| INTERDISCIPLINARY PHYSICS AND RELATED AREAS OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY |
Prev
Next
|
|
|
Water adsorption performance of UiO-66 modified by MgCl2 for heat transformation applications |
| Jia-Li Liu(刘佳丽)1, Guo-Dong Fu(付国栋)1, Ping Wu(吴平)1,†, Shang Liu(刘尚)1, Jin-Guang Yang(杨金光)1, Shi-Ping Zhang(张师平)1, Li Wang(王立)2, Min Xu(许闽)3, and Xiu-Lan Huai(淮秀兰)3 |
1 Beijing Key Laboratory for Magneto-Photoelectrical Composite and Interface Science, School of Mathematics and Physics, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China;
2 School of Energy and Environmental Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China;
3 Institute of Engineering Thermophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract UiO-66 is a potential material for adsorption heat transformation (AHT) with high specific surface area, and excellent thermal and chemical stability. However, the low water adsorption capacity of UiO-66 in the low relative pressure range ($0< P/P_0< 0.3$) limits its application in AHT. We prepare the UiO-66 modified by MgCl$_{2 }$ through using the solvothermal method and impregnation method, and study their water vapor adsorption performances and heat storage capacities. Attributed to the extremely high saturated water uptake and excellent hydrophilicity of MgCl$_{2}$, the water adsorption performance of UiO-66 is improved, although the introduction of MgCl$_{2}$ reduces its specific surface area and pore volume. The water adsorption capacity at $P/P_0=0.3$ and the saturated water adsorption capacity of the UiO-66 (with MgCl$_{2}$ content of 0.57 wt%) modified by the solvothermal method are 0.27 g/g and 0.57 g/g at 298 K, respectively, which are 68.8% and 32.6% higher than the counterparts of pure UiO-66, respectively. Comparing with pure UiO-66, the water adsorption capacity of the UiO-66 (with MgCl$_{2}$ content of 1.02 wt%) modified by the impregnation method is increased by 56.3% and 14.0% at the same pressure, respectively. During 20 water adsorption/desorption cycles, the above two materials show high heat storage densities ($\sim1293 $ J/g and 1378 J/g). Therein, the UiO-66 modified by the solvothermal method exhibits the excellent cyclic stability. These results suggest that the introduction of an appropriate amount of MgCl$_{2}$ makes UiO-66 more suitable for AHT applications.
|
Received: 01 April 2022
Revised: 19 June 2022
Accepted manuscript online: 22 June 2022
|
|
PACS:
|
81.05.Rm
|
(Porous materials; granular materials)
|
| |
81.05.-t
|
(Specific materials: fabrication, treatment, testing, and analysis)
|
| |
88.80.-q
|
(Energy delivery and storage)
|
| |
88.05.Sv
|
(Energy use in heating and cooling of residential and commercial buildings)
|
|
| Fund: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51836009). |
Corresponding Authors:
Ping Wu
E-mail: pingwu@sas.ustb.edu.cn
|
Cite this article:
Jia-Li Liu(刘佳丽), Guo-Dong Fu(付国栋), Ping Wu(吴平), Shang Liu(刘尚), Jin-Guang Yang(杨金光), Shi-Ping Zhang(张师平), Li Wang(王立), Min Xu(许闽), and Xiu-Lan Huai(淮秀兰) Water adsorption performance of UiO-66 modified by MgCl2 for heat transformation applications 2022 Chin. Phys. B 31 118101
|
[1] Wongsuwan W, Kumar S, Neveu P and Meunier F 2001 Appl. Therm. Eng. 21 1489
[2] Wu W, Zhang X L, Li X T, Shi W X and Wang B L 2012 Appl. Therm. Eng. 48 349
[3] Freni A, Maggio G, Sapienza A, Frazzica A, Restuccia G and Vasta S 2016 Appl. Therm. Eng. 104 85
