INTERDISCIPLINARY PHYSICS AND RELATED AREAS OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY |
Prev
Next
|
|
|
Study of leakage current degradation based on stacking faults expansion in irradiated SiC junction barrier Schottky diodes |
Maojiu Luo(罗茂久)1, Yourun Zhang(张有润)1,†, Yucheng Wang(王煜丞)1, Hang Chen(陈航)2, Rong Zhou(周嵘)2, Zhi Wang(王智)2, Chao Lu(陆超)2, and Bo Zhang(张波)1 |
1 State Key Laboratory of Electronic Thin Films and Integrated Devices, School of Integrated Circuit Science and Engineering, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 611731, China; 2 China Zhenhua Group Yongguang Electronics Co., Ltd., Guiyang 550018, China |
|
|
Abstract A comprehensive investigation was conducted to explore the degradation mechanism of leakage current in SiC junction barrier Schottky (JBS) diodes under heavy ion irradiation. We propose and verify that the generation of stacking faults (SFs) induced by the recombination of massive electron-hole pairs during irradiation is the cause of reverse leakage current degradation based on experiments results. The irradiation experiment was carried out based on Ta ions with high linear energy transfer (LET) of 90.5 MeV/(mg/cm$^{2}$). It is observed that the leakage current of the diode undergoes the permanent increase during irradiation when biased at 20% of the rated reverse voltage. Micro-PL spectroscopy and PL micro-imaging were utilized to detect the presence of SFs in the irradiated SiC JBS diodes. We combined the degraded performance of irradiated samples with SFs introduced by heavy ion irradiation. Finally, three-dimensional (3D) TCAD simulation was employed to evaluate the excessive electron-hole pairs (EHPs) concentration excited by heavy ion irradiation. It was observed that the excessive hole concentration under irradiation exceeded significantly the threshold hole concentration necessary for the expansion of SFs in the substrate. The proposed mechanism suggests that the process and material characteristics of the silicon carbide should be considered in order to reinforcing against the single event effect of SiC power devices.
|
Received: 12 June 2024
Revised: 04 July 2024
Accepted manuscript online: 12 July 2024
|
PACS:
|
84.30.Jc
|
(Power electronics; power supply circuits)
|
|
61.80.-x
|
(Physical radiation effects, radiation damage)
|
|
61.80.Az
|
(Theory and models of radiation effects)
|
|
61.80.Jh
|
(Ion radiation effects)
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
Yourun Zhang
E-mail: yrzhang@uestc.edu.cn
|
Cite this article:
Maojiu Luo(罗茂久), Yourun Zhang(张有润), Yucheng Wang(王煜丞), Hang Chen(陈航), Rong Zhou(周嵘), Zhi Wang(王智), Chao Lu(陆超), and Bo Zhang(张波) Study of leakage current degradation based on stacking faults expansion in irradiated SiC junction barrier Schottky diodes 2024 Chin. Phys. B 33 108401
|
[1] Zhu L, Chow T P, Jones K A and Agarwal A 2006 IEEE Trans. Electron Dev. 53 363 [2] Piszczor M, McNatt J, Mercer C, Kerslake T and Pappa R 2012 38th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, 2012, Austin, TX, USA, p. 3287 [3] Barry A L, Lehmann B, Fritsch D and Braunig D 1991 IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 38 1111 [4] Javanainen A, Galloway K F, Nicklaw C, et al. 2017 IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 64 415 [5] Javanainen A, Galloway K F, Nicklaw C, et al. 2017 IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 64 2031 [6] Abbate C, et al. 2015 IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 62 202 [7] Witulski A F, et al. 2018 IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 65 256 [8] Ball D R, et al. 2020 IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 67 22 [9] Wu Z K, Bai Y, et al. 2022 IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 69 932 [10] Martinella C, Bathen M E, Javanainen A and Grossner U 2023 Mater. Sci. Forum 1090 179 [11] Für N, Belanche M, Martinella C, Kumar P, Bathen M E and Grossner U 2023 IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 70 1892 [12] Konishi K, Fujita R and Shima A 2019 J. Electron. Mater. 48 1704 [13] Brosselard P, et al. 2008 Mater. Sci. Forum 600-603 935 [14] Galeckas A, et al. 2006 Mater. Sci. Forum 527-529 395 [15] Gan F, Suda J and Kimoto T 2009 Physica B 404 4745 [16] Na M, Bahng W, Jung H, Oh C, Jang D and Hong S 2024 Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 175 108247 [17] Tsunenobu K and Heiji W 2020 Appl. Phys. Express 13 120101 [18] Mashi K, Shinya K, Yoshihito I, Shunta H and Tsunenobu K 2018 J. Appl. Phys 124 095702 [19] Godet J, et al. 2009 Phys. Rev. B 73 092105 [20] Galeckas A, Hallén A, et al. 2006 Phys. Rev. B 74 233203 [21] Galeckas A, Linnros, et al. 2006 Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 025502 [22] Skowronski M, et al. 2002 J. Appl. Phys. 92 4699 [23] Ishikawa Y, et al. 2018 J. Appl. Phys. 123 225101 [24] Yakimov E E and Yakimov E B 2020 J. Alloys Compd. 837 155470 [25] Yao Y Z, Yoshihiro S, et al. 2011 J. Appl. Phys 109 123524 [26] Chen B, et al. 2008 Appl. Phys. Lett. 93 033514 [27] Tawara T, et al. 2018 J. Appl. Phys 123 025707 [28] Tomoyuki Shoji, et al. 2014 Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 53 04EP03 [29] Zhang H, et al. 2023 Chin. Phys. B 32 028504 [30] Joshua D, Caldwell, et al. 2010 J. Appl. Phys. 108 044503 |
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|