INTERDISCIPLINARY PHYSICS AND RELATED AREAS OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY |
Prev
Next
|
|
|
Undetermination of the relation between network synchronizability and betweenness centrality |
Wang Sheng-Jun(王圣军)a)†, Wu Zhi-Xi(吴枝喜)a)b), Dong Hai-Rong(董海荣) c), and Chen Guan-Rong(陈关荣)a) |
a Department of Electronic Engineering, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, China; b Department of Physics, Umeoa University, 90187 Umeå, Sweden; c College of Electrical and Information Engineering, Beijing Jiao Tong University, Beijing 100044, China |
|
|
Abstract Betweenness centrality is taken as a sensible indicator of the synchronizability of complex networks. To test whether betweenness centrality is a proper measure of the synchronizability in specific realizations of random networks, this paper adds edges to the networks and then evaluates the changes of betweenness centrality and network synchronizability. It finds that the two quantities vary independently.
|
Received: 06 January 2010
Revised: 27 November 2010
Accepted manuscript online:
|
PACS:
|
89.75.Hc
|
(Networks and genealogical trees)
|
|
05.45.Xt
|
(Synchronization; coupled oscillators)
|
|
Fund: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 60870013 and 10832006). |
Cite this article:
Wang Sheng-Jun(王圣军), Wu Zhi-Xi(吴枝喜), Dong Hai-Rong(董海荣), and Chen Guan-Rong(陈关荣) Undetermination of the relation between network synchronizability and betweenness centrality 2011 Chin. Phys. B 20 048903
|
[1] |
Arenas A, D'hiaz-Guilera A, Kurths J, Moreno Y and Zhou C S 2008 Phys. Rep. 469 93
|
[2] |
Barahona M and Pecora L M 2002 Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 054101
|
[3] |
Nishikawa T, Motter A E, Lai Y C and Hoppensteadt F C 2003 it Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 014101
|
[4] |
Hong H, Kim B J, Choi M Y and Park H 2004 Phys. Rev. E 69 067105
|
[5] |
Duan Z, Chen G and Huang L 2007 Phys. Rev. E 76 056103
|
[6] |
Duan Z, Wang W, Liu C and Chen G 2009 Chin. Phys. B 18 3122
|
[7] |
Fu Z Q, Yan G and Zhang Z 2009 Chin. Phys. B 18 2209
|
[8] |
Jalili M, Rad A A and Hasler M 2008 Phys. Rev. E 78 016105
|
[9] |
Zhao M, Zhou T, Wang B H, Yan G, Yang H J and Bai W J 2006 it Physica A 371 773
|
[10] |
Kim D H and Motter A E 2007 Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 248701
|
[11] |
Freeman L C 1977 Sociometry 40 35
|
[12] |
Newman M E J 2001 Phys. Rev. E 64 016132
|
[13] |
Pecora L M and Carroll T L 1998 Phys. Rev. Lett. 80 2109
|
[14] |
Fink K S, Johnson G, Carroll T, Mar D and Pecora L 2000 Phys. Rev. E 61 5080
|
[15] |
Barahona M and Pecora L M 2002 Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 054101
|
[16] |
Boccaletti S, Latora V, Moreno Y, Chavez M and Hwang D U 2006 it Phys. Rep. 424 175
|
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|