| PHYSICS OF GASES, PLASMAS, AND ELECTRIC DISCHARGES |
Prev
Next
|
|
|
Effect of kinetic ions on the toroidal double-tearing modes |
| Ruibo Zhang(张睿博)1,2, Lei Ye(叶磊)1,†, Yang Chen3, Nong Xiang(项农)1, and Xiaoqing Yang(杨小庆)1 |
1 Hefei Institutes of Physical Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei 230031, China;
2 University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China;
3 Center for Integrated Plasma Studies, University of Colorado at Boulder, Boulder, Colorado 80309, USA |
|
|
|
|
Abstract We investigate the effects of kinetic ions on double-tearing modes (DTMs) using the gyrokinetic particle-in-cell simulation code GEM with a gyrokinetic ion/fluid electron hybrid model. It is found that the ion kinetic effects can decrease the growth rate of the DTMs. This effect is more significant for stronger coupling of DTMs with smaller distance between the rational surfaces. Kinetic ions can also enhance the coupling effect between the two rational surfaces. Energy transfer analyses between particles and wave fields show that the stabilizing effect of kinetic ions comes mainly from the perpendicular magnetic drift of ions in the coupling region and around the outer rational surface.
|
Received: 07 April 2022
Revised: 27 June 2022
Accepted manuscript online: 08 July 2022
|
|
PACS:
|
52.35.Py
|
(Macroinstabilities (hydromagnetic, e.g., kink, fire-hose, mirror, ballooning, tearing, trapped-particle, flute, Rayleigh-Taylor, etc.))
|
| |
52.65.Tt
|
(Gyrofluid and gyrokinetic simulations)
|
| |
52.35.Mw
|
(Nonlinear phenomena: waves, wave propagation, and other interactions (including parametric effects, mode coupling, ponderomotive effects, etc.))
|
|
| Fund: This work was supported by the National MCF Energy R&D Program of China (Grant No. 2019YFE03060001), the National Key R&D Program of China (Grant No. 2017YFE0300406), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 11975272 and 11905257). Y. Chen is supported by the SciDAC Center Advanced Tokamak Modeling Environment (AToM) (Grant No. DE-SC0017992). The numerical calculations in this work were performed on the ShenMa High Performance Computing Cluster in Institute of Plasma Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, and resources of the National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center (NERSC), which are supported by the Office of Science of the U.S. Department of Energy (Grant No. DEAC02-05CH11231). |
Corresponding Authors:
Lei Ye
E-mail: lye@ipp.ac.cn
|
Cite this article:
Ruibo Zhang(张睿博), Lei Ye(叶磊), Yang Chen, Nong Xiang(项农), and Xiaoqing Yang(杨小庆) Effect of kinetic ions on the toroidal double-tearing modes 2023 Chin. Phys. B 32 025203
|
[1] Pritchett P, Lee Y and Drake J 1980 Phys. Fluids 23 1368
[2] Furth H, Rutherford P and Selberg H 1973 Phys. Fluids 16 1054
[3] Chang Z, Park W, Fredrickson E, Batha S, Bell M, Bell R, Budny R, Bush C, Janos A, Levinton F, et al. 1996 Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 3553
[4] Liu D, Zhang W, McClenaghan J, Wang J and Lin Z 2014 Phys. Plasmas 21 122520
[5] Zhang R, Chen Y, Ye L and Xiang N 2022 Phys. Plasmas 29 012108
[6] Wang J, Zheng-Xiong W, Lai W and Yue L 2017 Nucl. Fusion 57 046007
[7] Ishii Y, Smolyakov A and Takechi M 2009 Nucl. Fusion 49 085006
[8] Zhang R, Lu X, Huang Q, Dong J and Gong X 2016 Phys. Plasmas 23 122509
[9] Wang Z X, Wei L, Wang X and Liu Y 2011 Phys. Plasmas 18 050701
[10] Wang X Q, Wang X, Xu W B and Wang Z X 2011 Phys. Plasmas 18 012102
[11] Zhang W, Ma Z and Wang S 2017 Phys. Plasmas 24 102510
[12] Ye C, Wang Z X, Wei L and Hu Z Q 2019 Nucl. Fusion 59 096044
[13] Sun G, Dong C and Duan L 2015 Phys. Plasmas 22 092509
[14] Liu T, Wang Z X, Wang J and Wei L 2018 Nucl. Fusion 58 076026
[15] Hazeltine R, Dobrott D and Wang T 1975 Phys. Fluids 18 1778
[16] Drake J and Lee Y 1977 Phys. Fluids 20 1341
[17] Cai H and Fu G 2012 Phys. Plasmas 19 072506
[18] Rogers B, Kobayashi S, Ricci P, Dorland W, Drake J and Tatsuno T 2007 Phys. Plasmas 14 092110
[19] Liu Y, Hastie R and Hender T 2012 Phys. Plasmas 19 092510
[20] Hornsby W, Migliano P, Buchholz R, Kroenert L, Weikl A, Peeters A, Zarzoso D, Poli E and Casson F 2015 Phys. Plasmas 22 022118
[21] Wang X Q and Wang X G 2016 Nucl. Fusion 57 016039
[22] Gao B, Cai H, Wang F, Gao X and Wan Y 2021 Phys. Plasmas 28 012104
[23] Yao Y, Lin Z, Dong J, Shi P, Liu S and Li J 2021 Phys. Lett. A 417 127681
[24] Toi K, Takechi M, Takagi S, et al. 1999 Nucl. Fusion 39 1929
[25] Shi P, Chen W, Wang Z, et al. 2021 Nucl. Fusion 61 096025
[26] Chen Y and Parker S E 2007 J. Comput. Phys. 220 839
[27] Chen Y and Parker S 2001 Phys. Plasmas 8 441
[28] Chen Y and Parker S 2003 J. Comput. Phys. 189 463
[29] Snyder P and Hammett G 2001 Phys. Plasmas 8 3199
[30] Günter S, Schade S, Maraschek M, Pinches S, Strumberger E, Wolf R, Yu Q and Team A U 2000 Nucl. Fusion 40 1541
[31] Chen Y, Chowdhury J, Parker S and Wan W 2015 Phys. Plasmas 22 042111 |
| No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|
