| INTERDISCIPLINARY PHYSICS AND RELATED AREAS OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY |
Prev
Next
|
|
|
Effect of autaptic delay signal on spike-timing precision of single neuron |
| Xuan Ma(马璇)1, Yaya Zhao(赵鸭鸭)1, Yafeng Wang(王亚峰)2, Yueling Chen(陈月玲)3, and Hengtong Wang(王恒通)1,† |
1 School of Physics and Information Technology, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an 710119, China;
2 School of Physics and Information Technology, Baoji University, Baoji 710062, China;
3 College of Information Engineering, Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou 730000, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Experimental and theoretical studies have reported that the precise firing of neurons is crucial for sensory representation. Autapse serves as a special synapse connecting neuron and itself, which has also been found to improve the accuracy of neuronal response. In current work, the effect of autaptic delay signal on the spike-timing precision is investigated on a single autaptic Hodgkin-Huxley neuron in the present of noise. The simulation results show that both excitatory and inhibitory autaptic signals can effectively adjust the precise spike time of neurons with noise by choosing the appropriate coupling strength g and time delay of autaptic signal τ. The g-τ parameter space is divided into two regions: one is the region where the spike-timing precision is effectively regulated; the other is the region where the neuronal firing is almost not regulated. For the excitatory and inhibitory autapse, the range of parameters causing the accuracy of neuronal firing is different. Moreover, it is also found that the mechanisms of the spike-timing precision regulation are different for the two kinds of autaptic signals.
|
Received: 19 March 2022
Revised: 11 May 2022
Accepted manuscript online: 29 May 2022
|
|
PACS:
|
87.19.lg
|
(Synapses: chemical and electrical (gap junctions))
|
| |
87.19.ll
|
(Models of single neurons and networks)
|
|
| Fund: Project supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, China (Grant No. GK201903020), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 12005006), and Scientific research project of Education Department of Gansu Province, China (Grant No. 2016A-049). |
Corresponding Authors:
Hengtong Wang
E-mail: wanghengtong@snnu.edu.cn
|
Cite this article:
Xuan Ma(马璇), Yaya Zhao(赵鸭鸭), Yafeng Wang(王亚峰), Yueling Chen(陈月玲), and Hengtong Wang(王恒通) Effect of autaptic delay signal on spike-timing precision of single neuron 2023 Chin. Phys. B 32 038703
|
[1] Gardner B and Grüning A 2016 PloS One 11 e0161335
[2] Gaudry Q, Hong E J, Kain J, de Bivort B L, Wilson R I, de Bivort B L and Wilson R I 2013 Nature 493 424
[3] Buzsáki G and Wang X J 2012 Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 35 203
[4] James L E, Jean-Christophe L M, Glenn F, Zachary W and Monica Z W 2000 Proc. SPIE 4126 407519
[5] Mainen Z and Sejnowski T 1995 Science 268 1503
[6] Dayan P and Abbott L F 2001 Theoretical Neuroscience (Cambridge: The MIT Press)
[7] Butts D, Weng C, Jin J, Yeh C, Lesica1 N, Alonso J and Stanley G 2007 Nature 449 92
[8] Buracas G T, Zador A M, DeWeese M R and Albright T D 1998 Neuron 20 959
[9] Masuda N and Aihara K 2003 Neural Comput. 15 1341
[10] Tzounopoulos T and Kraus N 2009 Neuron 62 463
[11] VanRullen R, Guyonneau R and Thorpe S J 2005 Trends Neurosci. 28 1
[12] Grothe B and Klump G M 2000 Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 10 467
[13] Borst A and Theunissen F E 1999 Nat. Neurosci. 2 14731
[14] Fricker D and Miles R 2001 Neuron 32 771
[15] Kilinc D and Demir A 2018 J. Comput. Neurosci. 44 341
[16] Srivastava K H, Holmes C M, Vellema M, Pack A R, Elemans C P, Nemenman I and Sober S J 2017 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 114 1171
[17] Hasse J M and Briggs F 2017 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 114 E6222
[18] Yao Y, Su C and Xiong J 2019 Physica A 531 121734
[19] Verschueren E, Vanthornhout J and Francart T 2020 Hear. Res. 403 108175
[20] Vogels T P, Froemke R C, Doyon N, Gilson M, Haas J S, Liu R, Maffei A, Miller P, Wierenga C J and Woodin M A 2013 Front. Neural Circuits 7 119
[21] Garrido J A, Eduardo R and Egidio D 2013 Front. Comput. Neurosc. 7 159
[22] Maisel B and Lindenberg K 2017 Phys. Rev. E 95 022414
[23] Park S and Kwag J 2012 Neurosci. Lett. 523 9
[24] Zhao Z, Li L and Gu H 2018 Front. Cell. Neurosci. 12 00062
[25] Bacci A, Huguenard J R and Prince D A 2003 J. Neurosci. 23 859
[26] Klausberger T, Magill P J, Marton L F, Roberts J D, Cobden P M, Buzsaki G and Somogyi P 2003 Nature 421 844
[27] Hájos N, Pacutealhalmi J, Mann E O, Nacuteemeth B, Paulsen O and Freund T F 2004 J. Neurosci. 24 9127
[28] Somogyi P and Klausberger T 2005 J. Physiol. 562 9
[29] Bacci A and Huguenard J R 2006 Neuron 119 2006
[30] Wang H and Chen Y 2015 Chin. Phys. B 24 128709
[31] He Z, Yao C, Shuai J and Nakano T 2020 Chin. Phys. B 29 128702
[32] Yue Y, Liu L, Liu Y, Chen Y, Chen Y and Yu L 2017 Nonlinear Dyn. 90 2893
[33] Zhang N, Li D and Xing Y 2021 Eur. Phys. J. B 94 1
[34] He Z, Yao C, Shuai J and Nakano T 2020 Chin. Phys. B 29 128702
[35] Chagnaud B P, Perelmuter J T, Forlano P M and Bass A H 2021 Elife 10 e59390
[36] Xu Y and Ma J 2021 Chin. Phys. B 30 100501
[37] Dhamala M, Jirsa V K and Ding M 2004 Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 074104
[38] Wang Z, Parastesh F, Rajagopal K, Hamarash I I and Hussain I 2020 Chaos Solitons Fractals 134 109702
[39] Khan M A, Maity D and Jabeen S D 2019 Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 33 1950213
[40] Hodgkin A L and Huxley A F 1952 J. Physiol. 117 500
[41] Chen Y, Zhang H, Wang H T, Yu L and Chen Y 2013 PLoS One 8 e56822
[42] Ding X, Jia B, Li Y and Gu H 2021 Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 35 2150110
[43] Beiderbeck B, Myoga M H, Müller N I C, Callan A R, Friauf E, Grothe B and Pecka M 2018 Nat. Commun. 9 1771
[44] Kilinc D and Demir A 2018 J Comput Neurosci 44 341
[45] Gregory L P, Richard B L, Amanda M F and Ralph F F 2015 J. Neurophysiol. 113 1862
[46] Sejnowski T J and Paulsen D 2006 J. Neurosci. 26 1673
[47] Moldakarimov S, Bazhenov M and Sejnowski T J 2015 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 112 2545 |
| No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|
