| CONDENSED MATTER: ELECTRONIC STRUCTURE, ELECTRICAL, MAGNETIC, AND OPTICAL PROPERTIES |
Prev
Next
|
|
|
Prediction of material parameters of spin textures from LTEM images by machine learning models CNN and ViT |
| Bohan Li(李博涵)1, Xinyuan Zhang(张歆媛)2, Guanhua Chen(陈冠桦)2, and Lin Chen(陈琳)2,† |
1 School of Computer Science, Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Nanjing 210003, China; 2 College of Electronic and Optical Engineering, Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Nanjing 210023, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Machine learning (ML) models were trained to predict the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction constant $D$ and anisotropy constant $K$ of spin textures from Lorentz transmission electron microscopy (LTEM) images. Two ML models, convolutional neural network (CNN) and vision transformer (ViT), were trained, tested and employed to predict the values of $D$ and $K$. Firstly, training and testing datasets composed of 9300 topological spin textures were prepared using the micromagnetic simulation method with the values of $D$ and $K$ randomly chosen. Secondly, the performance of the CNN model for predicting $D$ and $K$ values was investigated by varying the number of training data, the pooling process, and the number of fully connected layers, which indicated high prediction accuracies. Thirdly, better performance of the ViT model for predicting $D$ and $K$ values was achieved with the coefficient of determination $R^{2}$ reaching as high as 0.9987 and 0.9991 for predicting $D$ and $K$ values, respectively. Particularly, the reliance on synthetic data and noise robustness was discussed. Finally, the prediction abilities of CNN and ViT models were evaluated and compared. The results of this research indicate that the ML models can achieve the material parameters directly and effectively from LTEM images, and this process may contribute to the design of advanced devices based on the topological spin textures.
|
Received: 23 December 2025
Revised: 24 March 2026
Accepted manuscript online: 10 April 2026
|
|
PACS:
|
75.25.-j
|
(Spin arrangements in magnetically ordered materials (including neutron And spin-polarized electron studies, synchrotron-source x-ray scattering, etc.))
|
| |
75.78.Cd
|
(Micromagnetic simulations ?)
|
| |
87.19.lv
|
(Learning and memory)
|
| |
07.05.Tp
|
(Computer modeling and simulation)
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
Lin Chen
E-mail: cl@njupt.edu.cn
|
Cite this article:
Bohan Li(李博涵), Xinyuan Zhang(张歆媛), Guanhua Chen(陈冠桦), and Lin Chen(陈琳) Prediction of material parameters of spin textures from LTEM images by machine learning models CNN and ViT 2026 Chin. Phys. B 35 077507
|
[1] Fert A, Reyren N and Cros V 2017 Nat. Rev. Mater. 2 17031 [2] Göbel B, Mertig I and Tretiakov O A 2021 Phys. Rep. 895 1 [3] He Q L, Hughes T L, Armitage N P, Tokura Y andWang K L 2022 Nat. Mater. 21 15 [4] Jiang L X, Li Q C, Zhang X, Li J F, Zhang J, Chen Z X, Zeng M and Wu H 2024 Acta Phys. Sin. 73 017505 (in Chinese) [5] Yang H X, Liang J H and Cui Q R 2023 Nat. Rev. Phys. 5 43 [6] Zhao X P and Zhao J H 2025 npj Spintronics 3 25 [7] Mühlbauer S, Binz B, Jonietz F, Pfleiderer C, Rosch A, Neubauer A, Georgii R and Boni P 2009 Science 323 915 [8] Kahmann T, Laureen Rösch E, Enpuku K, Yoshida T and Ludwig F 2021 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 519 167402 [9] Masood K I, Raich R, Jander A and Dhagat P 2024 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 610 172562 [10] Kuepferling M, Casiraghi A, Soares G, Durin G, Garcia-Sanchez F, Chen L, Back C H, Marrows C H, Tacchi S and Carlotti G 2023 Rev. Mod. Phys. 95 015003 [11] Phatak C, Petford-Long A K and De Graef M 2016 Curr. Opin. Solid St. M. 20 107 [12] Kang S, Töllner M, Wang D, Minnert C, Durst K, Caron A, Dunin- Borkowski R E, McCord J, Kübel C and Mu X 2025 Nat. Commun. 