Please wait a minute...
Chin. Phys. B, 2015, Vol. 24(11): 110307    DOI: 10.1088/1674-1056/24/11/110307
GENERAL Prev   Next  

Passive decoy-state quantum key distribution using weak coherent pulses with modulator attenuation

Li Yuan (李源)a b, Bao Wan-Su (鲍皖苏)a b, Li Hong-Wei (李宏伟)b, Zhou Chun (周淳)a b, Wang Yang (汪洋)a b
a Zhengzhou Information Science and Technology Institute, Zhengzhou 450004, China;
b Synergetic Innovation Center of Quantum Information and Quantum Physics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China
Abstract  Passive decoy-state quantum key distribution is more desirable than the active one in some scenarios. It is also affected by the imperfections of the devices. In this paper, the influence of modulator attenuation on the passive decoy-state method is considered. We introduce and analyze the unbalanced Mach-Zehnder interferometer, briefly, and combining with the virtual source and imaginary unitary transformation, we characterize the passive decoy-state method using a weak coherent photon source with modulator attenuation. According to the attenuation parameter δ, the pass efficiencies are given. Then, the key generation rate can be acquired. From numerical simulations, it can be seen that modulator attenuation has a non-negligible influence on the performance of passive-state QKD protocol. Based on the research, the analysis method of virtual source and imaginary unitary transformation are preferred in analyzing passive decoy state protocol, and the passive decoy-state method is better than the active one and is close to the active vacuum + weak decoy state under the condition of having the same modulator attenuation.
Keywords:  quantum key distribution      passive decoy state      modulator attenuation      weak coherent pulses  
Received:  17 March 2015      Revised:  07 August 2015      Accepted manuscript online: 
PACS:  03.67.Dd (Quantum cryptography and communication security)  
  03.67.Hk (Quantum communication)  
Fund: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11304397).
Corresponding Authors:  Bao Wan-Su     E-mail:  2010thzz@sina.com

Cite this article: 

Li Yuan (李源), Bao Wan-Su (鲍皖苏), Li Hong-Wei (李宏伟), Zhou Chun (周淳), Wang Yang (汪洋) Passive decoy-state quantum key distribution using weak coherent pulses with modulator attenuation 2015 Chin. Phys. B 24 110307

