Abstract A meshless particle method based on the smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) method is first proposed for the numerical prediction of physical phenomena of nonlinear solitary wave propagation and complex phenomena arising from the inelastic interactions of solitary waves. The method is a fully discrete implicit scheme. This method does not rely on a grid, avoids the need to solve for derivatives of kernel functions, and makes the calculation more convenient. Additionally, the unique solvability of the proposed implicit scheme is proved. To verify the effectiveness and flexibility of the proposed method, we apply it to solving various time fractional nonlinear Schrödinger equations (TF-NLSE) on both regular and irregular domains. This mainly includes general or coupled TF-NLSE with or without analytical solutions. Moreover, the proposed method is compared with the existing methods. Through examples, it has been verified that this method can effectively predict complex propagation phenomena generated by the collision of nonlinear solitary waves, such as the collapse phenomenon of solitary waves with increasing fractional-order parameters. Research results indicate that this method provides a new and effective meshless method for predicting the propagation of nonlinear solitary waves, which can better simulate TF-NLSE in complex domains.
Luyang Ma(马璐阳), Rahmatjan Imin(热合买提江·依明), and Azhar Halik(艾孜海尔·哈力克) Study and application of solitary wave propagation at fractional order of time based on SPH method 2025 Chin. Phys. B 34 050202
[1] Wu Q and Huang J H 2016 Fractional Calculus (Beijing: Tsinghua University Press) (in Chinese) [2] Dehghan M, Manafian J and Saadatmandi A 2010 Numer. Meth. Partial Differ. Equ. 24 448 [3] Rialland G 2024 Nonlinear Anal. 241 113474 [4] Zhou S and Cheng X 2010 Math. Comput. Simulat. 80 2362 [5] Wang X M, Zhang L L and Hu X X 2020 Optik 219 164989 [6] Diethelm K and Ford N J 2002 J. Math. Anal. Appl. 265 229 [7] Sun Z Z and Gao G H 2020 Fractional Differential Equations: Finite Difference Methods (Germany: De Gruyter) [8] Laskin N 2002 Phys. Rev. E 66 056108 [9] Naber M 2004 J. Math. Phys. 45 3339 [10] Amore P, Fernández F M and Hofmann C P 2010 J. Math. Phys. 51 122101 [11] Khoso A I, Katbar M N and Akram U 2023 Quantum Rep. 5 546 [12] Shi L and Zhou X 2022 Results Phys. 42 105967 [13] Mohebbi A, Abbaszadeh M and Dehghan M 2013 Eng. Anal. Bound. Elem. 37 475 [14] Laskin N 2000 Phys. Rev. E 62 3135 [15] Mao Z P and Karniadakis G E 2018 SIAM J. Numeri. Anal. 56 24 [16] Shivanian E and Jafarabadi A 2017 Numer. Methods Partial Differ. Equ. 33 1043 [17] Alrebdi T A, Arshed S and Raza N 2023 Results Phys. 52 106809 [18] Wang X M, Zhang L L and Hu X X 2020 Optik 219 164989 [19] Ma W X 2022 Chin. Phys. Lett. 39 100201 [20] Eskar R, Feng X and Kasim E 2020 Adv. Differ. Equ. 2020 492 [21] Chen X, Di Y and Duan J 2018 Appl. Math. Lett. 84 160 [22] Dehghan M and Mirzaei D 2008 Eng. Anal. Bound. Elem. 32 747 [23] Liaqat M I and Akgül A 2022 Chaos, Solitons and Fractals 162 1043 [24] Mardani A, HooshmandaslMR and HeydariMH 2017 Comput. Math. Appl. 75 122 [25] Xu Y, Sun H G and Zhang Y 2023 Comput. Math. Appl. 142 107 [26] Wong A Y and Cheung P Y 1984 Phys. Rev. Lett. 52 1222 [27] Klein C, Sparber C and Markowich P 2014 Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Math., Phys. Eng. Sci. 470 20140364 [28] Chen M, Zeng S and Lu D 2018 Phys. Rev. E 98 022211 [29] Yao Y, Yi H and Zhang X 2023 Chin. Phys. Lett. 40 100503 [30] Qin Z 2022 Chin. Phys. Lett. 39 010501 [31] Zhou S and Cheng X 2010 Math. Comput. Simulat. 80 2362 [32] Wei L, Zhang X and Kumar S 2012 Comput. Math. Appl. 64 2603 [33] Hu H Z, Chen Y P and Zhou J W 2024 J. Comput. Math. 42 1124 [34] Jiang T, Jiang R R and Huang J J 2021 Chin. Phys. B 30 194 [35] Abbaszadeh M, Azis M I and Dehghan M 2024 Eng. Anal. Bound. Elem. 169 105932 [36] Heydari M H, Hosseininia M and Atangana A 2020 Eng. Anal. Bound. Elem. 120 166 [37] Okposo N I, Veeresha P and Okposo E N 2022 Chin. J. Phys. 77 965 [38] Jiang T, Liu Y H, Li Q, Ren J L and Wang D S 2024 Comput. Phys. Commun. 296 109023 [39] Abbas K, Yuma S, Chun Lee Antonio G, Hitoshi G and Javier B 2024 Comput. Part. Mech. 11 1055 [40] Xu X Y, Cheng J, Peng S and Yu P 2024 Eng. Anal. Bound. Elem. 158 473 [41] Hosseini K, Hincal E and Obi O A 2023 Opt. Quant. Electron. 55 599 [42] Li Y, Jiang R R and Jiang T 2022 Appl. Math. Mech. 43 1016 (in Chinese) [43] Mokhtari R and Mostajeran F 2020 Commun. Appl. Math. Comput. 2 1 [44] Feng D Y and Imin R 2023 Results Appl. Math. 17 100355 [45] Yang X F, Peng S L and Liu M B 2014 Appl. Math. Model. 38 3822 [46] Hadhoud A R, Rageh A A M and Radwan T 2022 Fractal Fract. 6 127 [47] Wang T, Guo B and Xu Q 2013 J. Comput. Phys. 243 382 [48] Sun Z and Wu X 2006 Appl. Numer. Math. 56 193 [49] Gao G, Sun Z and Zhang H 2014 J. Comput. Phys. 259 33 [50] Liu G R and LiuMB 2003 Smoothed particle hydrodynamics: a meshfree particle method (Singapore: World Scientific)
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
