INTERDISCIPLINARY PHYSICS AND RELATED AREAS OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY |
Prev
Next
|
|
|
Degradation behavior of electrical properties of GaInAs (1.0 eV) and GaInAs (0.7 eV) sub-cells of IMM4J solar cells under 1-MeV electron irradiation |
Yan-Qing Zhang(张延清)1, Ming-Xue Huo(霍明学)2, Yi-Yong Wu(吴宜勇)1,2, Cheng-Yue Sun(孙承月)2, Hui-Jie Zhao(赵慧杰)1, Hong-Bin Geng(耿洪滨)1, Shuai Wang(王帅)3, Ru-Bin Liu(刘如彬)3, Qiang Sun(孙强)3 |
1 School of Materials Science & Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China;
2 Research Center of Basic Space Science, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China;
3 The 18th Research Institute of China Electronics Technology Group Corporation, Tianjin 300381, China |
|
|
Abstract In this work the degradation effects of the Ga0.7In0.3As (1.0 eV) and Ga0.42In0.58As (0.7 eV) sub-cells for IMM4J solar cells are investigated after 1-MeV electron irradiation by using spectral response and photoluminescence (PL) signal amplitude analysis, as well as electrical property measurements. The results show that, compared with the electrical properties of traditional single junction (SJ) GaAs (1.41 eV) solar cell, the electrical properties (such as Isc, Voc, and Pmax) of the newly sub-cells degrade similarly as a function of Φ, where Φ represents the electron fluence. It is found that the degradation of Voc is much more than that of Isc in the irradiated Ga0.42In0.58As (0.7 eV) cells due to the additional intrinsic layer, leading to more serious damage to the space charge region. However, of the three types of SJ cells with the gap widths of 0.7, 1.0, and 1.4 eV, the electric properties of the Ga0.7In0.3As (1.0 eV) cell decrease largest under each irradiation fluence. Analysis on the spectral response indicates that the Jsc of the Ga0.7In0.3As (1.0 eV) cell also shows the most severe damage. The PL amplitude measurements qualitatively confirm that the degradation of the effective minority carrier life-time (τeff) in the SJ Ga0.7In0.3As cells is more drastic than that of SJ GaAs cells during the irradiation. Thus, the output current of Ga0.7In0.3As sub-cell should be controlled in the irradiated IMM4J cells.
|
Received: 04 March 2017
Revised: 21 April 2017
Accepted manuscript online:
|
PACS:
|
88.40.jp
|
(Multijunction solar cells)
|
|
88.40.H-
|
(Solar cells (photovoltaics))
|
|
88.40.fh
|
(Advanced materials development)
|
|
Fund: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11475049). |
Corresponding Authors:
Yi-Yong Wu
E-mail: wuyiyong@hit.edu.cn
|
About author: 0.1088/1674-1056/26/8/ |
Cite this article:
Yan-Qing Zhang(张延清), Ming-Xue Huo(霍明学), Yi-Yong Wu(吴宜勇), Cheng-Yue Sun(孙承月), Hui-Jie Zhao(赵慧杰), Hong-Bin Geng(耿洪滨), Shuai Wang(王帅), Ru-Bin Liu(刘如彬), Qiang Sun(孙强) Degradation behavior of electrical properties of GaInAs (1.0 eV) and GaInAs (0.7 eV) sub-cells of IMM4J solar cells under 1-MeV electron irradiation 2017 Chin. Phys. B 26 088801
|
[1] |
Yamaguchi M, Takamoto T, Araki K and Ekins-Daukes N 2005 Sol. Energy 79 78
|
[2] |
Friedman D J, Geisz J F, Norman A G and Wanlass M W 2006 Conference Record of the 2006 IEEE 4th World Conference on Photovoltaic Energy Conversion, May 7-12, 2006, Waikoloa, Hawaii, USA, 1 598
|
[3] |
Wilt D and Stan M 2012 Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 51 11931
|
[4] |
France R M, Geisz J F, Steiner M A and Friedman D J 2013 The 38th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, 2012, June 3-8, Austin, USA, 3 p. 893
|
[5] |
Patel P, Aiken D, Boca A and Cho B 2011 The 37th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, 2011, June 19, Seattle, USA, 2 p. 377
|
[6] |
Wanlass M W, Ahrenkiel S P, Ahrenkiel R K and Albin D S 2005 The 31th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, 2005, January 3-7, Springs, Coronado, USA, p. 530
|
[7] |
Rehder E M, Jun B, Chiu P and Wierman S 2014 The 39th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, 2013, June 16-21, Tampa, Florida, USA, p. 3608
|
[8] |
Tatavarti R, Wibowo A, Martin G, Tuminello F, Youtsey C, Hillier G, Pan N, Wanlass M W and Romero M 2010 The 35th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, 2010, June 20-25 Honolulu, Hawaii, USA, p. 2125
|
[9] |
Ma D Y, Chen N F, Fu R, Liu H, Bai Y M, Mi Z and Chen J K 2017 Acta Phys. Sin. 66 048801 (in Chinese)
|
[10] |
Boisvert J, Law D, King R, Rehder E and Chiu P 2014 The 39th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, 2013, June 16-21, Tampa, Florida, USA, 2 p. 2790
|
[11] |
Geisz J F, France R M, Steiner M A and Friedman D J 2014 The 10th International Conference on Concentrator Photovaltics Systems, 2014, April 7-9, Albuquerque NM, USA, 1616 p. 114
|
[12] |
Zhang X R, Li B C and Liu X M 2008 Acta Phys. Sin. 57 7310 (in Chinese)
|
[13] |
Yue L, Wu Y Y, Zhang Y Q, Hu J M, Sun C Y, Hao M M and Lan M J 2014 Acta Phys. Sin. 63 188101 (in Chinese)
|
[14] |
Gao X, Yang S S, Xue Y X, Li K and Li D M 2009 Chin. Phys. B 18 5015
|
[15] |
Mehrotra A and Freundlich A 2013 The International Society for Optical Engineering (Proceedings of SPIE) 8620 10030
|
[16] |
Razykov T M, Ferekides C S, Morel D, Stefanakos E, Ullal H S and Upadhyaya H M 2011 Sol. Energy 85 1580
|
[17] |
Liu J Y, Song P, Wang F and Wang Y 2015 Chin. Phys. B 24 097801
|
[18] |
Sato S, Miyamoto H, Imaizumi M, Shimazaki K and Morioka C 2009 Sol. Energ. Mater. Sol. Cells 93 768
|
[19] |
Hu J M, Wu Y Y, Xiao J D, Yang D Z and Zhang Z W 2008 Sol. Energ. Mater. Sol. Cells 92 1652
|
[20] |
Loo R Y, Kamath G S and Li S S 1990 IEEE Trans. Electron Dev. 37 485
|
[21] |
Patel P, Aiken D, Chumney D and Cornfeld A 2012 The 38th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, 2012, June 3-8, Austin, USA, 2 1
|
[22] |
Herlufsen S, Schmidt J, Hinken D, Bothe K and Brendel R 2008 Rapid Research Letters 2 245
|
[23] |
Trupke T, Bardos R A and Abbott M D 2005 Appl. Phys. Lett. 87 184102
|
[24] |
Synopsys Inc., Sentaurus Device, Synopsys Inc.
|
[25] |
Angelis N D, Bourgoin J C, Takamoto T, Khan A and Yamaguchi M 2001 Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 66 495
|
[26] |
Levinshteim M, Rumyantsev S and Shur M 1996 Handbook Series on Semiconductor Parameters, Vol. 2 (Hong Kong: World Scientific) p. 78
|
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|