|
|
Influence of matrigel on the shape and dynamics of cancer cells |
Teng Ye(叶腾)1, Feng Qiu(邱峰)1,2 |
First Clinical Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China, Department of Oncology, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China |
|
|
Abstract The interaction between extracellular matrices and cancer cells plays an important role in regulating cancer cell behaviors. In this article, we use matrigel to mimic extracellular matrices and investigate experimentally how matrigel influences the shape and dynamics of breast cancer cells (MDA-MB-231-GFP cells). We find that matrigel facilitates cancer cells' migration and shape deformation. The influences of the matrigel concentration are also reported.
|
Received: 28 August 2019
Revised: 06 September 2019
Accepted manuscript online:
|
PACS:
|
87.17.-d
|
(Cell processes)
|
|
87.17.Jj
|
(Cell locomotion, chemotaxis)
|
|
87.18.Ed
|
(Cell aggregation)
|
|
05.40.Jc
|
(Brownian motion)
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
Feng Qiu
E-mail: lukeqiubmu@163.com
|
Cite this article:
Teng Ye(叶腾), Feng Qiu(邱峰) Influence of matrigel on the shape and dynamics of cancer cells 2019 Chin. Phys. B 28 108704
|
[1] |
Weidner N, Folkman J, Pozza F, Bevilacqua P, Allred E N, Moore D H, Meli S and Gasparini G 1992 J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 84 1875
|
[2] |
Spaeth E L, Dembinski J L, Sasser A K, Watson K, Klopp A, Hall B, Andreeff M and Marini F 2009 PLoS One 4 e4992
|
[3] |
Whiteside T L 2008 Oncogene 27 5904
|
[4] |
Rejniak K A 2016 Systems Biology of Tumor Microenvironment: Quantitative Modeling and Simulations (Berlin: Springer Int Publishing AG) p. 73
|
[5] |
Hockel M and Vaupel P 2001 J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 93 266
|
[6] |
Xu R, Boudreau A and Bissell M 2009 Cancer Metastasis Rev. 28 167
|
[7] |
Coussens L M and Werb Z 1996 Chem. Biol. 3 895
|
[8] |
Hanahan D and Weinberg R A 2000 Cell 100 57
|
[9] |
Garbett E A, Reed M W R and Brown N J 1999 Br. J. Cancer 81 287
|
[10] |
Provenzano P P, Inman D R, Eliceiri K W, Knittel J G, Yan L, Rueden C T, White J G and Keely P J 2008 BMC Med. 6 11
|
[11] |
Levental K R, Yu H, Kass L, Lakins J N, Egeblad M, Erler J T, Fong S F T, Csiszar K, Giaccia A, Weninger W, Yamauchi M, Gasser D L and Weaver V M 2009 Cell 139 891
|
[12] |
Rowe R G and Weiss S J 2008 Trends Cell Biol. 18 560
|
[13] |
Kalluri R 2003 Nat. Rev. Cancer 3 422
|
[14] |
Kleinman H K and Martin G R 2005 Semin. Cancer Biol. 15 378
|
[15] |
Hughes C S, Postovit L M and Lajoie G A 2010 Proteomics 10 1886
|
[16] |
Price K J, Tsykin A, Giles K M, Sladic R T, Epis M R, Ganss R, Goodall G J and Leedman P J 2012 Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 427 343
|
[17] |
Badea M A, Balas M, Hermenean A, Ciceu A, Herman H, Ionita D and Dinischiotu A 2019 SLAS Discovery : Advancing Life Sciences R & D 24 563
|
[18] |
Piccinini F, Kiss A and Horvath P 2016 Bioinformatics 32 955
|
[19] |
Gorelik R and Gautreau A 2014 Nat. Protoc. 9 1931
|
[20] |
Park J A, Kim J H, Bi D, et al. 2015 Nat. Mater. 14 1040
|
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|