord and direct control with weak measurement in open quantum system |
Ji Ying-Hua (嵇英华)a b |
a Department of Physics, Jiangxi Normal University, Nanchang 330022, China; b Key Laboratory of Photoelectronics and Telecommunication of Jiangxi Province, Nanchang 330022, China |
|
|
Abstract Super-quantum discord (SQD) with weak measurement is regarded as a kind of quantum correlation in quantum information processing. We compare and analyze the dynamical evolutions of SQD, quantum discord (QD), and quantum entanglement (QE) between two qubits in the correlated dephasing environmental model. The results indicate that (i) owing to the much smaller influence of weak measurement on the coherence of the system than that of von Neumann projection measurement, SQD with weak measurement is larger than QD, and (ii) dynamical evolution of QD or QE monotonically goes to zero with time, while SQD monotonically tends to a stable value and a freezing phenomenon occurs. The stable value after freezing mainly depends on the measurement strength and the purity of the initial quantum state.
|
Received: 29 April 2015
Revised: 31 July 2015
Accepted manuscript online:
|
PACS:
|
03.65.Ta
|
(Foundations of quantum mechanics; measurement theory)
|
|
03.65.Ud
|
(Entanglement and quantum nonlocality)
|
|
03.67.-a
|
(Quantum information)
|
|
Fund: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11264015). |
Corresponding Authors:
Ji Ying-Hua
E-mail: jyh2006@jxnu.edu.cn
|
Cite this article:
Ji Ying-Hua (嵇英华) Dynamics of super-quantum discord and direct control with weak measurement in open quantum system 2015 Chin. Phys. B 24 120302
|
[1] |
Datta A, Zhang L J, Nunn J, Langford N K, Feito A, Plenio M B and Walmsley I A 2012 Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 060502
|
[2] |
Ji Y H, Liu Y M and Wang Z S 2011 Chin. Phys. B 20 070304
|
[3] |
Matsuzaki Y and Nakano H 2012 Phys. Rev. B 86 184501
|
[4] |
Aharonov Y, Albert D Z and Vaidman L 1988 Phys. Rev. Lett. 60 1351
|
[5] |
Pryde G J, O' Brien J L, White A G, Ralph T C and Wiseman H M 2005 Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 220405
|
[6] |
Korotkov A N and Jordan A N 2006 Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 166805
|
[7] |
Katz N, Neeley M, Ansmaim M, Bialczak R C, Hofheinz M, Lucero E, O'Connell A, Wang H, Cleland A N, Martinis J M and Korotkov A N 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 200401
|
[8] |
Dixon P B, Starling D J, Jordan A N and Howell J C 2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 173601
|
[9] |
Howell J C, Starling D J, Dixon P B, Vudyasetu P K and Jordan A N 2010 Phys. Rev. A 81 033813
|
[10] |
Lundeen J S 2011 Nature 474 188
|
[11] |
Li B, Chen L and Fan H 2014 Phys. Lett. A 378 1249
|
[12] |
Kim Y S, Lee J C, Kwon O and Kim Y H 2012 Nat. Phys. 8 117
|
[13] |
Man Z X, Xia Y J and An B N 2014 Phys. Rev. A 89 013852
|
[14] |
Man Z X, Xia Y J and An B N 2012 Phys. Rev. A 86 052322
|
[15] |
Man Z X, An B N and Xia Y J 2014 Ann. Phys. 349 209
|
[16] |
Behzadi N 2013 Quantum Inf. Process. 12 21
|
[17] |
Ali M, Rau A R P and Alber G 2010 Phys. Rev. A 81 042105
|
[18] |
Jin J S, Yu C S, Pei P and Song H S 2010 J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 27 1799
|
[19] |
Ollivier H and Zurek W H 2001 Phys. Rev. Lett. 88 017901
|
[20] |
Luo S L 2008 Phys. Rev. A 77 022301
|
[21] |
Luo S L and Fu S 2011 Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 120401
|
[22] |
Luo S L 2008 Phys. Rev. A 77 042303
|
[23] |
Berta M, Christandl M, Colbeck R, Renes J M and Renner R 2010 Nat. Phys. 6 659
|
[24] |
Xiao X and Feng M 2011 Phys. Rev. A 83 054301
|
[25] |
Jin J S, Yu C S, Pei P and Song H S 2010 J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 27 1799
|
[26] |
Wang Y K, Ma T, Fan H, Fei S M and Wang Z X 2014 Quantum Inf. Process. 13 283
|
[27] |
Singh U and Pati A K 2014 Ann. Phys. 343 141
|
[28] |
Ban M 2009 Phys. Rev. A 80 032114
|
[29] |
Lingblad G 1976 Commun. Math. Phys. 48 119
|
[30] |
Wootters W K 1998 Phys. Rev. Lett. 80 2245
|
[31] |
Brariczyk A M, Mendonya P E M F, Gilchrist A, Doherty A C and Bartlett S D 2007 Phys. Rev. A 75 012329
|
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|