Abstract In a multi-bubble system, the bubble behavior is modulated by the primary acoustic field and the secondary acoustic field. To explore the translational motion of bubbles in cavitation liquids containing high-concentration cavitation nuclei, evolutions of bubbles are recorded by a high-speed camera, and translational trajectories of several representative bubbles are traced. It is found that translational motion of bubbles is always accompanied by the fragmentation and coalescence of bubbles, and for bubbles smaller than 10 μ, the possibility of bubble coalescence is enhanced when the spacing of bubbles is less than 30 μ. The measured signals and their spectra show the presence of strong negative pressure, broadband noise, and various harmonics, which implies that multiple interactions of bubbles appear in the region of high-intensity cavitation. Due to the strong coupling effect, the interaction between bubbles is random. A simplified triple-bubble model is developed to explore the interaction patterns of bubbles affected by the surrounding bubbles. Patterns of bubble interaction, such as attraction, repulsion, stable spacing, and rebound of bubbles, can be predicted by the theoretical analysis, and the obtained results are in good agreement with experimental observations. Mass exchange between the liquid and bubbles as well as absorption in the cavitation nuclei also plays an important role in multi-bubble cavitation, which may account for the weakening of the radial oscillations of bubbles.
Received: 23 August 2023
Revised: 19 October 2023
Accepted manuscript online: 26 October 2023
PACS:
43.35.+d
(Ultrasonics, quantum acoustics, and physical effects of sound)
Fund: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 11974232 and 12374441) and the Fund from the Yulin Science and Technology Bureau, China (Grant No. CXY-2022-178).
Corresponding Authors:
Cheng-Hui Wang, Shi Chen
E-mail: wangld001@snnu.edu.cn;chenshi@snnu.edu.cn
Cite this article:
Chen-Yang Huang(黄晨阳), Fan Li(李凡), Shi-Yi Feng(冯释毅), Cheng-Hui Wang(王成会), Shi Chen(陈时), Jing Hu(胡静), Xin-Rui He(何芯蕊), and Jia-Kai Song(宋家凯) Behaviors of cavitation bubbles driven by high-intensity ultrasound 2024 Chin. Phys. B 33 024301
[1] Ida M, Naoe T and Futakawa M 2007 Phys. Rev. E76 046309 [2] Shen Y, Zhang L, Wu Y and Chen W 2021 Ultrason. Sonochem.73 105535 [3] Li T, Zhang A M, Wang S P, Chen G Q and Li S 2019 Phys. Fluids31 092108 [4] Morton J A, Khavari M, Priyadarshi A, Kaur A, Grobert N, Mi J, Porfyrakis K, Prentice P, Eskin D G and Tzanakis I 2023 Phys. Fluids35 017135 [5] Yamakoshi Y, Ozawa Y, Ida M and Masuda N 2001 Jpn. J. Appl. Phys.40 3852 [6] Cui P, Zhang A M and Wang S P 2021 Ocean Eng.234 109175 [7] Haghi H, Sojahrood A J and Kolios M C 2019 Ultrason. Sonochem.58 104708 [8] Goh B H T, Ohl S W, Klaseboer E and Khoo B C 2014 Phys. Fluids26 221 [9] Van Der Kroon I, Quinto-Su P A, Li F and Ohl C D 2010 Phys. Rev. E82 066311 [10] Yamamoto T and Komarov S V 2021 Ultrason. Sonochem.78 105734 [11] Lanoy M, Derec C, Tourin A and Leroy V 2015 Appl. Phys. Lett.107 214101 [12] Doinikov A A 2001 Phys. Rev. E64 026301 [13] Doinikov A A 2004 J. Acoust. Soc. Am.116 821 [14] Zilonova E, Solovchuk M and Sheu T W H 2019 Phys. Rev. E99 023109 [15] Wang X, Chen W, Zhou M, Zhang Z and Zhang L 2022 Ultrason. Sonochem.84 105952 [16] Žnidarčič A, Mettin R and Dular M 2015 Ultrason. Sonochem.22 482 [17] Yasui K, Iida Y, Tuziuti T, Kozuka T and Towata A 2008 Phys. Rev. E77 016609 [18] Žnidarčič A, Mettin R, Cairós C and Dular M 2014 Phys. Fluids26 023304 [19] Birkin P R, Offin D G, Vian C J B and Leighton T G 2011 J. Acoust. Soc. Am.130 3379 [20] Dubus B, Vanhille C, Campos-Pozuelo C and Granger C 2010 Ultrason. Sonochem.17 810 [21] Versluis M, Schmitz B, Von der Heydt A and Lohse D 2000 Science.289 2114 [22] Ida M 2009 Phys. Rev. E79 016307 [23] Shaw S J 2017 Phys. Fluids29 122103 [24] Wu Y, Chen W, Zhang L, Shen Y and Zhao G 2022 J. Acoust. Soc. Am.151 888 [25] Lawless J, Keeler J, Gaillard A, Hazel A and Juel A 2022 Sci. Rep.12 20752 [26] Nguyen Q T, Nguyen V T, Phan T H, Duy T N, Park S H and Park W G 2023 Phys. Fluids35 013306 [27] Yasui K 1996 J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.65 2830 [28] Al Bishtawi B, Mustapha K B and Scribano G 2022 Phys. Fluids34 113303 [29] Yasui K 2023 Ultrason. Sonochem.93 106276 [30] Tzanakis I, Lebon G S B, Eskin D G and Pericleous K A 2017 Ultrason. Sonochem.34 651 [31] Moholkar V S, Sable S P and Pandit A B 2000 AIChE J.46 684 [32] Wu P, Wang X, Lin W and Bai L 2022 Ultrason. Sonochem.82 105878 [33] Saalbach K A, Twiefel J and Wallaschek J 2019 Ultrasonics94 401 [34] Mettin R, Akhatov I, Parlitz U, Ohl C D and Lauterborn W 1997 Phys. Rev. E56 2924 [35] Zhang L, Chen W, Shen Y, Wu Y and Zhao G 2021 Chaos, Solitons and Fractals152 111322 [36] Hatanaka S I, Yasui K, Kozuka T, Tuziuti T and Mitome H 2002 Ultrasonics40 655 [37] Chen H, Chen Z and Li Y 2020 Ultrason. Sonochem.61 104814
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
