CONDENSED MATTER: STRUCTURAL, MECHANICAL, AND THERMAL PROPERTIES |
Prev
Next
|
|
|
Analytical results for the cluster size distribution in controlled deposition processes |
Ke Jian-Hong(柯见洪)a)b)†, Chen Xiao-Shuang(陈效双)a), and Lin Zhen-Quan(林振权)b) |
a National Laboratory of Infrared Physics, Shanghai Institute of Technical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200083, China; b College of Physics and Electronic Information Engineering, Wenzhou University, Wenzhou 325035, China |
|
|
Abstract This paper proposes a controlled particle deposition model for cluster growth on the substrate surface and then presents exact results for the cluster (island) size distribution. In the system, at every time step a fixed number of particles are injected into the system and immediately deposited onto the substrate surface. It investigates the cluster size distribution by employing the generalized rate equation approach. The results exhibit that the evolution behaviour of the system depends crucially on the details of the adsorption rate kernel. The cluster size distribution can take the Poisson distribution or the conventional scaling form in some cases, while it is of a quite complex form in other cases.
|
Received: 13 March 2009
Revised: 08 April 2009
Accepted manuscript online:
|
PACS:
|
81.15.-z
|
(Methods of deposition of films and coatings; film growth and epitaxy)
|
|
68.55.A-
|
(Nucleation and growth)
|
|
68.43.Mn
|
(Adsorption kinetics ?)
|
|
Fund: Project supported by the National
Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 10775104, 10875086
and 10305009). |
Cite this article:
Ke Jian-Hong(柯见洪), Chen Xiao-Shuang(陈效双), and Lin Zhen-Quan(林振权) Analytical results for the cluster size distribution in controlled deposition processes 2010 Chin. Phys. B 19 026802
|
[1] |
Friedlander S K 1977 Smoke, Dust and Haze: Fundamentals of AerosolBehavior (New York: Wiley)
|
[2] |
Silk J 1980 Star Formation (Sauverny: Geneva Observatory)
|
[3] |
Family F and Landau D P 1984 Kinetics of Aggregation and Gelation (Amsterdam: North-Holland)
|
[4] |
Meakin P 1992 Rep. Prog. Phys. 55 157
|
[5] |
Pimpinelli A and Villain J 1998 Physics of Crystal Growth (Cambridge: Cambridge UniversityPress)
|
[6] |
Meakin P 1983 Phys. Rev. Lett. 51 1119
|
[7] |
Kolb M, Botet R and Jullien R 1983 Phys. Rev. Lett. 51 1123
|
[8] |
Vicsek T and Family F 1984 Phys. Rev. Lett. 521669
|
[9] |
van Dongen P G J and Ernst M H 1985 Phys. Rev.Lett. 541396
|
[10] |
Doering C R and Ben-Avraham D 1989 Phys. Rev. Lett. 622563
|
[11] |
Song S and Poland D 1992 Phys. Rev. A 46 5063
|
[12] |
Krapivsky P L and Redner S 1996 Phys. Rev. E 543553
|
[13] |
Ke J and Lin Z 2002 Phys. Rev. E 65 051107
|
[14] |
Ispolatov S, Krapivsky P L and Redner S 1998 Eur. Phys. J. B 2267
|
[15] |
Leyvraz F and Redner S 2002 Phys. Rev. Lett. 88068301
|
[16] |
Ke J and Lin Z 2002 Phys. Rev. E 66 062101
|
[17] |
Ke J and Lin Z 2004 J. Phys. A 37 3967
|
[18] |
Hinrichsen E L, Feder J and J?ssang T 1986 J. Stat. Phys. 44 793
|
[19] |
Schaaf P and Talbot J 1989 Phys. Rev. Lett. 62 175
|
[20] |
Evans J W 1993 Rev. Mod. Phys. 65 1281
|
[21] |
Filipe J A N and Rodgers G J 1995 Phys. Rev. E 52 6044
|
[22] |
Ben-Naim E and Krapivsky P L 1996 Phys. Rev. E 543562
|
[23] |
Hassan M K, Schmidt J, Blasius B and Kurths J 2002 Phys. Rev. E 65 045103
|
[24] |
Robbie K and Brett M J 1997 J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 15 1460
|
[25] |
Zhao Y P, Ye D X, Wang G C and Lu T M 2002 Nano Lett. 2 351
|
[26] |
Wang P I, Zhao Y P, Wang G C and Lu T M 2004 Nanotechnology 15 218
|
[27] |
Peng X and Chen A 2005 Appl. Phys. A 80 473
|
[28] |
Steele J J and Brett M J 2007 J Mater. Sci: Mater.Electron. 18 367
|
[29] |
Wang H H, Shi Y J, William C and Yigal B 2008 Chin. Phys.Lett. 25 234
|
[30] |
Chen Y S, Yang S E, Wang J H, Lu J X, Gao X Y, Gu J H, Zheng W andZhao S L 2008 Chin. Phys. B 17 1394
|
[31] |
Chen Y S, Wang J H, Lu J X, Zheng W, Gu J H, Yang S E, Gao X Y, Guo X J, Zhao S L and Gao Z 2008 Chin. Phys. B 17 3464
|
[32] |
Han D L, Zhao Y L, Zhao H B, Song T F and Liang E J 2007 Acta Phys. Sin. 56 5958 (inChinese)
|
[33] |
Tang F, Liu D L, Ye D X, Zhao Y P, Lu T M, Wang G C and Vijayaraghavan A2003 J. Appl. Phys. 9 3 4194
|
[34] |
Kayes B M, Atwater H A and Lewis N S 2005 J.Appl. Phys. 97 14302
|
[35] |
He Y P, Zhang Z Y and Zhao Y P 2008 J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 26 1350
|
[36] |
Karabacak T, Singh J P, Zhao Y P, Wang G C and Lu T M 2003 Phys. Rev. B 68 125408
|
[37] |
Enomoto Y and Taguchi M 2005 Appl. Surf. Sci. 244 213
|
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|