CONDENSED MATTER: STRUCTURAL, MECHANICAL, AND THERMAL PROPERTIES |
Prev
Next
|
|
|
Nonvanishing optimal noise in cellular automaton model of self-propelled particles |
Guang-Le Du(杜光乐)1 and Fang-Fu Ye(叶方富)1,2,† |
1 Beijing National Laboratory for Condensed Matter Physics, Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China; 2 School of Physical Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China |
|
|
Abstract A minimal cellular automaton model is introduced to describe the collective motion of self-propelled particles on two-dimensional square lattice. The model features discretization of directional and positional spaces and single-particle occupation on one lattice site. Contrary to the Vicsek model and its variants, our model exhibits the nonvanishing optimal noise. When the particle density increases, the collective motion is promoted with optimal noise strength and reduced with noise strength out of optimal region. In addition, when the square lattice undergoes edge percolation process, no abrupt change of alignment behaviors is observed at the critical point of percolation.
|
Received: 26 March 2022
Accepted manuscript online: 18 April 2022
|
PACS:
|
64.60.Cn
|
(Order-disorder transformations)
|
|
64.60.De
|
(Statistical mechanics of model systems (Ising model, Potts model, field-theory models, Monte Carlo techniques, etc.))
|
|
64.60.aq
|
(Networks)
|
|
Fund: Project supported by the Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant No. XDB33000000) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 12090054). |
Corresponding Authors:
Fang-Fu Ye
E-mail: fye@iphy.ac.cn
|
Cite this article:
Guang-Le Du(杜光乐) and Fang-Fu Ye(叶方富) Nonvanishing optimal noise in cellular automaton model of self-propelled particles 2022 Chin. Phys. B 31 086401
|
[1] Helbing D, Farkas I and Vicsek T 2000 Nature 407 487 [2] Cavagna A, Cimarelli A, Giardina I, Parisi G, San-tagati R, Stefanini F and Viale M 2010 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107 11865 [3] Bhattacharya K and Vicsek T 2010 New J. Phys. 12 093019 [4] Zhang H P, Béer A, Florin E L and Swinney H L 2010 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107 13626 [5] Dombrowski C, Cisneros L, Chatkaew S, Goldstein R E and Kessler J O 2004 Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 098103 [6] Riedel I H, Kruse K and Howard J 2005 Science 309 300 [7] Takagi D, Palacci J, Braunschweig A B, Shelley M J and J Zhang 2014 Soft Matter 10 1784 [8] Vicsek T, Czirók A, Ben-Jacob E, Cohen I and Shochet O 1995 Phys. Rev. Lett. 75 1226 [9] Grégoire G and Chaté H 2004 Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 025702 [10] Chaté H, Ginelli F and Montagne R 2006 Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 180602 [11] Narayan V, Ramaswamy S and Menon N 2007 Science 317 105 [12] Grégoire G, Chaté H and Tu Y 2003 Phys. D 181 157 [13] Cates M E, Wittmer J P, Bouchaud J P and Claudinet P 1998 Phys. Rev. Lett. 81 1841 [14] Quint D A and Gopinathan A 2015 Phys. Biol. 12 046008 [15] Morin A, Desreumaux N, Caussin J B and Bartolo D 2016 Nat. Phys. 13 63 [16] Peruani F, Klauss T, Deutsch A and Voss-Boehme A 2011 Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 128101 [17] Csahok Z and T Vicsek 1994 J. Phys. Math. Gen. 27 L591 [18] Li W 2015 Sci. Rep. 5 13603 [19] Bussemaker H J, Deutsch A and Geigant E 1997 Phys. Rev. Lett. 78 5018 [20] Csahók Z and Vicsek T 1995 Phys. Rev. E 52 5297 [21] Chaté H, Ginelli F, Grégoire G and Raynaud F 2008 Phys. Rev. E 77 046113 [22] Chepizhko O, Altmann E G and Peruani F 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 238101 [23] Bonilla L L and Trenado C 2019 Phys. Rev. E 99 012612 [24] Boccaletti S, Bianconi G, Criado R, del Genio C I, Gómez-Gardeñes J, Romance M, Sendiña-Nadal I, Wang Z and Zanin M 2014 Phys. Rep. 544 1 [25] Nagel K and Schreckenberg M 1992 J. Phys. I France 2 2221 [26] Li Z, Liu F and Sun J 2011 Chin. Phys. B 20 088901 [27] Lefauve A and Saintillan D 2014 Phys. Rev. E 89 021002 |
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|