Please wait a minute...
Chin. Phys. B, 2026, Vol. 35(4): 040307    DOI: 10.1088/1674-1056/ae00af
GENERAL Prev   Next  

Asymmetric model of the dynamic quantum Cournot duopoly game with asymmetric information and heterogeneous players

Huaxi Chen(陈华鑫) and Wensheng Jia(贾文生)†
State Key Laboratory of Public Big Data, School of Mathematics and Statistics, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China
Abstract  Building on the existing symmetric quantization model of the dynamic Cournot duopoly game (CDG) with asymmetric information, we extend it to an asymmetric quantization model and study the stability of the quantum Bayesian Nash equilibrium (QBNE) under heterogeneous expectations. We analyze the influence of various parameters on the stability of QBNE, with a particular focus on the impact of the parameter $\alpha$ on system stability. The results show that when $\alpha < 1$, under the same parameters, the quantum strategy of the asymmetric quantization model is more favorable for stabilizing the market. However, when $\alpha>1$, the quantum strategy of the symmetric quantization model is more conducive to stabilizing the market.
Keywords:  quantum Cournot games      Bayesian Nash equilibrium      asymmetric quantization scheme      asymmetric information  
Received:  26 June 2025      Revised:  11 August 2025      Accepted manuscript online:  29 August 2025
PACS:  03.67.-a (Quantum information)  
  02.50.Le (Decision theory and game theory)  
  05.45.-a (Nonlinear dynamics and chaos)  
Fund: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 12461054) and the Science and Technology Key Foundation of Guizhou Province, China (Grant No. 2025089).
Corresponding Authors:  Wensheng Jia     E-mail:  wsjia@gzu.edu.cn

Cite this article: 

Huaxi Chen(陈华鑫) and Wensheng Jia(贾文生) Asymmetric model of the dynamic quantum Cournot duopoly game with asymmetric information and heterogeneous players 2026 Chin. Phys. B 35 040307

