|
|
|
Asymmetric model of the dynamic quantum Cournot duopoly game with asymmetric information and heterogeneous players |
| Huaxi Chen(陈华鑫) and Wensheng Jia(贾文生)† |
| State Key Laboratory of Public Big Data, School of Mathematics and Statistics, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Building on the existing symmetric quantization model of the dynamic Cournot duopoly game (CDG) with asymmetric information, we extend it to an asymmetric quantization model and study the stability of the quantum Bayesian Nash equilibrium (QBNE) under heterogeneous expectations. We analyze the influence of various parameters on the stability of QBNE, with a particular focus on the impact of the parameter $\alpha$ on system stability. The results show that when $\alpha < 1$, under the same parameters, the quantum strategy of the asymmetric quantization model is more favorable for stabilizing the market. However, when $\alpha>1$, the quantum strategy of the symmetric quantization model is more conducive to stabilizing the market.
|
Received: 26 June 2025
Revised: 11 August 2025
Accepted manuscript online: 29 August 2025
|
|
PACS:
|
03.67.-a
|
(Quantum information)
|
| |
02.50.Le
|
(Decision theory and game theory)
|
| |
05.45.-a
|
(Nonlinear dynamics and chaos)
|
|
| Fund: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 12461054) and the Science and Technology Key Foundation of Guizhou Province, China (Grant No. 2025089). |
Corresponding Authors:
Wensheng Jia
E-mail: wsjia@gzu.edu.cn
|
Cite this article:
Huaxi Chen(陈华鑫) and Wensheng Jia(贾文生) Asymmetric model of the dynamic quantum Cournot duopoly game with asymmetric information and heterogeneous players 2026 Chin. Phys. B 35 040307
|
[1] Meyer D A 1999 Phys. Rev. Lett. 82 1052 [2] Eisert J, Wilkens M and Lewenstein M 1999 Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 3077 [3] Du J F, Li H, Xu X D, Shi M J, Wu J H, Zhou X Y and Han R D 2002 Phys. Rev. Lett. 88 137902 [4] Mitra A, Sivapriya K and Kumar A 2007 J. Magn. Reson. 187 306 [5] Prevedel R, Stefanov A, Walther P and Zeilinger A 2007 New J. Phys. 9 205 [6] Schmid C, Flitney A P,WieczorekW, Kiesel N,Weinfurter H and Hollenberg L C L 2010 New J. Phys. 12 063031 [7] Li H, Du J F and Massar S 2002 Phys. Lett. A 306 73 [8] Du J F, Li H and Ju C Y 2003 Phys. Rev. E 68 016124 [9] Chen X, Qin G, Zhou X and Du J 2005 Chin. Phys. Lett. 22 1033 [10] Frackiewicz P and Sladkowski J 2016 Quantum Inf. Process. 15 3637 [11] Frackiewicz P 2018 Int. J. Theor. Phys. 57 353 [12] Yang Z and Zhang X 2019 Phys. Lett. A 383 2874 [13] Lo C F and Yeung C F 2020 Quantum Inf. Process. 19 373 [14] Shi L and Xu F 2021 Phys. Lett. A 385 126956 [15] Lo C F and Yeung C F 2022 Quantum Inf. Process. 21 85 [16] Wang N F and Yang Z 2023 Phys. Scr. 98 055109 [17] Wang N F and Yang Z 2024 Phys. Scr. 99 045120 [18] Rand D 1978 J. Math. Econ. 5 173 [19] Agiza H N and Elsadany A A 2004 Appl. Math. Comput. 149 843 [20] Yang Z and Gong Q B 2018 Quantum Inf. Process. 17 1 [21] Askar S S 2021 Appl. Math. Comput. 393 125823 [22] Awad A M, Askar S S and Elsadany A A 2022 Nonlinear Dyn. 107 3983 [23] Yu Y 2022 J. Comput. Appl. Math. 413 114399 [24] Chen J 2024 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 57 275301 [25] Kameshwari A V S and Balakrishnan S 2025 Phys. Scr. 100 065206 [26] Zhang X L, Sun D H and Jiang W 2020 Int. J. Quantum Inf. 18 2050029 [27] Shi L and Xu F 2021 Quantum Inf. Process. 20 1 [28] Hu W, Bao C and Dong T 2023 Quantum Inf. Process. 22 445 [29] Harsanyi J C 1967 Manag. Sci. 14 159 [30] Yu W S and Yu Y 2018 Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 63 101 [31] Long J J and Zhao H 2021 Int. J. Bifurcat. Chaos 31 2150240 [32] Wang C, Pi J X, Zhou D, Tang W and Yang G H 2023 Physica A 618 128691 [33] Kang HW, Jin Z Y, LiMY,Wang M, Sun X P, Shen Y, Chen Q Y 2024 Chin. Phys. B 33 030203 [34] Zhou D, Yang H, Pi J X and Yang G H 2023 Phys. Lett. A 483 129033 [35] Chen H X and Jia W S 2025 Quantum Inf. Process. 24 177 [36] Wang X and Hu C Z 2012 Chin. Phys. Lett. 29 120303 [37] Lo C F and Kiang D 2005 Phys. Lett. A 346 65 [38] Liu B Y, Zhao X, Dai H Y, Zhang M, Liao Y, Guo X F and Gao W 2020 Chin. Phys. B 29 070201 [39] Lei Z Z, Liu B Y, Yi Y, Dai H Y and Zhang M 2018 Chin. Phys. B 27 030202 [40] Qin G, Chen X, Sun M, Zhou X Y, Du J F 2005 Phys. Lett. A 340 78 [41] Wang X, Liu D and Zhang J P 2013 Chin. Phys. Lett. 30 120302 [42] Wang X, Shen J and Sheng Z 2020 Phys. Lett. A 384 126644 [43] Zhong Y, Shi L and Xu F 2022 Int. J. Theor. Phys. 61 75 [44] Kaplan J L and Yorke Y A 1979 Commun. Math. Phys. 67 93 |
| No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|