|
|
Quantum entanglement of an entangled coherent state:Role of particle losses |
Liu Pan (刘盼), Feng Xiao-Min (冯晓敏), Jin Guang-Ri (金光日) |
Department of Physics, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China |
|
|
Abstract We analyze entanglement properties of entangled coherent state (ECS), |α, 0>1,2+|0, α >1,2, with and without photon losses. By separating the coherent state into |α >=c0|0>+, we derive exact results of the logarithmic negativity EN, which quantifies the degree of entanglement between the two bosonic modes. Without particle losses, EN=1 for the N00N state; while for the ECS, EN increases from 0 to 1 as |α|2→∞. In the presence of photon losses, we find that the ECS with large enough photon number is more robust than that of the N00N state. An optimal ECS is obtained by maximizing EN with respect to |α|2.
|
Received: 28 June 2013
Revised: 06 August 2013
Accepted manuscript online:
|
PACS:
|
03.67.Mn
|
(Entanglement measures, witnesses, and other characterizations)
|
|
03.65.Ud
|
(Entanglement and quantum nonlocality)
|
|
42.50.-p
|
(Quantum optics)
|
|
Fund: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11174028), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China (Grant No. 2011JBZ013), and the Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University of China (Grant No. NCET-11-0564). |
Corresponding Authors:
Jin Guang-Ri
E-mail: grjin@bjtu.edu.cn
|
Cite this article:
Liu Pan (刘盼), Feng Xiao-Min (冯晓敏), Jin Guang-Ri (金光日) Quantum entanglement of an entangled coherent state:Role of particle losses 2014 Chin. Phys. B 23 030310
|
[1] |
Braunstein S L and van Loock P 2005 Rev. Mod. Phys. 77 513
|
[2] |
Caves C M 1981 Phys. Rev. D 23 1963
|
[3] |
Yurke B, MacCall S L and Klauder J R 1986 Phys. Rev. A 33 4033
|
[4] |
Giovannetti V, Lloyd S and Maccone L 2011 Nat. Photon. 5 222
|
[5] |
Genoni M G, Olivares S and Paris M G A 2011 Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 153603
|
[6] |
Escher B M, Davidovich L, Zagury N and de Matos Filho R L 2012 Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 190404
|
[7] |
Dorner U et al. 2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 040403
|
[8] |
Joo J, Munro W J and Spiller T P 2011 Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 083601
|
[9] |
Leverrier A and Grangier P 2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 180504
|
[10] |
Grosshans F, van Assche G, Wenger J, Brouri R, Cerf N J and Grangier P 2003 Nature 421 238
|
[11] |
Lance A M, Symul T, Sharma V, Weedbrook C, Ralph T C and Lam P K 2005 Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 180503
|
[12] |
Ralph T C and Lam P K 2009 Nature 3 671
|
[13] |
Sanders B C 1992 Phys. Rev. A 45 6811
|
[14] |
Filip R, Rehácek J and Dusek M 2001 J. Opt. B: Quantum Semiclass. Opt. 3 341
|
[15] |
Jeong H, Kim M S and Lee J 2001 Phys. Rev. A 64 052308
|
[16] |
Wang X 2002 J. Phys. A 35 165
|
[17] |
Tara K, Agarwal G S and Chaturvedi S 1993 Phys. Rev. A 47 5024
|
[18] |
van Enk S J 2003 Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 017902
|
[19] |
Paternostro M, Kim M S and Ham B S 2003 Phys. Rev. A 67 023811
|
[20] |
Kuang L M, Chen Z B and Pan J W 2007 Phys. Rev. A 76 052324
|
[21] |
Yu T and Eberly J H 2009 Science 323 598
|
[22] |
Al-Qasimi A and James D F V 2009 Opt. Lett. 34 268
|
[23] |
Ma J, Huang Y, Wang X and Sun C P 2011 Phys. Rev. A 84 022302
|
[24] |
Liu Q G and Ji X 2012 Acta Phys. Sin. 61 230303 (in Chinese)
|
[25] |
Gerry C C and Knight P L 2005 Introductory Quantum Optics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
|
[26] |
van Enk S J 2005 Phys. Rev. A 72 022308
|
[27] |
Wickert R, Bernardes N K and van Loock 2010 Phys. Rev. A 81 062344
|
[28] |
El Allati A, Hassouni Y and Metwally N 2011 Chin. Phys. B 20 110303
|
[29] |
Lastra F, Romero G, Lopez C E, Zagury N and Retamal J C 2010 Opt. Commun. 283 3825
|
[30] |
Vidal G and Werner R F 2002 Phys. Rev. A 65 032314
|
[31] |
Adesso G, Serafini A and Illuminati F 2004 Phys. Rev. A 70 022318
|
[32] |
Boto A N, Kok P, Abrams D S, Braunstein S L, Williams C P and Dowling J P 2000 Phys. Rev. Lett. 85 2733
|
[33] |
Mitchell M W, Lundeen J S and Steinberg A M 2004 Nature 429 161
|
[34] |
Zhang D H, Zhou D L and Fan H 2011 Chin. Phys. Lett. 27 90306
|
[35] |
Agarwal G S, Chaturvedi S and Rai A 2010 Phys. Rev. A 81 043843
|
[36] |
Helstrom C W 1976 Quantum Detection and Estimation Theory (New York: Academic Press)
|
[37] |
Holevo A S 1982 Probabilistic and Statistical Aspect of Quantum Theory (Pisa: North-Holland Press)
|
[38] |
Braunstein S L and Caves C M 1994 Phys. Rev. Lett. 72 3439
|
[39] |
Pezzé L and Smerzi A 2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 100401
|
[40] |
Zhou B Y, Deng L, Duan Y F, Yu L and Li G X 2012 Chin. Phys. B 21 090302
|
[41] |
Obada A S F, Hessian H A, Mohamed A B A and Hashem M 2012 Chin. Phys. B 21 100310
|
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|