|
|
The evolution of cooperation in public good game with deposit |
Xian-Jia Wang(王先甲)1,2, Wen-Man Chen(陈文嫚)1 |
1 Economics and Management School, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430070, China;
2 Institute of System and Engineer, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430070, China |
|
|
Abstract The emergence of cooperation still remains a fundamental conundrum in the social and behavior sciences. We introduce a new mechanism, deposit mechanism, into theoretical model to explore how this mechanism promotes cooperation in a well-mixed population. Firstly, we extend the common binary-strategy combination of cooperation and defection in public good game by adding a third strategy, namely, deposit cooperation. The players with deposit cooperation strategy pay a deposit in advance to obtain the benefits of public good at a lower contributions compared with the players with cooperation strategy, when the provision of public good is successful. Then, we explore the evolution of cooperation in the public good game with deposit by means of the replicator dynamics. Theoretical computations and stimulations show that the deposit mechanism can promote cooperation in a well-mixed population, and the numbers of equilibrium point are determined by variables of public good game. On the one hand, when the coexistence of cooperators and defectors is the stable equilibrium point in the evolutionary system, increasing the threshold of public good and adopting the weak altruism way for share benefits can enhance the level of cooperation in the population. On the other hand, if the coexistence of deposit cooperators and defectors is the stable equilibrium point, it is effective to promote the deposit cooperation by lowering the values of discount and deposit, and raising the threshold of public good.
|
Received: 05 May 2019
Revised: 06 June 2019
Accepted manuscript online:
|
PACS:
|
02.50.Le
|
(Decision theory and game theory)
|
|
05.45.Pq
|
(Numerical simulations of chaotic systems)
|
|
Fund: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 71871171, 71871173, and 71701076). |
Corresponding Authors:
Wen-Man Chen
E-mail: wenmanchen@whu.edu.cn
|
Cite this article:
Xian-Jia Wang(王先甲), Wen-Man Chen(陈文嫚) The evolution of cooperation in public good game with deposit 2019 Chin. Phys. B 28 080201
|
[40] |
Chen C Q, Dai Q L, Han W C and Yang J Z 2017 Chin. Phys. Lett. 34 028901
|
[1] |
Christie M R, Mcnickle G G, French R A and Michael S B 2018 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 115 4441
|
[41] |
Tao S Y, Cui M Z, Dai Q L and Yang J Z 2014 Chin. Phys. Lett. 31 110201
|
[2] |
Colman A M 2006 Nature 440 744
|
[42] |
Jianlei Z, Chunyan Z and Ming C 2015 Sci. Rep. 5 9098
|
[3] |
Martinezvaquero L A, Han T A, Pereira L M and Lenaerts T 2017 Sci. Rep. 7 2478
|
[43] |
Fletcher J A and Zwick M 2007 J. Theor. Biol. 245 26
|
[4] |
Axelrod R, Hamilton W D 1981 Science 211 1390
|
[44] |
Li Y and Ye H 2018 Appl. Math. Comput. 320 621
|
[5] |
Du P, Xu C and Zhang W 2015 Chin. Phys. Lett. 32 058901
|
[45] |
Shimura H and Nakamaru M 2018 J. Theor. Biol. 451 46
|
[6] |
Wei L Y, Cui Y F and Li D Y 2018 Acta Phys. Sin. 67 190201 (in Chinese)
|
[46] |
Connelly B D, Dickinson K J, Hammarlund S P and Kerr B 2016 Evol. Ecol. 30 267
|
[7] |
Martinezvaquero L L A, Han T A, Pereira L M and Lenaerts T 2019 Biol. Lett. 15 0143
|
[47] |
Huck S, Leutgeb J and Oprea R 2017 Nat. Commun. 8 15147
|
[8] |
Ulrich F 2019 Biol. Lett. 15 0143
|
[48] |
Cassese D 2018 Appl. Netw. Sci. 3 29
|
[9] |
Li Y M, Du W B, Yang P, Wu T H, Wu D P and Perc M 2019 IEEE Internet Things J. 6 1866
|
[49] |
Zhang W, Li Y S and Xu C 2015 Chin. Phys. Lett. 32 118901
|
[10] |
