|
|
Robustness self-testing of states and measurements in the prepare-and-measure scenario with 3→1 random access code |
Shi-Hui Wei(魏士慧)1,2, Fen-Zhuo Guo(郭奋卓)1,2, Xin-Hui Li(李新慧)1, Qiao-Yan Wen(温巧燕)1 |
1 State Key Laboratory of Networking and Switching Technology, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing 100876, China;
2 School of Science, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing 100876, China |
|
|
Abstract Recently, Tavakoli et al. proposed a self-testing scheme in the prepare-and-measure scenario, showing that self-testing is not necessarily based on entanglement and violation of a Bell inequality[Phys. Rev. A 98 062307 (2018)]. They realized the self-testing of preparations and measurements in an N→1 (N ≥ 2) random access code (RAC), and provided robustness bounds in a 2→1 RAC. Since all N→1 RACs with shared randomness are combinations of 2→1 and 3→1 RACs, the 3→1 RAC is just as important as the 2→1 RAC. In this paper, we find a set of preparations and measurements in the 3→1 RAC, and use them to complete the robustness self-testing analysis in the prepare-and-measure scenario. The method is robust to small but inevitable experimental errors.
|
Received: 23 December 2018
Revised: 13 May 2019
Accepted manuscript online:
|
PACS:
|
03.65.Ud
|
(Entanglement and quantum nonlocality)
|
|
03.67.-a
|
(Quantum information)
|
|
03.67.Dd
|
(Quantum cryptography and communication security)
|
|
Fund: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 61572081, 61672110, and 61671082). |
Corresponding Authors:
Fen-Zhuo Guo
E-mail: gfenzhuo@bupt.edu.cn
|
Cite this article:
Shi-Hui Wei(魏士慧), Fen-Zhuo Guo(郭奋卓), Xin-Hui Li(李新慧), Qiao-Yan Wen(温巧燕) Robustness self-testing of states and measurements in the prepare-and-measure scenario with 3→1 random access code 2019 Chin. Phys. B 28 070304
|
[1] |
Acín A, Brunner N, Gisin N, Massar S, Pironio S and Scarani, V 2007 Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 230501
|
[2] |
Vazirani U and Vidick T 2014 Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 140501
|
[3] |
MillerCA and Shi Y 2016 J. ACM 63 33
|
[4] |
Tan Y G, Hu Y H and Yang H F 2016 Chin. Phys. Lett. 33 030302
|
[5] |
Reichardt B W and Unger F 2013 Nature 496 456
|
[6] |
McKague M 2016 Theory Comput. 12 1
|
[7] |
Gheorghiu A, Wallden P and Kashefi E 2017 New J. Phys. 19 023043
|
[8] |
Liu L, Gao T and Yan F 2018 Chin. Phys. B 27 020306
|
[9] |
Popescu S and Rohrlich D 1992 Phys. Lett. A 169 411
|
[10] |
Vazirani U and Vidick T 1969 Phys. Rev. Lett. 23 880
|
[11] |
Mayers D and Yao A 2004 Quant. Inf. Comp. 4 273
|
[12] |
McKague M, Yang T H and Scarani V 2012 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor 45 455304
|
[13] |
Yang T H and Navascués M 2013 Phys. Rev. A 87 050102
|
[14] |
Wu X, Cai Y, Yang T H, Le H N, Bancal J D and Scarani, V 2014 New J. Phys. 90 042339
|
[15] |
Pál K F, Vértesi T and Navascués M 2014 Phys. Rev. A 90 042340
|
[16] |
Wang Y, Wu X and Scarani V 2016 New J. Phys. 18 025021
|
[17] |
McKague M 2016 New J. Phys. 18 045013
|
[18] |
Bowles J, Šupić I, Cavalcanti D and Acín A 2018 Phys. Rev. A 98 042336
|
[19] |
Coladangelo A, Goh K T and Scarani V 2017 Nat. Commun. 8 15485
|
[20] |
Šupić I, Coladangelo A, Augusiak R and Acín A 2018 New J. Phys. 20 083041
|
[21] |
Kaniewski J 2016 Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 070402
|
[22] |
Tavakoli A, Kaniewski J, Vertesi T and Rosset D 2018 Phys. Rev. A 98 062307
|
[23] |
Ambainis A, Leung D, Mancinska L and Ozols M 2008 arXiv:0810.2937 [hep-ph]
|
[24] |
Gallego R, Brunner N, Hadley C and Acín A 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 230501
|
[25] |
Li H W, Pawlowski M, Yin Z Q, Guo G C and Han Z F 2012 Phys. Rev. A 85 052308
|
[26] |
Wang Y K, Qin S J, Wu X, Gao F and Wen Q Y 2015 Phys. Rev. A 92 052321
|
[27] |
Hayashi M, Iwama K, Nishimura H, Raymond R and Yamashita S 2006 New J. Phys. 8 129
|
[28] |
Casaccino A, Galvao E F and Severini S 2008 Phys. Rev. A 78 022310
|
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|