INTERDISCIPLINARY PHYSICS AND RELATED AREAS OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY |
Prev
Next
|
|
|
Detailed study of NBTI characterization in 40-nm CMOS process using comprehensive models |
Yan Zeng(曾严)1, Xiao-Jin Li(李小进)1, Jian Qing(卿健)1, Ya-Bin Sun(孙亚宾)1, Yan-Ling Shi(石艳玲)1, Ao Guo(郭奥)2, Shao-Jian Hu(胡少坚)2 |
1. Shanghai Key Laboratory of Multidimensional Information Processing and Department of Electrical Engineering, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China; 2. Shanghai Integrated Circuit Research & Development Center, Shanghai 201203, China |
|
|
Abstract The impact of negative bias temperature instability (NBTI) can be ascribed to three mutually uncorrelated factors, including hole trapping by pre-existing traps (△ VHT) in gate insulator, generated traps (△ VOT) in bulk insulator, and interface trap generation (△ VIT). In this paper, we have experimentally investigated the NBTI characteristic for a 40-nm complementary metal-oxide semiconductor (CMOS) process. The power-law time dependence, temperature activation, and field acceleration have also been explored based on the physical reaction-diffusion model. Moreover, the end-of-life of stressed device dependent on the variation of stress field and temperature have been evaluated. With the consideration of locking effect, the recovery characteristics have been modelled and discussed.
|
Received: 04 June 2017
Revised: 26 June 2017
Accepted manuscript online:
|
PACS:
|
85.30.De
|
(Semiconductor-device characterization, design, and modeling)
|
|
77.55.df
|
(For silicon electronics)
|
|
66.30.J-
|
(Diffusion of impurities ?)
|
|
Fund: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 61574056 and 61204038), the Natural Science Funds of Shanghai, China (Grant No. 14ZR1412000), the Fund from the Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (Grant No. 14DZ2260800), and Shanghai Sailing Program (Grant No. 17YF1404700). |
Corresponding Authors:
Xiao-Jin Li, Xiao-Jin Li
E-mail: xjli@ee.ecnu.edu.cn;ybsun@ee.ecnu.edu.cn
|
Cite this article:
Yan Zeng(曾严), Xiao-Jin Li(李小进), Jian Qing(卿健), Ya-Bin Sun(孙亚宾), Yan-Ling Shi(石艳玲), Ao Guo(郭奥), Shao-Jian Hu(胡少坚) Detailed study of NBTI characterization in 40-nm CMOS process using comprehensive models 2017 Chin. Phys. B 26 108503
|
[1] |
Tang H L, Xu B L, Zhuang Y Q, Zhang L and Li C 2016 Acta Phys. Sin. 65 168502(in Chinese)
|
[2] |
Krishnan A T, Reddy V, Chakravarthi S, Rodriguez J, John S and Krishnan S 2003 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting, 8-10 December, 2003, p. 14.5.1
|
[3] |
Liu H X and Hao Y 2016 Chin. Phys. 16 2111
|
[4] |
Cao Y R, Ma X H, Hao Y and Hu S G 2010 Chin. Phys. B 19 047307
|
[5] |
Joshi K, Mukhopadhyay S, Goel N and Mahapatra S 2012 IEEE International Reliability Physics Symposium, 15-19 April, 2012, p. 5A.3.1
|
[6] |
Mahapatra S (ed.) 2016 Fundamentals of Bias Temperature Instability in MOS Transistors (New Delhi:Springer) pp. 209-263
|
[7] |
Goel N, Joshi K, Mukhopadhyay S, Nanaware N and Mahapatra S 2014 Microelectron. Rel. 54 491
|
[8] |
Mahapatra S, Goel N, Desai S, Gupta S, Jose B, Mukhopadhyay S, Joshi K, Jain A, Islam A E and Alam M A 2013 IEEE Trans. Electron Dev. 60 901
|
[9] |
Parihar N, Goel N, Chaudhary A and Mahapatra S 2016 IEEE Trans. Electron Dev. 63 946
|
[10] |
Mahapatra S, Islam A, Deora S, Maheta V, Joshi K, Jain A and Alam M, 2011 International Reliability Physics Symposium, 10-14 April, 2011, p. 6A.3.1
|
[11] |
Desai S, Mukhopadhyay S, Goel N, Nanaware N, Jose B, Joshi K and Mahapatra S 2013 IEEE International Reliability Physics Symposium, 14-18 April, 2013, p. XT.2.1
|
[12] |
Yoshiki Y 2014 Microelectron. Rel. 54 520
|
[13] |
Krishnan A T, Chancellor C, Chakravarthi S, Nicollian P E, Reddy V, Varghese A, Khamankar R B and Krishnan S 2005 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting Technical Digest, 5-7 December, 2005, p. 691
|
[14] |
Joshi K, Mukhopadhyay S, Goel N, Nanware N and Mahapatra S 2014 IEEE Trans. Electron Dev. 61 408
|
[15] |
Mahapatra S (ed.) 2016 Fundamentals of Bias Temperature Instability in MOS Transistors (New Delhi:Springer), pp. 127-179
|
[16] |
Mahapatra S, Kumar P B and Alam M A 2004 IEEE Trans. Electron Dev. 51 1371
|
[17] |
Mahapatra S, Huard V, Kerber A, Reddy V, Kalpat S and Haggag A 2014 IEEE International Reliability Physics Symposium Proceedings, 1-5 June, 2014, p. 3B.1.1
|
[18] |
Nozomu K, Yasuhiro D and Nobuyuki W 2009 Microelectron. Rel. 49 989
|
[19] |
Rangan S, Mielke N and Yeh E C C 2003 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting Technical Digest, 8-10 December, 2003, p. 14.3.1
|
[20] |
Deora S, Maheta V, Islam A, Alam M, and Mahapatra S 2009 IEEE Electron Dev. Lett. 30 978
|
[21] |
Cao Y R, Yang Y, Cao C, He W L, Zheng X F, Ma X H and Hao Y 2015 Chin. Phys. B 24 097304
|
[22] |
Kumar S V, Kim C H, Sapatnekar S S 2009 IEEE Trans. Dev. Mater. Rel. 9 537
|
[23] |
Goel N, Naphade T and Mahapatra S 2015 IEEE International Reliability Physics Symposium, 19-23 April, 2015, p. 4A.3.1
|
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|