| ELECTROMAGNETISM, OPTICS, ACOUSTICS, HEAT TRANSFER, CLASSICAL MECHANICS, AND FLUID DYNAMICS |
Prev
Next
|
|
|
Robust autofocusing propagation in turbulence |
| Na-Na Liu(刘娜娜)1, Liu Tan(谭柳)1, Kai-Jian Chen(陈凯健)1, Pei-Long Hong(洪佩龙)2, Xiao-Ming Mo(莫小明)1, Bing-Suo Zou(邹炳锁)1, Yu-Xuan Ren(任煜轩)3, and Yi Liang(梁毅)1,† |
1 Guangxi Key Laboratory for Relativistic Astrophysics, Center on Nanoenergy Research, School of Physical Science and Technology, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China;
2 School of Mathematics and Physics, Anqing Normal University, Anqing 246133, China;
3 Institute for Translational Brain Research, MOE Frontiers Center for Brain Science, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Turbulence in complex environments such as the atmosphere and biological media has always been a great challenge to the application of beam propagation in optical communication, optical trapping and manipulation. To overcome this challenge, this study comprehensively investigates the robust propagation of traditional Gaussian and autofocusing beams in turbulent environments. In order to select stable beams that exhibit high intensity and high field gradient at the focal position in complex environments, Kolmogorov turbulence theory is used to simulate the propagation of beams in atmospheric turbulence based on the multi-phase screen method. We systematically analyze the intensity fluctuations, the variation of the coherence factor and the change in the scintillation index with propagation distance. The analysis reveals that the intensity fluctuations of autofocusing beams are significantly smaller than those of Gaussian beams, and the coherence of autofocusing beams is better than that of Gaussian beams under turbulence. Moreover, autofocusing beams exhibit less oscillation than Gaussian beams, indicating that autofocusing beams propagate in complex environments with less distortion and intensity fluctuation. Overall, this work clearly demonstrates that autofocusing beams exhibit higher stability in propagation compared with Gaussian beams, showing great promise for applications such as optical trapping and manipulation in complex environments.
|
Received: 22 December 2023
Revised: 05 February 2024
Accepted manuscript online: 22 February 2024
|
|
PACS:
|
42.25.Bs
|
(Wave propagation, transmission and absorption)
|
| |
42.25.Dd
|
(Wave propagation in random media)
|
| |
42.68.Ay
|
(Propagation, transmission, attenuation, and radiative transfer)
|
| |
42.25.Fx
|
(Diffraction and scattering)
|
|
| Fund: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11604058), Guangxi Natural Science Foundation (Grant Nos. 2020GXNSFAA297041 and 2023JJA110112), Innovation Project of Guangxi Graduate Education (Grant No. YCSW2023083), and Sichuan Science and Technology Program (Grant No. 2023NSFSC0460). |
Corresponding Authors:
Yi Liang
E-mail: liangyi@gxu.edu.cn
|
Cite this article:
Na-Na Liu(刘娜娜), Liu Tan(谭柳), Kai-Jian Chen(陈凯健), Pei-Long Hong(洪佩龙), Xiao-Ming Mo(莫小明), Bing-Suo Zou(邹炳锁), Yu-Xuan Ren(任煜轩), and Yi Liang(梁毅) Robust autofocusing propagation in turbulence 2024 Chin. Phys. B 33 064201
|
[1] Klug A, Peters C and Forbes A 2023 Adv. Photon. 5 016006