[1] Meyer D A 1999 Phys. Rev. Lett. 82 1052
[2] Eisert J, Wilkens M and Lewenstein M 1999 Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 3077
[3] Du J F, Li H, Xu X D, Shi M J, Wu J H, Zhou X Y and Han R D 2002 Phys. Rev. Lett. 88 137902
[4] Mitra A, Sivapriya K and Kumar A 2007 J. Magn. Reson. 187 306
[5] Prevedel R, Stefanov A, Walther P and Zeilinger A 2007 New J. Phys. 9 205
[6] Schmid C, Flitney A P,WieczorekW, Kiesel N,Weinfurter H and Hollenberg L C L 2010 New J. Phys. 12 063031
[7] Li H, Du J F and Massar S 2002 Phys. Lett. A 306 73
[8] Du J F, Li H and Ju C Y 2003 Phys. Rev. E 68 016124
[9] Chen X, Qin G, Zhou X and Du J 2005 Chin. Phys. Lett. 22 1033
[10] Frackiewicz P and Sladkowski J 2016 Quantum Inf. Process. 15 3637
[11] Frackiewicz P 2018 Int. J. Theor. Phys. 57 353
[12] Yang Z and Zhang X 2019 Phys. Lett. A 383 2874
[13] Lo C F and Yeung C F 2020 Quantum Inf. Process. 19 373
[14] Shi L and Xu F 2021 Phys. Lett. A 385 126956
[15] Lo C F and Yeung C F 2022 Quantum Inf. Process. 21 85
[16] Wang N F and Yang Z 2023 Phys. Scr. 98 055109
[17] Wang N F and Yang Z 2024 Phys. Scr. 99 045120
[18] Rand D 1978 J. Math. Econ. 5 173
[19] Agiza H N and Elsadany A A 2004 Appl. Math. Comput. 149 843
[20] Yang Z and Gong Q B 2018 Quantum Inf. Process. 17 1
[21] Askar S S 2021 Appl. Math. Comput. 393 125823
[22] Awad A M, Askar S S and Elsadany A A 2022 Nonlinear Dyn. 107 3983
[23] Yu Y 2022 J. Comput. Appl. Math. 413 114399
[24] Chen J 2024 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 57 275301
[25] Kameshwari A V S and Balakrishnan S 2025 Phys. Scr. 100 065206
[26] Zhang X L, Sun D H and Jiang W 2020 Int. J. Quantum Inf. 18 2050029
[27] Shi L and Xu F 2021 Quantum Inf. Process. 20 1
[28] Hu W, Bao C and Dong T 2023 Quantum Inf. Process. 22 445
[29] Harsanyi J C 1967 Manag. Sci. 14 159
[30] Yu W S and Yu Y 2018 Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 63 101
[31] Long J J and Zhao H 2021 Int. J. Bifurcat. Chaos 31 2150240
[32] Wang C, Pi J X, Zhou D, Tang W and Yang G H 2023 Physica A 618 128691
[33] Kang HW, Jin Z Y, LiMY,Wang M, Sun X P, Shen Y, Chen Q Y 2024 Chin. Phys. B 33 030203
[34] Zhou D, Yang H, Pi J X and Yang G H 2023 Phys. Lett. A 483 129033
[35] Chen H X and Jia W S 2025 Quantum Inf. Process. 24 177
[36] Wang X and Hu C Z 2012 Chin. Phys. Lett. 29 120303
[37] Lo C F and Kiang D 2005 Phys. Lett. A 346 65
[38] Liu B Y, Zhao X, Dai H Y, Zhang M, Liao Y, Guo X F and Gao W 2020 Chin. Phys. B 29 070201
[39] Lei Z Z, Liu B Y, Yi Y, Dai H Y and Zhang M 2018 Chin. Phys. B 27 030202
[40] Qin G, Chen X, Sun M, Zhou X Y, Du J F 2005 Phys. Lett. A 340 78
[41] Wang X, Liu D and Zhang J P 2013 Chin. Phys. Lett. 30 120302
[42] Wang X, Shen J and Sheng Z 2020 Phys. Lett. A 384 126644
[43] Zhong Y, Shi L and Xu F 2022 Int. J. Theor. Phys. 61 75
[44] Kaplan J L and Yorke Y A 1979 Commun. Math. Phys. 67 93
[1] New binary quantum stabilizer codes from classical quasi-cyclic codes of index two
Zhen-Hui Zhang(张镇辉), Zhuo Li(李卓), and Li-Juan Xing(邢莉娟). Chin. Phys. B, 2026, 35(4): 040303.
[2] Analysis of urban atmospheric influence on free-space quantum key distribution
Hai-Long Zhang(张海龙), Xing-Ran Chen(陈星燃), and Tan Li(李坦). Chin. Phys. B, 2026, 35(4): 040306.
[3] Measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution with entanglement-assisted linear Bell state measurement
Cheng Zhang(张诚), Cheng Liu(刘成), Jiawei Ying(应佳伟), Shipu Gu(顾世浦), Lan Zhou(周澜), Yin Ma(马寅), Kang Gao(高亢), Hai Wei(魏海), Kai Wen(文凯), and Yubo Sheng(盛宇波). Chin. Phys. B, 2026, 35(4): 040310.
[4] Estimating quantum coherence using limited quantum resources
Bin Zou(邹斌), Kai Wu(吴凯), and Zhihua Chen(陈芝花). Chin. Phys. B, 2026, 35(3): 030301.
[5] Distributed Kuperberg’s algorithm
Peng-Yu Yang(杨鹏宇), Xin Zhang(张新), and Song Lin(林崧). Chin. Phys. B, 2026, 35(3): 030303.
[6] Quantum steering for two-mode states with continuous-variable in laser channel
Kaimin Zheng(郑凯敏), Jifeng Sun(孙继峰), Liyun Hu(胡利云), and Lijian Zhang(张利剑). Chin. Phys. B, 2026, 35(2): 020304.
[7] Rigorous verification of quantum contextuality from anomalous weak value
Wei-Qian Zhao(赵炜骞), Si-Nan Pang(庞斯楠), Zi-Fu Su(苏子富), Tian-Ming Zhao(赵天明), Jin-Dong Wang(王金东), and Ya-Fei Yu(於亚飞). Chin. Phys. B, 2026, 35(2): 020301.
[8] Unveiling the physical meaning of transformer attention in neural network quantum states: A conditional mutual information perspective
Tianyu Ruan(阮天雨), Bowen Kan(阚博文), Yixuan Sun(孙艺轩), Honghui Shang(商红慧), Shihua Zhang(张世华), and Jinlong Yang(杨金龙). Chin. Phys. B, 2026, 35(1): 010301.
[9] Efficient and controlled symmetric and asymmetric Bell-state transfers in a dissipative Jaynes-Cummings model
Qi-Cheng Wu(吴奇成), Yu-Liang Fang(方玉亮), Yan-Hui Zhou(周彦辉), Jun-Long Zhao(赵军龙), Yi-Hao Kang(康逸豪), Qi-Ping Su(苏奇平), and Chui-Ping Yang(杨垂平). Chin. Phys. B, 2026, 35(1): 010304.
[10] Superadiabatic stimulated Raman adiabatic passage between dressed states
Fangzhou Jin(金芳洲), Ao Wang(王奥), Yunlan Ji(季云兰), Hui Zhou(周辉), and Jianpei Geng(耿建培). Chin. Phys. B, 2026, 35(1): 010305.
[11] Preparation of digital-encoded and analog-encoded quantum states corresponding to matrix operations
Kaitian Gao(高凯天), Youlong Yang(杨有龙), and Zhenye Du(杜振叶). Chin. Phys. B, 2026, 35(1): 010202.
[12] Dynamical evolution of imaginarity resources in non-Markovian environments
Hong-Biao Li(李宏彪), Deng-Guo Kong(孔德国), Xue-Ping Chai(柴学平), Jin-Long Yu(余金龙), and Qiang Zheng(郑强). Chin. Phys. B, 2025, 34(11): 110309.
[13] Effect of quantum measurement errors on witnessing network topology
Shu-Yuan Yang(杨舒媛), Kan He(贺衎), and Ming-Xing Luo(罗明星). Chin. Phys. B, 2025, 34(9): 090302.
[14] Mode-pairing quantum key distribution with multi-step advantage distillation
Shizhuo Li(李世卓), Xin Liu(刘馨), Zhenrong Zhang(张振荣), and Kejin Wei(韦克金). Chin. Phys. B, 2025, 34(9): 090307.
[15] Optimal convex approximations of qubit states based on l1-norm of coherence
Li-Qiang Zhang(张立强), Yan-Dong Du(杜彦东), and Chang-Shui Yu(于长水). Chin. Phys. B, 2025, 34(8): 080302.
No Suggested Reading articles found!