Barker J L, Bronstein J L, Friesen M L,Jones E I, Reeve H K, Zink A G and Frederickson M E 1971 Q. Rev. Biol. 46 35
|
[50] |
Lopez G R and Levinton J S 1987 Q. Rev. Biol. 62 235
|
[11] |
Trivers R L 1971 Q. Rev. Biol. 46 35
|
[51] |
Fletcher J A and Doebeli M 2009 Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B-Biol. Sci. 276 13
|
[12] |
Righi S and Takacs K 2018 Sci. Rep. 8 11149
|
[52] |
Huang Z G, Wu Z X, Wu A C, Yang L and Wang Y H 2008 Europhys. Lett. 84 50008
|
[13] |
M T, Jg F and C R 2016 Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B-Biol. Sci. 371 20150472
|
[53] |
Novak S, Chatterjee K and Nowak M A 2013 J. Theor. Biol. 334 26
|
[14] |
Manfred M, Dirk S and Krambeck H J 2002 Nature 415 424
|
[54] |
Ohtsuki H and Nowak M A 2006 J. Theor. Biol. 243 86
|
[15] |
Christoph H 2010 J. Theor. Biol. 267 22
|
[16] |
Santos F P, Santos F C and Pacheco J M 2018 Nature 555 242
|
[17] |
Sasaki T and Uchida S 2014 Biol. Lett. 10 20130903
|
[18] |
Sasaki T and Unemi T 2011 J. Theor. Biol. 287 109
|
[19] |
Forsyth P A I and Hauert C 2011 J. Math. Biol. 63 109
|
[20] |
Andreoni J, Harbaugh W and Vesterlund L 2003 Am. Econ. Rev. 93 893
|
[21] |
Boyd R and Richerson P J 1992 Ethol. Sociobiol. 13 171
|
[22] |
Li X, Jusup M, Wang Z, Li H, Lei S, Boris P, Eugene S, Shlomo H and Stefano B 2018 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 115 30
|
[23] |
Yang H X and Chen X 2018 Appl. Math. Comput. 316 460
|
[24] |
Boyd R, Gintis H and Bowles S 2010 Science 328 617
|
[25] |
James H F 2005 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102 7047
|
[26] |
Ohdaira T 2017 Chaos, Solitons and Fractals 95 77
|
[27] |
Geng Y, Shen C, Hu K and Shi L 2018 Physica A 503 540
|
[28] |
Yu T, Chen S H and Li H 2016 J. Econ. Interact. Coord. 11 313
|
[29] |
Rand D G, Nowak M A, Fowler J H and Christakis N A 2014 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111 17093
|
[30] |
Nowak M A and May R M 1992 Nature 359 826
|
[31] |
Wang X, Lv S and Quan J 2017 Physica A 482 286
|
[32] |
Wang X, Zhang L, Du X and Sun Y 2017 Nat. Comput. 16 99
|
[33] |
Xie F, Shi J and Lin J 2017 PLoS One 12 e182524
|
[34] |
Melamed D and Simpson B 2016 Soc. Networks 45 32
|
[35] |
Huang Z G, Wang S J, Xu X J and Wang Y H 2008 Europhys. Lett. 81 28001
|
[36] |
Zhao L, Ye X J, Huang Z G, Sun J T, Yang L, Do Y and Wang Y H 2010 J. Stat. Mech.-Theory Exp. 2010 P08009
|
[37] |
Perc M and Szolnoki A 2008 Phys. Rev. E 77 011904
|
[38] |
Du W B, Cao X B, Hu M B and Wang W X 2009 Europhys. Lett. 87 60004
|
[39] |
Li Y M, Zhang J and Perc M 2017 Appl. Math. Comput. 320 437
|
[40] |
Chen C Q, Dai Q L, Han W C and Yang J Z 2017 Chin. Phys. Lett. 34 028901
|
[41] |
Tao S Y, Cui M Z, Dai Q L and Yang J Z 2014 Chin. Phys. Lett. 31 110201
|
[42] |
Jianlei Z, Chunyan Z and Ming C 2015 Sci. Rep. 5 9098
|
[43] |
Fletcher J A and Zwick M 2007 J. Theor. Biol. 245 26
|
[44] |
Li Y and Ye H 2018 Appl. Math. Comput. 320 621
|
[45] |
Shimura H and Nakamaru M 2018 J. Theor. Biol. 451 46
|
[46] |
Connelly B D, Dickinson K J, Hammarlund S P and Kerr B 2016 Evol. Ecol. 30 267
|
[47] |
Huck S, Leutgeb J and Oprea R 2017 Nat. Commun. 8 15147
|
[48] |
Cassese D 2018 Appl. Netw. Sci. 3 29
|
[49] |
Zhang W, Li Y S and Xu C 2015 Chin. Phys. Lett. 32 118901
|
[50] |
Lopez G R and Levinton J S 1987 Q. Rev. Biol. 62 235
|
[51] |
Fletcher J A and Doebeli M 2009 Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B-Biol. Sci. 276 13
|
[52] |
Huang Z G, Wu Z X, Wu A C, Yang L and Wang Y H 2008 Europhys. Lett. 84 50008
|
[53] |
Novak S, Chatterjee K and Nowak M A 2013 J. Theor. Biol. 334 26
|
[54] |
Ohtsuki H and Nowak M A 2006 J. Theor. Biol. 243 86
|
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|