[2] Cox M, Mphuthi N, Nape I, Mashaba N, Cheng L and Forbes A 2021 IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 27 7500521
[3] Bunea A and Gluckstad J 2019 Laser & Photon. Rev. 13 1800227
[4] Ricklin J C and Davidson F M 2002 J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 19 1794
[5] Yang Y J, Ren Y X, Chen M Z, Arita Y and Rosales-Guzmán C 2021 Adv. Photon. 3 034001
[6] Wang Q Y, Fink M and Ma G C 2023 Phys. Rev. Appl. 19 034084
[7] Liu K G, Zhang H K, Du S S, Liu Z Q, Zhang B, Fu X and Liu Q 2022 Photon. Res. 10 2293
[8] Hong P L, Ojambati O S, Lagendijk A, Mosk A P and Vos W L 2018 Optica 5 844
[9] Cao H, Mosk A P and Rotter S 2022 Nat. Phys. 18 994
[10] Bertolotti J and Katz O 2022 Nat. Phys. 18 1008
[11] Efremidis N K and Christodoulides D N 2010 Opt. Lett. 35 4045
[12] Zhang P, Prakash J, Zhang Z, Mills M S, Efremidis N K, Christodoulides D N and Chen Z G 2011 Opt. Lett. 36 2883
[13] Otte E and Denz C 2020 Appl. Phys. Rev. 7 041308
[14] Liang Y, Tan L, Liu N N, Chen K J, Liang H P, Wu H H, Luo B S, Lu F X, Chen H H, Zou B S and Hong P L 2023 Phys. Rev. Appl. 19 014016
[15] Efremidis N K, Chen Z G, Segev M and Christodoulides D N 2019 Optica 6 686
[16] Lu F X, Wu H, Liang Y, Tan L, Tan Z F, Feng X, Hu Y, Xiang Y X, Hu X B, Chen Z G and Xu J J 2021 Phys. Rev. A 104 043524
[17] Moradi H, Jabbarpour M, Abdollahpour D and Hajizadeh F 2022 Opt. Lett. 47 4115
[18] Lu F X, Tan L, Tan Z F, Wu H H and Liang Y 2021 Phys. Rev. A 104 023526
[19] Broky J, Siviloglou G A, Dogariu A and Christodoulides D N 2008 Opt. Express 16 12880
[20] Liang Y, Hu Y, Song D H, Lou C B, Zhang X Z, Chen Z G and Xu J J 2015 Opt. Lett. 40 5686
[21] Ren Y X, Lamstein J, Zhang C S, Conti C, Christodoulides D N and Chen Z G 2023 Photon. Res. 11 1838
[22] Chen X Y, Deng D M, Zhuang J L, Peng X, Li D D, Zhang L P, Zhao F, Yang X B, Liu H Z and Wang G H 2018 Opt. Lett. 43 3626
[23] Ring J D, Lindberg J, Mourka A, Mazilu M, Dholakia K and Dennis M R 2012 Opt. Express 20 18955
[24] Singh S, Mishra S K and Mishra A K 2023 J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 40 2287
[25] Papazoglou D G, Efremidis N K, Christodoulides D N and Tzortzakis S 2011 Opt. Lett. 36 1842
[26] Wang F, Zhao C L, Dong Y, Dong Y M and Cai Y J 2014 Appl. Phys. B 117 905
[27] Jimenez J 2004 Arbor-Ciencia Pensamiento Y Cul. 178 589
[28] Schmidt J 2010 Numerical Simulation of Optical Wave Propagation With Examples in Matlab (Washington: Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers Press) p. 155
[29] Gu Y and Gbur G 2010 Opt. Lett. 35 3456
[30] Pan Y Q, Zhao M L, Zhang M M, Dou J T, Zhao J, Li B and Hu Y Y 2023 Opt. & Laser Technol. 159 109024
[31] Li C Q, Zhang H Y, Wang T F, Liu L S and Guo J 2013 Acta Phys. Sin. 62 224203 (in Chinese)
[32] Mabena C and Roux F 2019 Phys. Rev. A 99 013828
[33] Berman G P, Gorshkov V N and Torous S V 2011 J. Phys. B At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 44 055402
[34] Hu Y, Bongiovanni D, Chen Z G and Morandotti R 2013 Phys. Rev. A 88 043809
[35] Vaveliuk P, Martinez-Matos O, Ren Y X and Lu R D 2017 Phys. Rev. A 95 063838
[36] Berry M and Upstill C 1980 IV Catastrophe Optics: Morphologies of Caustics and Their Diffraction Patterns (Bristol: University of Bristol press) p. 268 |
| No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|