[1] Bennett C H and Brassard G 1984 IEEE Int. Conf. on Computers, Systems, and Signal Processing (New York: IEEE) pp. 175-179
[2] Ekert A K;1991 Phys. Rev. Lett. 67 661
[3] Nielsen M A and Chuang I L 2000 Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) Chaps. 2 and 12
[4] Lo H K and Chau H F 1990 Science 283 2050
[5] Shor P and Preskill J;2000 Phys. Rev. Lett. 85 441
[6] Gottesman D, Lo H K, Lütkenhaus N and Preskill J 2004 Quantum Inf. Comput. 4 325
[7] Wang S, Chen W, Guo J F and Yin Z Q;2012 Opt. Lett. 37 1008
[8] Jouguet P, Kunz-Jacques S, Leverrier A, Grangier P and Diamanti E;2013 Nat. Photonics 7 378
[9] Wang J Y;2013 Nat. Photonics 7 387
[10] Zhao L Y, Li H W, Yin Z Q, Chen W, You J and Han Z F;2014 Chin. Phys. B 23 100304
[11] Li M, Treeviriyanupab P, Zhang C M, Yin Z Q, Chen W and Han Z F;2015 Chin. Phys. B 24 010302
[12] Lo H K and Chau H F 1999 Science 283 5410
[13] Renner R 2005 Security of Quantum Key Distribution (PhD thesis) quant-ph/0512258
[14] Horodecki K, Horodecki M, Horodecki P, Leung D and Oppenheim J;2008 IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 54 2604
[15] Scarani V, Bechmann-Pasquinucci H, Cerf N J, Dusek M, Lütkenhaus N and Peev M;2009 Rev. Mod. Phys. 81 1301
[16] Hwang W Y;2003 Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 057901
[17] Lo H K, Ma X and Chen K;2005 Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 230504
[18] Wang X B;2005 Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 230503
[19] Wang X B;2005 Phys. Rev. A 72 012322
[20] Ma X, Qi B, Zhao Y and Lo H K;2005 Phys. Rev. A 72 012326
[21] Acin A, Brunner N, Gisin N, Massar S, Pironio S and Scarani V;2007 Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 230501
[22] Gisin N, Pironio S and Sangouard N;2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 070501
[23] Pawlowski M and Brunner N;2011 Phys. Rev. A 84 010302
[24] Braunstein S L and Pirandola S;2012 Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 130502
[25] Lo H K, Curty M and Qi B;2012 Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 130503
[26] Tamaki K, Lo H K, Fung C H F and Qi B;2012 Phys. Rev. A 85 042307
[27] Ma X F and Razavi M;2012 Phys. Rev. A 86 062319
[28] Zhou C, Bao W S, Chen W, Li H W, Yin Z Q, Wang Y and Han Z F;2013 Phys. Rev. A 88 052333
[29] Li F Y, Yin Z Q, Li H W, Chen W, Wang S, Wen H, Zhao Y B and Han Z F;2014 Chin. Phys. Lett. 31 070302
[30] Dong C, Zhao S H, Zhang N, Dong Y, Zhao W H and Liu Y;2014 Acta Phys. Sin. 63 200304 (in Chinese)
[31] Dong C, Zhao S H, Dong Y, Zhao W H and Zhao J 2014 Acta Phys.Sin. 63 170303 (in Chinese)
[32] Mauerer W and Silberhorn C 2007 Phys. Rev. A 75 050305(R)
[33] Adachi Y, Yamamoto T, Koashi M and Imoto N;2007 Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 180503
[34] Bennett C H;1992 Phys. Rev. Lett. 68 3121
[35] Mo X F, Zhu B, Han Z F, Gui Y Z and Guo G C;2005 Opt. Lett. 30 2632
[36] Han Z F, Mo X F, Gui Y Z and Guo G C;2005 Appl. Phys. Lett. 86 221103
[37] Li H W, Yin Z Q, Han Z F, Bao W S and Guo G C 2010 Quantum Inf. Comput. 10 0771
[38] Ferenczi A, Narasimhachar V and Lütkenhaus N;2012 Phys. Rev. A 86 042327
[39] Bennett C H, Bessette F, Brassard G, Salvail L and Smolin J A 1992 J. Cryptol. 5 3
[40] Huttner B, Imoto N, Gisin N and Mor T;1995 Phys. Rev. A 51 1863
[41] Brassard G, Lütkenhaus N, Mor T and Sanders B C;2000 Phys. Rev. Lett. 85 1330
[42] Curty M, Morder T, Ma X and Lutkenhaus N;2009 Opt. Lett. 34 3238
[43] Brassard G and Salvail L 1993 Proceedings of Advances in Cryptology-EUROCRYPT’93, Lofthus, Norway, m 1993, Lecture Notes in Computer Science (New York: Springer) p. 410
[44] Ma X and Lo H K;2008 New J. Phys. 10 073018
[45] Curty M, Ma X, Qi B and Moroder T;2010 Phys. Rev. A 81 022310
