ELECTROMAGNETISM, OPTICS, ACOUSTICS, HEAT TRANSFER, CLASSICAL MECHANICS, AND FLUID DYNAMICS |
Prev
Next
|
|
|
The difference in noise property between the Autler–Townes splitting medium and the electromagnetically induced transparent medium |
Li Zhong-Hua(李中华), Li Yuan(李媛), Dou Ya-Fang(豆亚芳), and Zhang Jun-Xiang(张俊香)† |
State Key Laboratory of Quantum Optics and Quantum Optics Devices, Institute of Opto-Electronics, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, China |
|
|
Abstract The quantum noise of squeezed probe light passing through an atomic system with different electromagnetically induced transparency and Autler-Townes splitting effects is investigated theoretically. It is found that the optimal squeezing preservation of the outgoing probe beam occurs in the strong-coupling-field regime rather than in the weak-coupling-field regime. In the weak-coupling-field regime, which was recently recognized as the electromagnetically induced transparency regime (Abi-Salloum T Y 2010 Phys. Rev. A 81 053836), the output amplitude noise is affected mainly by the atomic noise originating from the random decay process of atoms. While in the strong-coupling-field regime, defined as the Autler-Townes splitting regime, the output amplitude noise is affected mainly by the phase-to-amplitude conversion noise. This is useful in improving the quality of the experiment for efficient quantum memory, and hence has an application in quantum information processing.
|
Received: 10 October 2011
Revised: 09 November 2011
Accepted manuscript online:
|
PACS:
|
42.50.Gy
|
(Effects of atomic coherence on propagation, absorption, and Amplification of light; electromagnetically induced transparency and Absorption)
|
|
42.50.Hz
|
(Strong-field excitation of optical transitions in quantum systems; multiphoton processes; dynamic Stark shift)
|
|
42.50.Lc
|
(Quantum fluctuations, quantum noise, and quantum jumps)
|
|
03.67.-a
|
(Quantum information)
|
|
Fund: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 10974126 and 60821004) and the National Basic Research Program of China (Grant No. 2010CB923102). |
Corresponding Authors:
Zhang Jun-Xiang,junxiang@sxu.edu.cn
E-mail: junxiang@sxu.edu.cn
|
Cite this article:
Li Zhong-Hua(李中华), Li Yuan(李媛), Dou Ya-Fang(豆亚芳), and Zhang Jun-Xiang(张俊香) The difference in noise property between the Autler–Townes splitting medium and the electromagnetically induced transparent medium 2012 Chin. Phys. B 21 034204
|
[1] |
Harris S E, Field J E and Imamovglu A 1990 Phys. Rev. Lett. 64 1107
|
[2] |
Hau L V, Harris S E, Dutton Z and Behroozi C H 1999 Nature 397 594
|
[3] |
Fleischhauer M and Lukin M D 2000 Phys. Rev. Lett. 84 5094
|
[4] |
Luo B, Hang C, Li H J and Huang G X 2010 Chin. Phys. B 19 054214
|
[5] |
Liu C, Dutton Z, Behroozi C H and Hau L V 2001 Nature 409 490
|
[6] |
Phillips D F, Fleischhauer A, Mair A, Walsworth R L and Lukin M D 2001 Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 783
|
[7] |
Julsgaard B, Sherson J, Cirac J I, Fiur醰sek J and Polzik E S 2004 Nature 432 482
|
[8] |
Eisaman M D, Andr? A, Massou F, Fleischhauer M, Zibrov A S and Lukin M D 2005 Nature 438 837
|
[9] |
Chaneli`ere T, Matsukevich D N, Jenkins S D, Lan S Y, Kennedy T A B and Kuzmich A 2005 Nature 438 833
|
[10] |
Choi K S, Deng H, Laurat J and Kimble H J 2008 Nature 452 67
|
[11] |
Honda K, Akamatsu D, Arikawa M, Yokoi Y, Akiba K, Nagatsuka S, Tanimura T, Furusawa A and Kozuma M 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 093601
|
[12] |
Appel J, Figueroa E, Korystov D, Lobino M and Lvovsky A I 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 093602
|
[13] |
H閠et G, Peng A, Johnsson M T, Hope J J and Lam P K 2008 Phys. Rev. A 77 012323
|
[14] |
Cviklinski J, Ortalo J, Laurat J, Bramati A, Pinard M and Giaconino E 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 133601
|
[15] |
Peng A, Johnsson M, Bowen W P, Lam P K, Bachor H A and Hope J J 2005 Phys. Rev. A 71 033809
|
[16] |
Dantan A, Bramati A and Pinard M 2005 Phys. Rev. A 71 043801
|
[17] |
Ding J L, Hou B P and Wang S J 2010 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 43 225502
|
[18] |
Hsu M T L, H閠et G, Glöckl O, Longdell J J, Buchler B C, Bachor H A and Lam P K 2006 Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 183601
|
[19] |
Zhang J X, Cai J, Bai Y F, Gao J R and Zhu S Y 2007 Phys. Rev. A 76 033814
|
[20] |
Abi-Salloum T Y 2010 Phys. Rev. A 81 053836
|
[21] |
Liang Q B, Yang B D, Yang J F, Zhang T C and Wang J M 2010 Chin. Phys. B 19 113207
|
[22] |
Lunnemann P and Mork J 2010 J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 27 2654
|
[23] |
Sheremet A S, Gerasimov L V, Sokolov I M, Kupriyanov D V, Mishina O S, Giacobino E and Laurat J 2010 Phys. Rev. A 82 033838
|
[24] |
Polzik E S, Carri J and Kimble H J 1992 Phys. Rev. Lett. 68 3020
|
[25] |
Camparo J C 1998 J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 15 1177
|
[26] |
Camparo J C and Coffer J G 1999 Phys. Rev. A 59 728
|
[27] |
Bachor H A and Ralph T C 2004 A Guide to Experiments in Quantum Optics (Berlin: Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA) p. 271
|
[28] |
Li Y Q and Xiao M 1995 Phys. Rev. A 51 4959
|
[29] |
Anisimov P M, Dowling J P and Sanders B C 2011 Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 163604
|
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|