|
|
Attosecond transient absorption spectroscopy: Comparative study based on three-level modeling |
Zeng-Qiang Yang(杨增强)1, Di-Fa Ye(叶地发)1, Li-Bin Fu(傅立斌)1,2,3 |
1 Institute of Applied Physics and Computational Mathematics, Beijing 100088, China; 2 CAPT, HEDPS, and IFSA Collaborative Innovation Center of MoE, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China; 3 Center for Fusion Energy Science and Technology, China Academy of Engineering Physics, Beijing 100088, China |
|
|
Abstract In the present paper, the time-resolved transient absorption spectroscopy of helium atoms is investigated based on the three-level modeling. The helium atoms are subjected to an extreme ultraviolet (XUV) attosecond pulse and a time-delayed infrared (IR) few-cycle laser field. The odd excited state are populated from the ground state by the XUV pulse due to the dipole selection rule, and probed by the time-delayed IR laser. The time-resolved transient absorption spectroscopy based on the different coupling mechanism demonstrate some different features, the photoabsorption spectrum based on three-level model with rotating wave approximation (RWA) cannot repeat the fast oscillation and the sideband structure which have been observed in the previous experimental investigation. The dressing effect of IR laser pulse on the ground state can contribute new interference structures in the photoabsorption spectrum.
|
Received: 14 June 2017
Revised: 11 October 2017
Accepted manuscript online:
|
PACS:
|
33.20.Xx
|
(Spectra induced by strong-field or attosecond laser irradiation)
|
|
32.30.Jc
|
(Visible and ultraviolet spectra)
|
|
32.80.Qk
|
(Coherent control of atomic interactions with photons)
|
|
32.80.Wr
|
(Other multiphoton processes)
|
|
Fund: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 11674034 and 11564033) and the Foundation of President of the China Academy of Engineering Physics (Grant No. 2014-1-029). |
Corresponding Authors:
Zeng-Qiang Yang, Zeng-Qiang Yang
E-mail: yangzq@ymail.com;lbfu@iapcm.ac.cn
|
Cite this article:
Zeng-Qiang Yang(杨增强), Di-Fa Ye(叶地发), Li-Bin Fu(傅立斌) Attosecond transient absorption spectroscopy: Comparative study based on three-level modeling 2018 Chin. Phys. B 27 013301
|
[1] |
Krausz F and Ivanov M Y 2009 Rev. Mod. Phys. 81 163
|
[2] |
Li F, Wei L and He Z C 2015 Chin. Phys. B 24 043301
|
[3] |
Yao T, Jiang W C, Wu P and Peng L Y 2016 Chin. Phys. B 25 073202
|
[4] |
Goulielmakis E, Loh Z H, Wirth A, Santra R, Rohringer N, Yakovlev V S, Zherebtsov S, Pfeifer T, Azzeer A M, Klinget M F, Leone S R and Krausz F 2010 Nature 466 739
|
[5] |
Wirth A, Hassan M T, Grgura I, Gagnon J, Moulet A, Luu T T, Pabst S, Santra R, Alahmed Z A and Azzeeret A M 2011 Science 334 195
|
[6] |
Drescher M, Hentschel M, Kienberger R, Uiberacker M, Yakovlev V, Scrinzi A, Westerwalbesloh T, Kleineberg U, Heinzmann U and Krausz F 2002 Nature 419 803
|
[7] |
Wang H, Chini M, Chen S, Zhang C H, He F, Cheng Y, Wu Y, Thumm U and Chang Z 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 143002
|
[8] |
Gilbertson S, Chini M, Feng X, Khan S, Wu Y and Chang Z 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 263003
|
[9] |
Chini M, Zhao B, Wang H, Cheng Y, Hu S X and Chang Z 2012 Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 073601
|
[10] |
Chen S M, Bell J, Beck A R, Mashiko H, Wu M, Pfeiffer A N, Gaarde M B, Neumark D M, Leone S R and Schafer K J 2012 Phys. Rev. A 86 063408
|
[11] |
Chen S, Wu M, Gaarde M B and Schafer K J 2012 Phys. Rev. A 87 033408
|
[12] |
Chini M, Wang X, Cheng Y, Wu Y, Zhao D, Telnov D A, Chu S and Chang Z 2013 Sci. Rep. 3 1105
|
[13] |
Pfeiffer A N and Leone S R 2012 Phys. Rev. A 85 053422
|
[14] |
Wu M, Chen S, Gaarde M and Schafer K 2013 Phys. Rev. A 88 043416
|
[15] |
Wang X W, Chini M, Cheng Y, Wu Y, Tong X M and Chang Z 2013 Phys. Rev. A 87 063413
|
[16] |
Ott C, Kaldun A, Raith P, Meyer K, Laux M, Evers J, Keitel C H, Greene C H and Pfeifer T 2013 Science 340 716
|
[17] |
Ott C, Kaldun A, Argenti L, Raith P, Meyer K, Laux M, Zhang Y Z, Blättermann A, Hagstotz S, Ding T, Heck R, Madroñ ero J, Martín F and Pfeifer T 2014 Nature 516 374
|
[18] |
Chu W C and Lin C D 2012 Phys. Rev. A 85 013409
|
[19] |
Argenti L, Ott C, Pfeifer T and Martín F 2012 arXiv:1211.2566
|
[20] |
Yang Z Q, Ye D F, Ding T, Pfeifer T and Fu L B 2015 Phys. Rev. A 91 013414
|
[21] |
Yang Z Q and Zhang L D 2015 Acta Phys. Sin. 64 133203 (in Chinese)
|
[22] |
Chu W C, Zhao S F and Lin C D 2011 Phys. Rev. A 84 033426
|
[23] |
Fano U 1961 Phys. Rev. 124 1866
|
[24] |
Tong X M and Chu S I 1997 Chem. Phys. 217 119
|
[25] |
Cai X, Zhao J, Wang Z and Lin Q 2013 J. Phys. B 46 175602
|
[26] |
Gaarde M B, Buth C, Tate J L and Schafer K J 2011 Phys. Rev. A 83 013419
|
[27] |
Santra R, Yakovlev V S, Pfeifer T and Loh Z H 2011 Phys. Rev. A 83 033405
|
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|