ELECTROMAGNETISM, OPTICS, ACOUSTICS, HEAT TRANSFER, CLASSICAL MECHANICS, AND FLUID DYNAMICS |
Prev
Next
|
|
|
Measurement and verification of concentration-dependent diffusion coefficient: Ray tracing imagery of diffusion process |
Li Wei(魏利)1, Wei-Dong Meng(孟伟东)1,2, Li-Cun Sun(孙丽存)3, Xin-Fei Cao(曹新飞)1, Xiao-Yun Pu(普小云)1,2 |
1 Department of Physics, Yunnan University, Kunming 650091, China; 2 Key Laboratory of Quantum Information of Yunnan Province, Yunnan University, Kunming 650091, China; 3 Department of Physics, Yunnan Normal University, Kunming 650504, China |
|
|
Abstract Ray tracing method is used to study the propagation of collimated beams in a liquid-core cylindrical lens (LCL), which has dual functions of diffusion cell and image formation. The diffusion images on the focal plane of the used LCL are simulated by establishing and solving both linear and nonlinear ray equations, the calculated results indicate that the complex imaging results of LCL in inhomogeneous media can be treated by the law of ray propagation in homogeneous media under the condition of small refractive index gradient of diffusion solution. Guided by the calculation conditions, the diffusion process of triethylene glycol aqueous solution is experimentally studied at room temperature by using the LCL in this paper. The spatial and temporal concentration profile Ce(z, t) of diffusion solution is obtained by analyzing diffusion image appearing on the focal plane of the LCL; Then, the concentration-dependent diffusion coefficient is assumed to be a polynomial D(C)=D0×(1+α1C+α2C2+α3C3+…). The finite difference method is used to solve the Fick diffusion equation for calculating numerically the concentration profiles Cn(z, t). The D(C) of triethylene glycol aqueous solution is obtained by comparing the Cn(z,t) with Ce(z, t). Finally, the obtained polynomial D(C) is used to calculate the refractive index profiles nn(z, t)s of diffusion solution in the used LCL. Based on the ray propagation law in inhomogeneous media and the calculated n(z,t), the ray tracing method is used again to simulate the dynamic images of the whole experimental diffusion process to varify the correctness of the calculated D(C). The method presented in this work opens up a new way for both measuring and verifying the concentration-dependent liquid diffusion coefficients.
|
Received: 25 February 2020
Revised: 20 April 2020
Accepted manuscript online:
|
PACS:
|
42.62.Eh
|
(Metrological applications; optical frequency synthesizers for precision spectroscopy)
|
|
07.60.-j
|
(Optical instruments and equipment)
|
|
42.25.Dd
|
(Wave propagation in random media)
|
|
42.15.Dp
|
(Wave fronts and ray tracing)
|
|
Fund: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11804296), the Joint Key Project of Yunnan Province, China (Grant Nos. 2018FY001-020 and 2018ZI002), and the Fund from the Educational Department of Yunnan Province, China (Grant No. 2016CYH05). |
Corresponding Authors:
Xiao-Yun Pu
E-mail: xypu@163.com
|
Cite this article:
Li Wei(魏利), Wei-Dong Meng(孟伟东), Li-Cun Sun(孙丽存), Xin-Fei Cao(曹新飞), Xiao-Yun Pu(普小云) Measurement and verification of concentration-dependent diffusion coefficient: Ray tracing imagery of diffusion process 2020 Chin. Phys. B 29 084206
|
[1] |
Meng W D, Xia Y, Song F X and Pu X Y 2017 Opt. Express 25 5626
|
[2] |
Sun L C, Du C, Li Q and Pu X Y 2016 Appl. Opt. 55 2011
|
[3] |
Kim B, Yang J, Lee D, Choi B, Hyeon T and Park J 2018 Adv. Mater. 30 1703316
|
[4] |
Cussler E L 2009 Diffusion:Mass Transfer in Fluid Systems, 3nd edn. (New York:Cambridge University Press) pp. 126-134
|
[5] |
Zhang J X 2018 Appl. Therm. Eng. 129 564
|
[6] |
Ali H, Zhang D, Wagner J and Park C 2018 Energies 11 899
|
[7] |
Ju Y Y, Zhang Q M, Gong Z Z and Ji G F 2013 Chin. Phys. B 22 083101
|
[8] |
Li Q and Pu X Y 2013 Acta Phys. Sin. 62 094206 (in Chinese)
|
[9] |
Wolff L, Zangi P, Brands T, Rausch M H, Koß H J, Fröoba A P and Bardow A 2018 Int. J. Thermophys. 39 133
|
[10] |
Siebel D, Scharfer P and Schabel W 2015 Macromolecules 48 8608
|
[11] |
Leonhardt U 2009 New. J. Phys. 11 093
|
[12] |
Moore D T 1980 Appl. Opt. 19 1035
|
[13] |
Crank J 1975 The Mathematics of Diffusion, 2nd edn. (London:Oxford University Press) pp. 104-137
|
[14] |
Zhong X H 2003 Modern fundamentals of optics (Beijing:Peking University Press) pp. 22-25
|
[15] |
Zhao J M, Tan J Y and Liu L H 2015 J. Quantum Spectrosc. Rad. 152 114
|
[16] |
Wu C Y and Hou M F 2012 Int. J. Heat. Mass. Transfer 55 6600
|
[17] |
Luneburg R K and Herzberger M 1964 Mathematical theory of optics (Berkeley:University of California Press) pp. 100-125
|
[18] |
Navarro R and Moreno-Barriuso E 1999 Opt. Lett. 24 951
|
[19] |
Schurig D, Pendry J B and Smith D R 2006 Opt. Express 14 9794
|
[20] |
Taflove A and Hagness S C 2005 Computational electrodynamics:the finite-difference time-domain method, 3nd edn. (Boston:Artech House) pp. 35-50
|
[21] |
Murio D A 2008 Comput. Math. Appl. 56 1138
|
[22] |
Fernández-Sempere J, Ruiz-Beviá F, Colom-Valiente J and Más-Pérez F 1996 J. Chem. Eng. Data 41 47
|
[23] |
Bogacheva I S, Zemdikhanov K B and Usmanov A G 1982 Izv. Vyssh. Uchebn. Zaved., Khim. Khim. Tekhnol. 25 182
|
[24] |
Sun L C, Meng W D and Pu X Y 2015 Opt. Express 23 23155
|
[25] |
Rashidnia N and Balasubramaniam R 2002 Appl. Opt. 41 1337
|
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|