|
|
|
Analysis of urban atmospheric influence on free-space quantum key distribution |
| Hai-Long Zhang(张海龙)†, Xing-Ran Chen(陈星燃), and Tan Li(李坦) |
| Henan Key Laboratory of Quantum Information and Cryptography, SSF, IEU, Zhengzhou 450001, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Quantum key distribution (QKD) has been widely deployed in practical applications after decades of development. However, the QKD system is easily affected by the external environment, especially free-space QKD. In this text, we examine two scenarios of free-space QKD in urban environments: satellite to ground and intercity. For satellite to ground QKD, the effects of stray light are analyzed. For intercity link, we discuss the influence of sea salt particles in coastal cities, and insoluble and soot particles in inland cities. Our findings indicate that using a telescope with a smaller field of view (FOV) and larger aperture diameters in satellite-to-ground QKD can effectively reduce errors induced by stray light. However, the diameter cannot be increased infinitely, when exceeding 0.8 m, the number of stray photons entering receiver rises rapidly and the quantum bits error rate (QBER) shows no significant reduction. For intercity QKD, the strength of extinction varies with relative humidity and aerosol particle radius, consequently altering channel transmittance. We investigate the impact of sea salt, insoluble particles, and soot on the key rate, finding that under the number density $N=10^6$ m$^{-3}$, sea salt exhibits the strongest impacts on key rate, especially when radius exceed 2.5 μm. The impacts of insoluble particles are weaker and soot is the weakest, which can be ignored until $N$ reaches $10^9$ m$^{-3}$. For larger particle density, we can get higher key rate and further transmission distances in a soot-dominated environment. Our work could provide a valuable reference for the practical implementation of QKD in urban atmospheres.
|
Received: 24 June 2025
Revised: 24 September 2025
Accepted manuscript online: 26 September 2025
|
|
PACS:
|
03.67.Dd
|
(Quantum cryptography and communication security)
|
| |
03.67.Hk
|
(Quantum communication)
|
| |
03.67.-a
|
(Quantum information)
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
Hai-Long Zhang
E-mail: zhhl049@126.com
|
Cite this article:
Hai-Long Zhang(张海龙), Xing-Ran Chen(陈星燃), and Tan Li(李坦) Analysis of urban atmospheric influence on free-space quantum key distribution 2026 Chin. Phys. B 35 040306
|
[1] Yang X L, Li Y Q and Li H W 2025 Chin. Phys. B 34 020301
[2] Bennett C H, Brassard G, et al. 1984 IEEE International Conference on Computers, Systems and Signal Processing
[3] Alessia S, Giulio F, Francesco P, et al. 2022 Quantum Science and Technology 7 045029
[4] Ricklin J, Hammel S, Easton F, et al. 2006 Optic. Fiber. Common. Rep 3 10297
[5] Wang F Z, Du W H, Yuan Q, et al. 2021 Atmosphere 12 121608
[6] Tomasz S 2021 Remote Sensing 13 1654
[7] Vasylyev D, Semenov A A and Vogel W 2016 Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 090501
[8] Stefanie H, Davide O, Leonard V, et al. 2024 Optical Engineering 63 041211
[9] Lu Y, Xu X P, Zhang N, et al. 2024 IEEE Access 12 33948
[10] Mark T G, Michael B F, Brett A S, et al. 2015 Opt. Express 23 23924
[11] Andreas H, Thomas P, Salvador J, et al. 2018 Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer 205 278
[12] Schranz A and Udvary E 2019 Optics and Laser Technology 181
[13] Nelson J M, Ferreira F S, Armando N P, et al. 2010 Journal of Lightwave Technology 29 209643
[14] Wu J C, Zhang L, Jia J J, et al. 2016 Opt. Express 28 10746
[15] Khanna A, Majumder S, Adarsh J, et al. 2024 IET Quantum Communication 5 12081
[16] Tahir M, Sultan M Y, Muhammad S K et al. 2018 Acta Phys. Polonica A 134 275
[17] Papapanos C, Zavitsanos D, Raptakis A, et al. 2020 arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.03358
[18] Argiris N, Nikolaos K L, Aristeidis S, et al. 2024IEEE Aerospace and Electronic Systems Magazine 39 23
[19] Liao S K, et al. 2017 Nat. Photon. 11 509
[20] Wolf S and Voshchinnikov N V 2004 Computer Physics Communications 162 114
[21] Olivier B 2009 Atmospheric Aerosols Properties and Climate Impacts (Berlin: Springer)
[22] Jorg A 1997 American Meteorological Society 15 1043
[23] Du H 2004 Appl. Opt. 43 1951
[24] Bohren C F and Huffman D R 2008 Absorption and Scattering of Light by Small Particles (Germany: John Wiley)
[25] Hess M, Koepke P and Schult I 1998 Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 79 5
[26] Wang X B 2005 Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 230503
[27] Lo H K, Ma X and Chen K 2005 Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 230504
[28] Wang X B 2005 Phys. Rev. A 72 012322
[29] Ma X, Qi B, Zhao Y, et al. 2005 Phys. Rev. A 72 012326
[30] Titos G, Lyamani H, Querol X, et al. 2012 Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 117 D4
[31] Rajae M, Mohammed D and Abdelmoula B 2020 Air Qual Atmos Health 13 25
[32] Ntanos A, Nikolaos K L, et al. 2024 IEEE Aerospace and Electronic Systems Magazine 39 16 |
| No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|
