CONDENSED MATTER: STRUCTURAL, MECHANICAL, AND THERMAL PROPERTIES |
Prev
Next
|
|
|
Effect of grain size on gas bubble evolution in nuclear fuel: Phase-field investigations |
Dan Sun(孙丹)1, Qingfeng Yang(杨青峰)1, Jiajun Zhao(赵家珺)2, Shixin Gao(高士鑫)1, Yong Xin(辛勇)1, Yi Zhou(周毅)1, Chunyu Yin(尹春雨)1, Ping Chen(陈平)1,†, Jijun Zhao(赵纪军)2, and Yuanyuan Wang(王园园)2,‡ |
1 Science and Technology on Reactor System Design Technology Laboratory, Nuclear Power Institute of China, Chengdu 610213, China; 2 Key Laboratory of Materials Modification by Laser, Ion, and Electron Beams, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China |
|
|
Abstract Numerous irradiation-induced gas bubbles are created in the nuclear fuel during irradiation, leading to the change of microstructure and the degradation of mechanical and thermal properties. The grain size of fuel is one of the important factors affecting bubble evolution. In current study, we first predict the thermodynamic behaviors of point defects as well as the interplay between vacancy and gas atom in both UO2 and U3Si2 according to ab initio approach. Then, we establish the irradiation-induced bubble phase-field model to investigate the formation and evolution of intra- and inter-granular gas bubbles. The effects of fission rate and temperature on the evolutions of bubble morphologies in UO2 and U3Si2 have been revealed. Especially, a comparison of porosities under different grain sizes is examined and analyzed. To understand the thermal conductivity as functions of grain size and porosity, the heat transfer capability of U3Si2 is evaluated.
|
Received: 03 August 2023
Revised: 28 September 2023
Accepted manuscript online: 02 November 2023
|
PACS:
|
61.72.Mm
|
(Grain and twin boundaries)
|
|
61.72.J-
|
(Point defects and defect clusters)
|
|
61.72.-y
|
(Defects and impurities in crystals; microstructure)
|
|
Fund: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. U2167217, 12205286, and 11905025) and the National MCF Energy Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2018YFE0308105). |
Corresponding Authors:
Ping Chen, Yuanyuan Wang
E-mail: Chenping_npic@163.com;yuanyuanwang@dlut.edu.cn
|
Cite this article:
Dan Sun(孙丹), Qingfeng Yang(杨青峰), Jiajun Zhao(赵家珺), Shixin Gao(高士鑫), Yong Xin(辛勇), Yi Zhou(周毅), Chunyu Yin(尹春雨), Ping Chen(陈平), Jijun Zhao(赵纪军), and Yuanyuan Wang(王园园) Effect of grain size on gas bubble evolution in nuclear fuel: Phase-field investigations 2024 Chin. Phys. B 33 016105
|
[1] Rebak R B 2020 Accident-tolerant materials for light water reactor fuels (Amsterdam:Elsevier) p. 45 [2] Gamble K A, Pastore G, Andersson D and Cooper M W 2019 ATF material model development and validation for priority fuel concepts (Idaho Falls:Idaho National Laboratory) p. 7 [3] Ortega L H, Blamer B J, Evans J A and McDeavitt S M 2016 J. Nucl. Mater. 471 116 [4] Harp J M, Lessing P A and Hoggan R E 2015 J. Nucl. Mater. 466 728 [5] Noirot J, Pontillon Y, Yagnik S and Turnbull J A 2015 J. Nucl. Mater. 46 277 [6] Massih A 2014 Effects of additives on uranium dioxide fuel behavior (Uppsala:Swedish Radiation Safety Authority) p. 1 [7] Delafoy C and Dewes P 2006 Top Fuel 2006 International Meeting on LWR Fuel Performance "Nuclear Fuel:Addressing the future", October 22-26, 2006, Salamance, Spain, pp. 142-146 [8] Cooper M W, Pastore G, Che Y, Matthews C, Forslund A, Stanek C R, Shirvan K, Tverberg T, Gamble K A, Mays B and Andersson D A 2021 J. Nucl. Mater. 545 152590 [9] Gan J, Keiser D D Jr, Miller B D, Jue J F, Robinson A B, Madden J W, Medvedev P G and Wachs D M 2011 J. Nucl. Mater. 419 97 [10] Barani T, Pastore G, Pizzocri D, Andersson D A, Matthews C, Alfonsi A, Gamble K A, Van Uffelen P, Luzzi L and Hales J D 2019 J. Nucl. Mater. 522 97 [11] Shimizu H 1965 The Properties and Irradiation Behavior of U3Si2 (Canoga Park:Atomics International) NAA-SR-10621 [12] Miao Y, Gamble K A, Andersson D, Mei Z G and Yacout A M 2018 Nucl. Eng. Des. 326 371 [13] Rest J 2003 J. Nucl. Mater. 325 107 [14] Andersson D A, Liu X Y, Beeler B, Middleburgh S C, Claisse A and Stanek C R 2019 J. Nucl. Mater. 515 312 [15] Yun Y, Kim H, Kim H and Park K 2008 J. Nucl. Mater. 378 40 [16] Kaloni T P and Torres E 2020 J. Nucl. Mater. 533 152090 [17] Millett P C, Tonks M R, Biner S B, Zhang L, Chockalingam K and Zhang Y 2012 J. Nucl. Mater. 425 130 [18] Aagesen L K, Schwen D, Tonks M R and Zhang Y 2019 Comput. Mater. Sci. 161 35 [19] Wang Y F, Z H Xiao and Shi S Q 1974 J. Eng. Phys. Thermophys. 21 1156 [41] Bauer T H 1993 Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 36 4181 [42] Millett P C and Tonks M 2011 J. Nucl. Mater. 412 281 [43] Hu S, Casella A M, Lavender C A, Senor D J and Burkes D E 2015 J. Nucl. Mater. 462 64 [44] Millett P C, Tonks M R, Chockalingam K, Zhang Y and Biner S B 2013 J. Nucl. Mater. 439 117 |
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|