|
|
Dense coding capacity in correlated noisy channels with weak measurement |
Jin-Kai Li(李进开), Kai Xu(徐凯), and Guo-Feng Zhang(张国锋)† |
School of Physics, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China |
|
|
Abstract Capacity of dense coding via correlated noisy channel is greater than that via uncorrelated noisy channel. It is shown that the weak measurement and reversal measurement need to further improve their quantum dense coding capacity in correlated amplitude damping channel, but this improvement is very small in correlated phase damping channel and correlated depolarizing channel.
|
Received: 22 February 2021
Revised: 19 March 2021
Accepted manuscript online: 30 March 2021
|
PACS:
|
03.65.Ud
|
(Entanglement and quantum nonlocality)
|
|
03.67.Hk
|
(Quantum communication)
|
|
05.40.Ca
|
(Noise)
|
|
89.70.Kn
|
(Channel capacity and error-correcting codes)
|
|
Fund: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 12074027). |
Corresponding Authors:
Guo-Feng Zhang
E-mail: gf1978zhang@buaa.edu.cn
|
Cite this article:
Jin-Kai Li(李进开), Kai Xu(徐凯), and Guo-Feng Zhang(张国锋) Dense coding capacity in correlated noisy channels with weak measurement 2021 Chin. Phys. B 30 110302
|
[1] Bennett C H and Wiesner S J 1992 Phys. Rev. Lett. 69 2881 [2] Mattle K, Weinfurter H, Kwiat P G and Zeilinger A 1996 Phys. Rev. Lett. 76 4656 [3] Bruß D, D'Ariano G M, Lewenstein M, Macchiavello C, Sen De A and Sen U 2004 Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 210501 [4] Bruß D, D'Ariano G M, Lewenstein M, Macchiavello C, Sen De A and Sen U 2006 Int. J. Quantum Inf. 4 415 [5] Barenco A and Ekert A 1995 J. Mod. Opt. 42 1253 [6] Hausladen P, Jozsa R, Schumacher B, Westmoreland M and Wootters W K 1996 Phys. Rev. A 54 1869 [7] Luo Y H, Zhong H S, Manuel Erhard, Wang X L, Peng L C, Mario Krenn, Jiang X, Li L, Liu N L, Lu C Y, Anton Zeilinger and Pan J W 2019 Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 070505 [8] Braunstein S L and Kimble H J 2000 Phys. Rev. A 61 042302 [9] Shadman Z, Kampermann H, Macchiavello C and Bruß D 2010 New J. Phys. 12 073042 [10] Bose S 2003 Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 207901 [11] Banaszek K, Dragan A, Wasilewski W and Radzewicz C 2004 Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 257901 [12] Paladino E, Faoro L, Falci G and Fazio R 2002 Phys. Rev. Lett. 88 228304 [13] Macchiavello C and Palma G M 2002 Phys. Rev. A 65 050301(R) [14] Hiroshima T 2001 J. Phys. A: Mathe. Gen. 34 6907 [15] Bennett C H, Brassard G, Crepeau C, Jozsa R, Peres A and Wootters W K 1993 Phys. Rev. Lett. 70 1895 [16] Xu K, Zhang G F and Liu W M 2019 Phys. Rev. A 100 052305 [17] Yeo Y and Skeen A 2003 Phys. Rev. A 67 064301 [18] Tian M and Zhang G 2018 Quantum Inf. Process 17 19 [19] Aharonov Y, Albert D Z and Vaidman L 1988 Phys. Rev. Lett. 60 1351 [20] Cheong Y W and Lee S W 2012 Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 150402 [21] Katz N, Neeley M, Ansmann M, Bialczak R C, Hofheinz M, Lucero E, O'Connell A, Wang H, Cleland A N, Martinis J M and Korotkov A N 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 200401 |
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|