INTERDISCIPLINARY PHYSICS AND RELATED AREAS OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY |
Prev
Next
|
|
|
Unraveling the molecular mechanism of prion disease: Insights from α2 area mutations in human prion protein |
Rongri Tan(谈荣日)1,†, Kui Xia(夏奎)1, Damao Xun(寻大毛)1,‡, Wenjun Zong(宗文军)1, and Yousheng Yu(余幼胜)2 |
1 Department of Physics, Jiangxi Science and Technology Normal University, Nanchang 330013, China; 2 School of Science, East China University of Technology, Nanchang 330013, China |
|
|
Abstract Prion diseases are a class of fatal neurodegenerative diseases caused by misfolded prion proteins. The main reason is that pathogenic prion protein has a strong tendency to aggregate, which easily induces the damage to the central nervous system. Point mutations in the human prion protein gene can cause prion diseases such as Creutzfeldt-Jakob and Gerstmann's syndrome. To understand the mechanism of mutation-induced prion protein aggregation, the mutants in an aqueous solution are studied by molecular dynamics simulations, including the wild type, V180I, H187R and a double point mutation which is associated with CJD and GSS. After running simulations for 500 ns, the results show that these three mutations have different effects on the kinetic properties of PrP. The high fluctuations around the N-terminal residues of helix 2 in the V180I variant lead to a decrease in hydrogen bonding on helix 2, while an increase in the number of hydrogen bonds between the folded regions promotes the generation of β-sheet. Meanwhile, partial deletion of salt bridges in the H187R and double mutants allows the sub-structural domains of the prion protein to separate, which would accelerate the conversion from PrPC to PrPSc. A similar trend is observed in both SASA and Rg for all three mutations, indicating that the conformational space is reduced and the structure is compact.
|
Received: 16 September 2023
Revised: 19 October 2023
Accepted manuscript online: 02 November 2023
|
PACS:
|
87.10.Tf
|
(Molecular dynamics simulation)
|
|
31.15.at
|
(Molecule transport characteristics; molecular dynamics; electronic structure of polymers)
|
|
87.15.R-
|
(Reactions and kinetics)
|
|
87.15.kr
|
(Protein-solvent interactions)
|
|
Fund: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos.52073128, 12164002, and 11964012), the Foundation of Educational Committee of Jiangxi Province of China (Grant No.GJJ211112), and the Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars of Jiangxi Science & Technology Normal University (Grant No.2015QNBJRC002). |
Corresponding Authors:
Rongri Tan, Damao Xun
E-mail: rogertanr@hotmail.com
|
Cite this article:
Rongri Tan(谈荣日), Kui Xia(夏奎), Damao Xun(寻大毛), Wenjun Zong(宗文军), and Yousheng Yu(余幼胜) Unraveling the molecular mechanism of prion disease: Insights from α2 area mutations in human prion protein 2023 Chin. Phys. B 32 128703
|
