|
|
Analyzing floor-stair merging flow based on experiments and simulation |
Yu Zhu(朱萸)1,2, Tao Chen(陈涛)1,2, Ning Ding(丁宁)3,4, Wei-Cheng Fan(范维澄)1,2 |
1 Institute of Public Safety Research, Department of Engineering Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China; 2 Beijing Key Laboratory of City Integrated Emergency Response Science, Beijing 100084, China; 3 School of Criminal Investigation and Counter-Terrorism, People's Public Security University of China, Beijing 100038, China; 4 Public Security Behavioral Science Laboratory, People's Public Security University of China, Beijing 100038, China |
|
|
Abstract In most situations, staircase is the only egress to evacuate from high-rise buildings. The merging flow on the stair landing has a great influence on the evacuation efficiency. In this paper, we develop an improved cellular automaton model to describe the merging behavior, and the model is validated by a series of real experiments. It is found that the flow rate of simulation results is similar to the drills, which means that the improved model is reasonable and can be used to describe the merging behavior on stairs. Furthermore, some scenarios with different door locations and building floor numbers are simulated by the model. The results show that (i) the best door location is next to the upward staircase; (ii) the total evacuation time and the building floor number are linearly related to each other; (iii) the pedestrians on upper floors have a negative influence on the evacuation flow rate.
|
Received: 08 July 2019
Revised: 02 October 2019
Accepted manuscript online:
|
PACS:
|
04.25.dc
|
(Numerical studies of critical behavior, singularities, and cosmic censorship)
|
|
95.75.-z
|
(Observation and data reduction techniques; computer modeling and simulation)
|
|
47.11.-j
|
(Computational methods in fluid dynamics)
|
|
89.60.-k
|
(Environmental studies)
|
|
Fund: Project supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant Nos. 2017YFC0803300 and 2017YFC0820400) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 71673163). |
Corresponding Authors:
Ning Ding
E-mail: dingning_thu@126.com
|
Cite this article:
Yu Zhu(朱萸), Tao Chen(陈涛), Ning Ding(丁宁), Wei-Cheng Fan(范维澄) Analyzing floor-stair merging flow based on experiments and simulation 2020 Chin. Phys. B 29 010401
|
[1] |
Ronchi E and Nilsson D 2013 Fire Sci. Rev. 2 7
|
[2] |
Craesmeyer M and Schadschneider A 2014 Transp. Res. Procedia 2 406
|
[3] |
Cuesta A, Abreu O, Balboa A and Alvear D 2017 Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 70 155
|
[4] |
Aghabayk K, Ejtemai O, Sarvi M and Sobhani A 2014 Transp. Res. Procedia 2 768
|
[5] |
Shi X, Ye Z, Shiwakoti N, Tang D, Wang C and Wang W 2016 Accid. Anal. Prev. 95 405
|
[6] |
Lian L, Mai X, Song W, Richard Y K K, Rui Y and Jin S 2017 Fire Saf. J. 91 918
|
[7] |
Chen M M, Wang J H, Zhi Y R and Gao L J 2018 Procedia Eng. 211 70
|
[8] |
Xu X and Song W 2009 Build. Environ. 44 1039
|
[9] |
Galea E R, Sharp G and Lawrence P J 2008 J. Fire Prot. Eng. 18 291
|
[10] |
Ding Y, Yang L and Rao P 2013 Procedia Eng. 62 463
|
[11] |
Boyce K E, Purser D A and Shields T J 2012 Fire Mater. 36 383
|
[12] |
Huo F, Song W, Lv W and Liew K M 2014 Simulation 90 501
|
[13] |
Huo F, Song W, Chen L, Liu C and Liew K M 2016 Saf. Sci. 86 165
|
[14] |
Sano T, Ronchi E, Minegishi Y and Nilsson D 2017 Fire Saf. J. 89 77
|
[15] |
Yang L Z, Zhao D L, Li J and Fang T Y 2005 Build. Environ. 40 411
|
[16] |
Weng W G, Chen T, Yuan H Y and Fan W C 2006 Phys. Rev. E 74 036102
|
[17] |
Qiu G, Song R, He S and Yin W 2018 Phys. A: Stat. Mech. Its Appl. 508 199
|
[18] |
Shi M, Lee E W M and Ma Y 2018 Phys. A: Stat. Mech. Its Appl. 497 198
|
[19] |
Zhao D L, Li J, Zhu Y and Zou L 2008 Build. Environ. 43 518
|
[20] |
Zheng X P, Zhong T K and Liu M T 2009 Build. Environ. 44 437
|
[21] |
Yue F R, Chen J, Ma J, Song W G and Lo S M 2018 Chin. Phys. B 27 124501
|
[22] |
Chen Y Z, Li M, Jiang R and Hu M B 2018 Chin. Phys. B 27 088901
|
[23] |
Chen R, Li X and Dong L Y 2013 Physica A 392 2847
|
[24] |
Feng S M, Ding N, Chen T and Zhang H 2013 Physica A 392 2847
|
[25] |
Xu Y, Huang H J and Yong G 2012 Chin. Phys. Lett. 29 080502
|
[26] |
Lin P, Ma J and Lo S 2016 Chin. Phys. B 25 034501
|
[27] |
Hu J and You L 2017 Building Simul. 10 407
|
[28] |
Sun Z, Jia B and Li X G 2012 Acta Phys. Sin. 61 100508 (in Chinese)
|
[29] |
Li W J and Nie L 2018 Chin. Phys. B 27 070204
|
[30] |
Dong L Y, Lan D K and Li X 2016 Chin. Phys. B 25 098901
|
[31] |
Ding N, Chen T and Zhang H 2017 Building Simul. 10 407
|
[32] |
Jin H and Guo R Y 2019 Acta Phys. Sin. 68 020501 (in Chinese)
|
[33] |
Ning D, Hui Z, Tao C and Luh P B 2015 Chin. Phys. B 24 068801
|
[34] |
Ding N, Chen T, Zhang H and Luh P B 2014 Traffic and Granular Flow'13 pp. 145-153
|
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|