[46] Arfken G 1985 Mathematical Mehthods for Physicists (3rd edn.) (New York: Academic)
[47] Gobby C, Yuan Z L and Shields A J;2004 Appl. Phys. Lett. 84 3762
[1] Security of the traditional quantum key distribution protocolswith finite-key lengths
Bao Feng(冯宝), Hai-Dong Huang(黄海东), Yu-Xiang Bian(卞宇翔), Wei Jia(贾玮), Xing-Yu Zhou(周星宇), and Qin Wang(王琴). Chin. Phys. B, 2023, 32(3): 030307.
[2] Performance of phase-matching quantum key distribution based on wavelength division multiplexing technology
Haiqiang Ma(马海强), Yanxin Han(韩雁鑫), Tianqi Dou(窦天琦), and Pengyun Li(李鹏云). Chin. Phys. B, 2023, 32(2): 020304.
[3] Temperature characterizations of silica asymmetric Mach-Zehnder interferometer chip for quantum key distribution
Dan Wu(吴丹), Xiao Li(李骁), Liang-Liang Wang(王亮亮), Jia-Shun Zhang(张家顺), Wei Chen(陈巍), Yue Wang(王玥), Hong-Jie Wang(王红杰), Jian-Guang Li(李建光), Xiao-Jie Yin(尹小杰), Yuan-Da Wu(吴远大), Jun-Ming An(安俊明), and Ze-Guo Song(宋泽国). Chin. Phys. B, 2023, 32(1): 010305.
[4] Improvement of a continuous-variable measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution system via quantum scissors
Lingzhi Kong(孔令志), Weiqi Liu(刘维琪), Fan Jing(荆凡), Zhe-Kun Zhang(张哲坤), Jin Qi(齐锦), and Chen He(贺晨). Chin. Phys. B, 2022, 31(9): 090304.
[5] Practical security analysis of continuous-variable quantum key distribution with an unbalanced heterodyne detector
Lingzhi Kong(孔令志), Weiqi Liu(刘维琪), Fan Jing(荆凡), and Chen He(贺晨). Chin. Phys. B, 2022, 31(7): 070303.
[6] Short-wave infrared continuous-variable quantum key distribution over satellite-to-submarine channels
Qingquan Peng(彭清泉), Qin Liao(廖骎), Hai Zhong(钟海), Junkai Hu(胡峻凯), and Ying Guo(郭迎). Chin. Phys. B, 2022, 31(6): 060306.
[7] Quantum key distribution transmitter chip based on hybrid-integration of silica and lithium niobates
Xiao Li(李骁), Liang-Liang Wang(王亮亮), Jia-shun Zhang(张家顺), Wei Chen(陈巍), Yue Wang(王玥), Dan Wu (吴丹), and Jun-Ming An (安俊明). Chin. Phys. B, 2022, 31(6): 064212.
[8] Phase-matching quantum key distribution with light source monitoring
Wen-Ting Li(李文婷), Le Wang(王乐), Wei Li(李威), and Sheng-Mei Zhao(赵生妹). Chin. Phys. B, 2022, 31(5): 050310.
[9] Parameter estimation of continuous variable quantum key distribution system via artificial neural networks
Hao Luo(罗浩), Yi-Jun Wang(王一军), Wei Ye(叶炜), Hai Zhong(钟海), Yi-Yu Mao(毛宜钰), and Ying Guo(郭迎). Chin. Phys. B, 2022, 31(2): 020306.
[10] Detecting the possibility of a type of photon number splitting attack in decoy-state quantum key distribution
Xiao-Ming Chen(陈小明), Lei Chen(陈雷), and Ya-Long Yan(阎亚龙). Chin. Phys. B, 2022, 31(12): 120304.
[11] Realization of simultaneous balanced multi-outputs for multi-protocols QKD decoding based onsilica-based planar lightwave circuit
Jin You(游金), Yue Wang(王玥), and Jun-Ming An(安俊明). Chin. Phys. B, 2021, 30(8): 080302.
[12] Continuous-variable quantum key distribution based on photon addition operation
Xiao-Ting Chen(陈小婷), Lu-Ping Zhang(张露萍), Shou-Kang Chang(常守康), Huan Zhang(张欢), and Li-Yun Hu(胡利云). Chin. Phys. B, 2021, 30(6): 060304.
[13] Practical decoy-state BB84 quantum key distribution with quantum memory
Xian-Ke Li(李咸柯), Xiao-Qian Song(宋小谦), Qi-Wei Guo(郭其伟), Xing-Yu Zhou(周星宇), and Qin Wang(王琴). Chin. Phys. B, 2021, 30(6): 060305.
[14] Three-party reference frame independent quantum key distribution protocol
Comfort Sekga and Mhlambululi Mafu. Chin. Phys. B, 2021, 30(12): 120301.
[15] Reference-frame-independent quantum key distribution of wavelength division multiplexing with multiple quantum channels
Zhongqi Sun(孙钟齐), Yanxin Han(韩雁鑫), Tianqi Dou(窦天琦), Jipeng Wang(王吉鹏), Zhenhua Li(李振华), Fen Zhou(周芬), Yuqing Huang(黄雨晴), and Haiqiang Ma(马海强). Chin. Phys. B, 2021, 30(11): 110303.
No Suggested Reading articles found!