[1] Yoshida S and Hasegawa T 2022 Neurochem. Int. 155 105307 [2] Brandel J P 2022 Rev. Med. Interne 43 106 [3] Lambert Z J, Greenlee J J and Cassmann E D 2021 Viruses 13 12 [4] Prusiner S B 1998 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95 13363 [5] Collinge J 2004 Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 24 519 [6] Palaniappan C, Narayanan R C and Sekar K 2021 ACS Chem. Neurosci. 12 2810 [7] Zhou S, Liu X, An X, Yao X and Liu H 2017 ACS Chem. Neurosci. 8 2446 [8] Singh R K, Chamachi N G and Chakrabarty S 2017 J. Phys. Chem. B 121 550 [9] Xu Z, Liu H, Wang S, Zhang Q, Yao X, Zhou S and Liu H 2020 ACS Chem. Neurosci. 11 772 [10] Guo J, Ning L, Ren H, Liu H and Yao X 2012 Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1820 116 [11] Rossetti G, Cong X, Caliandro R, Legname G and Carloni P 2011 J. Mol. Biol. 411 700 [12] Scheckel C and Aguzzi A 2018 Nat. Rev. Genet. 19 405 [13] Chakroun N, Fornili A, Prigent S, Kleinjung J, Dreiss C A, Rezaei H and Fraternali F 2013 J. Chem. Theory Comput. 9 2455 [14] Hadzi S, Ondracka A, Jerala R and Hafner-Bratkovic I 2015 FASEB J. 29 882 [15] Singh J, Kumar H, Sabareesan A T and Udgaonkar J B 2015 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136 16704 [16] Dima R I and Thirumalai D 2015 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101 15335 [17] Lu X, Wintrode P L and Surewicz W K 2007 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104 1510 [18] Cobb N J, Sonnichsen F D, McHaourab H and Surewicz W K 2007 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104 18946 [19] Kovacs G G, Trabattoni G, Hainfellner J A, Ironside J W, Knight R S and Budka H 2007 J. Neurol. 249 1567 [20] Hosszu L L, Wells M A, Jackson G S, Jones S, Batchelor M, Clarke A R, Craven C J, Waltho J P and Collinge J 2005 Biochemistry 44 16649 [21] Zahn R, Liu A, Luhrs T, Riek R, von Schroetter C, Lopez Garcia F, Billeter M, Calzolai L, Wider G and Wuthrich K 2000 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97 145 [22] Calzolai L and Zahn R 2003 J. Biol. Chem. 278 35592 [23] Deshpande N, Addess K J, Bluhm W F, Merino-Ott J C, TownsendMerino W, Zhang Q, Knezevich C, Xie L, Chen L, Feng Z, Green R K, Flippen Anderson J L, Westbrook J, Berman H M and Bourne P E 2005 Nucleic Acids Res. 33 D233 [24] Rose P W, Beran B, Bi C, et al. 2011 Nucleic Acids Res. 39 D392 [25] Jorgensen W L, Chandrasekhar J, Madura J D, Impey R W and Klein M L 1983 J. Chem. Phys. 79 926 [26] Van Der Spoel D, Lindahl E, Hess B, Groenhof G, Mark A E and Berendsen H J 2005 J. Comput. Chem. 26 1701 [27] Darden T, York D and Pedersen L 1993 J. Chem. Phys. 98 10089 [28] Humphrey W, Dalke A and Schulten K 1996 J. Mol. Graph. Model. 14 33 [29] Kabsch W and Sander C 1983 Biopolymers 22 2577 [30] Gao Y, Zhu T, Zhang C, Zhang Z H and Mei Y 2018 Chem. Phys. Lett. 706 594 [31] Gu W, Wang T, Zhu J, Shi Y and Liu H 2018 Biophys. Chem. 104 79 [32] Chong S H, Lee C, Kang G, Park M and Ham S 2011 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133 7075 [33] Guo J J, Ren H, Ning L L, Liu H X and Yao X J 2012 J. Struct. Biol. 178 225 [34] Adrover M, Pauwels K, Prigent S, Chiara C, Xu Z, Chapuis C, Pastore A and Rezaei H 2010 J. Biol. Chem. 285 21004 [35] Zhang J 2011 J. Theor. Biol. 269 88 [36] Lee S, Antony L, Hartmann R, Knaus K J, Surewicz K, Surewicz W K and Yee V C 2010 EMBO J. 29 251 [37] Chen W, van der Kamp M W and Daggett V 2014 Biophys. J. 106 1152 [38] Cobb N J and Surewicz W K 2009 Biochemistry 48 2574 [39] Knaus K J, Morillas M, Swietnicki W, Malone M, Surewicz W K and Yee V C 2001 Nat. Struct. Biol. 8 770 [40] Bjorndahl T C, Zhou G P, Liu X, Perez-Pineiro R, Semenchenko V, Saleem F, Acharya S, Bujold A, Sobsey C A and Wishart D S 2011 Biochemistry 50 1162 |
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|