16 1305 [13] Tang J, Kong L Y,WangWW, Du H F and Tian M L 2019 Chin. Phys. B 28 087503 [14] Marchiori E, Ceccarelli L, Rossi N, Lorenzelli L, Degen C L and Poggio M 2022 Nat. Rev. Phys. 4 49 [15] Habenschaden C, Sievers S, Klasen A, Cerreta A and Schumacher H W 2024 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 95 113704 [16] Kazakova O, Puttock R, Barton C, Corte-León H, Jaafar M, Neu V and Asenjo A 2019 J. Appl. Phys. 125 060901 [17] Allen E A and Tkatchenko A 2022 Sci. Adv. 8 eabm7185 [18] Li Q, Fu N, Omee S S and Hu J 2024 npj Comput. Mater. 10 245 [19] Mobarak M H, Mimona M A, Islam M A, Hossain N, Zohura F T, Imtiaz I and Rimon M I H 2023 Appl. Surf. Sci. Adv. 18 100523 [20] Ma W, Liu Z C, Kudyshev Z A, Boltasseva A, Cai W S and Liu Y M 2021 Nat. Photon. 15 77 [21] Liu D Y, Xu L M, Lin X M, Wei X, Yu W J, Wang Y and Wei Z M 2022 Chip 1 100033 [22] He W W, Li J Z, Kong X and Deng L 2024 Commun. Eng. 3 151 [23] Li J, Fang W Q, Jin S J, Suo C Y, Zhang T D, Wu Y L, Xu X D, Liu Y and Yao D X 2025 AI Sci. 1 015001 [24] Karniadakis G E, Kevrekidis I G, Lu L, Perdikaris P, Wang S F and Yang L 2021 Nat. Rev. Phys. 3 422 [25] Choubisa H, Todorović P, Pina J M, Parmar D H, Li Z L, Voznyy O, Tamblyn I and Sargent E H 2023 npj Comput. Mater. 9 117 [26] Shi S W, Chu S B, Xie Y E and Chen Y P 2025 Phys. Scr. 100 015957 [27] Chen G H, Yao J C, Zhu H F, Zhi T, Wang J, Xue J J, Chen L, Tao T and Tao Z K 2025 Acta Phys. Sin. 74 190203 (in Chinese) [28] Mehmood N, Wang J B and Liu Q F 2022 J. Appl. Phys. 132 043904 [29] McCray A R C, Zhou T, Kandel S, Petford-Long A, CherukaraMJ and Phatak C 2024 npj Comput. Mater. 10 111 [30] McCray A R C, Bender A, Petford-Long A and Phatak C 2024 APL Mach. Learn. 2 026120 [31] Beg M, Lang M and Fangohr H 2022 IEEE Trans. Magn. 58 7300205 [32] Beleggia M and Zhu Y 2010 Philos. Mag. 83 1045 [33] Chen X W, Yang L Y, Savchenko A, Yang D H, Shi W, Denneulin T, Kiselev N S, Jin L, Song D S, Dunin-Borkowski R E and Zheng F S 2025 Phys. Rev. B 112 214455 [34] Haug T, Otto S, Schneider M and Zweck J 2003 Ultramicroscopy 96 201 [35] Walton S K, Zeissler K, Branford W R and Felton S 2013 IEEE Trans. Magn. 49 4795 [36] Holt S J R, Lang M, Loudon J C, Hichken T J, Suess D, Cortes-Ortuno D, Pathak S A, Beg M, Zulfiqar K and Fangohr H 2025 npj Comput. Mater. 11 20 [37] Yu X Z, Onose Y, Kanazawa N, Park J H, Han J H, Matsui Y, Nagaosa N and Tokura Y 2010 Nature 465 901 [38] Yu X Z, Kanazawa N, Onose Y, Kimoto K, Zhang W Z, Ishiwata S, Matsui Y and Tokura Y 2011 Nat. Mater. 10 106 [39] Yu X Z, Koshibae W, Tokunaga Y, Shibata K, Taguchi Y, Nagaosa N and Tokura Y 2018 Nature 564 95 [40] Zhao X, Wang L M, Zhang Y F, Han X M, Deveci M and Parmar M 2024 Artif. Intell. Rev. 57 99 [41] Alzubaidi L, Zhang J, Humaidi A J, Al-Dujaili A, Duan Y, Al-Shamma O, Santamaría J, Fadhel M A, Al-Amidie M and Farhan L 2021 J. Big Data 8 53 [42] Dosovitskiy A, Beyer L, Kolesnikov A,Weissenborn D, Zhai X H, Unterthiner T, Dehghani M, Minderer M, Heigold G, Gelly S, Uszkoreit J and Houlsby N 2010 ArXiv abs/2010.11929 [43] Maurício J, Domingues I and Bernardino J 2023 Appl. Sci. 13 5521 [44] Chicco D, Warrens M J and Jurman G 2021 PeerJ Comput. Sci. 7 e623 [45] Schmidhuber J 2015 Neural Networks 61 85 [46] Akhtar N and Ragavendran U 2020 Neural Comput. Appl. 32 879 [47] Lyu B Y, Zhao S H, Zhang Y B, Wang W W, Zheng F S, Dunin- Borkowski R E, Zang J D and Du H F 2024 Sci. China-Phys. Mech. Astron. 67 117511 [48] García-Palacios J L and Lázaro F J 1998 Phys. Rev. B 58 14937 |
| No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|