CLASSICAL AREAS OF PHENOMENOLOGY |
Prev
Next
|
|
|
Second harmonic generation in inhomogeneous MgO:LiNbO3 waveguides |
Li Guo-Hui(李国辉), Jiang Hai-Ling(蒋海灵), and Xu Xin-Ye(徐信业)† |
State Key Laboratory of Precision Spectroscopy and Department of Physics, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China |
|
|
Abstract A fibre laser at 1111.6 nm is frequency doubled by two inhomogeneous MgO:LiNbO$_{3}$ waveguides and the output powers of 85 mW and 49 mW at 555.8 nm have been generated with the conversion efficiencies of 47% and 27% respectively. By analysing the second harmonic generation temperature tuning curves, we investigate the influence of the optical inhomogeneities upon the conversion efficiency. The final result shows that the efficiency difference is mainly affected by the optical inhomogeneities in our case.
|
Received: 31 August 2010
Revised: 24 December 2010
Accepted manuscript online:
|
PACS:
|
42.55.Wd
|
(Fiber lasers)
|
|
42.60.By
|
(Design of specific laser systems)
|
|
42.65.Ky
|
(Frequency conversion; harmonic generation, including higher-order harmonic generation)
|
|
42.65.Wi
|
(Nonlinear waveguides)
|
|
Fund: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 10774044), the National Key Basic Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2010CB922903), the Shanghai Pujiang Talent Program of China (Grant No. 07PJ14038), and the Ph D Program Scholarship Fund of East China Normal University 2009 (Grant No. 2009049). |
Cite this article:
Li Guo-Hui(李国辉), Jiang Hai-Ling(蒋海灵), and Xu Xin-Ye(徐信业) Second harmonic generation in inhomogeneous MgO:LiNbO3 waveguides 2011 Chin. Phys. B 20 064201
|
[1] |
Parameswaran K R, Kurz J R, Roussev R V and Fejer M M 2002 Opt. Lett. 27 43
|
[2] |
Parameswaran K R, Route R K, Kurz J R, Roussev R V and Fejer M M 2002 Opt. Lett. 27 179
|
[3] |
Fejer M M, Magel G A, Jundt D H and Byer R L 1992 IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 28 2631
|
[4] |
Sakai K, Koyata Y and Hirano Y 2007 Opt. Lett. 32 2342
|
[5] |
Jechow A, Schedel M, Stry S, Sacher J and Menzel R 2007 Opt. Lett. 32 3035
|
[6] |
Tian X T, Li Y M, Liu Q and Zhang K S 2009 Chin. Phys. B 18 2324
|
[7] |
Nash F R, Boyd G D, Sargent M and Bridenbaugh P M 1970 J. Appl. Phys. 41 2564
|
[8] |
Bortz M L, Field S J, Fejer M M, Nam D W, Waarts R G and Welch D F 1994 IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 30 2953
|
[9] |
Helmfrid S and Arvidsson G 1991 J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 8 797
|
[10] |
Lee Y L, Noh Y C, Jung C, Yu T J, Yu B A, Lee J, Ko D K and Oh K 2005 Appl. Phys. Lett. 86 011104
|
[11] |
Zhang D L, Wu C and Pun E Y B 2010 Chin. Phys. B 19 024214
|
[12] |
Nightingale J L, Silva W J, Reade G E, Rybicki A, Kozlovsky W J and Byer R L 1986 Proc. SPIE 681 20
|
[13] |
Gayer O, Sacks Z, Galun E and Arie A 2008 Appl. Phys. B 91 343
|
[14] |
Helmfrid S, Arvidsson G and Webjörn J 1992 J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 10 222
|
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|