[4] Jeremias F, Fröhlich D, Janiak C and Henninger S K 2014 New J. Chem. 38 1846
[5] Ng K C, Chua H T, Chung C Y, Loke C H, Kashiwagi T, Akisawa A and Saha B B 2001 Appl. Therm. Eng. 21 1631
[6] Kawano T, Kubota M, Onyango M S, Watanabe F and Matsuda H 2008 Appl. Therm. Eng. 28 865
[7] Kubota M, Ito T, Watanabe F and Matsuda H 2011 Appl. Therm. Eng. 31 1495
[8] Myat A, Kim Choon N, Thu K and Kim Y D 2013 Appl. Energy 102 582
[9] Risti? A, Logar N Z, Henninger S K and Kau?i? V 2012 Adv. Funct. Mater. 22 1952
[10] Varlec J, Krajnc A, Mazaj M, Risti? A, Vanatalu K, Oss A, Samoson A, Kau?i? V and Mali G 2016 New J. Chem. 40 4178
[11] An H J, Sarker M, Yoo D K and Jhung S H 2019 Chem. Eng. J. 373 1064
[12] Han B and Chakraborty A 2020 Energy Convers. Manage. 213 112825
[13] Wang Q, Tang S L, Tian S, Wei X J and Peng T F 2019 J. Nanomater. 2019 1
[14] Liu S, Wu P, Zhang S P, Fu G D, Yan D, Han X L, Huai X L and Xu M 2021 Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 647 1
[15] Farha O K, Eryazici I, Jeong N C, Hauser B G, Wilmer C E, Sarjeant A A, Snurr R Q, Nguyen S T, Yazaydin A O and Hupp J T 2012 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134 15016
[16] Saha D and Deng S 2010 Tsinghua Science and Technology 15 363
[17] Kim M, Cahill J F, Su Y, Prather K A and Cohen S M 2012 Chem. Sci. 3 126
[18] Yang Q, Wiersum A D, Llewellyn P L, Guillerm V, Serre C and Maurin G 2011 Chem. Commun. (Camb) 47 9603
[19] Cavka J H, Jakobsen S, Olsbye U, Guillou N, Lamberti C, Bordiga S and Lillerud K P 2008 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130 13850
[20] Henninger S K, Jeremias F, Kummer H and Janiak C 2011 Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2012 2625
[21] Zheng X, Ma Q L, Tan J M and Yu B 2021 Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 60 4727
[22] Makhanya N, Oboirien B, Ren J W, Musyoka N and Sciacovelli A 2021 J. Energy Storage 34 102179
[23] Cmarik G E, Kim M, Cohen S M and Walton K S 2012 Langmuir 28 15606
[24] Fu G D, Wu P, Yang J G, Zhang S P and Huai X L 2022 Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 331 111642
[25] Lau C H, Babarao R and Hill M R 2013 Chem. Commun. (Camb) 49 3634
[26] Ebrahim A M and Bandosz T J 2013 ACS Appl. Mater. Inter. 5 10565
[27] Garzón-Tovar L, Pérez-Carvajal J, Imaz I and Maspoch D 2017 Adv. Funct. Mater. 27 1606424
[28] Sun Y Y, Spie? A, Jansen C, Nuhnen A, Gökpinar S, Wiedey R, Ernst S J and Janiak C 2020 J. Mater. Chem. A 8 13364
[29] Donkers P A J, Sögütoglu L C, Huinink H P, Fischer H R and Adan O C G 2017 Appl. Energy 199 45
[30] Whiting G T, Grondin D, Stosic D, Bennici S and Auroux A 2014 Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 128 289
[31] Shearer G C, Chavan S, Ethiraj J, Vitillo J G, Svelle S, Olsbye U, Lamberti C, Bordiga S and Lillerud K P 2014 Chem. Mater. 26 4068
[32] Hoa L T, Nhi L T T, Son L V T, Linh N L M, Hai H V M and Khieu D Q 2021 J. Nanomater. 2021 1
[33] Cao Y, Zhao Y X, Lv Z J, Song F J and Zhong Q 2015 J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 27 102
[34] Han Y T, Liu M, Li K Y, Sun Q, Zhang W S, Song C S, Zhang G L, Conrad Zhang Z and Guo X W 2017 Inorg. Chem. Front. 4 1870
[35] Huang Q Z, Lu G M, Wang J and Yu J G 2011 J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 91 159
[36] Thommes M, Kaneko K, Neimark A V, Olivier J P, Rodriguez-Reinoso F, Rouquerol J and Sing K S W 2015 Pure Appl. Chem. 87 1051
[37] Jeremias F, Khutia A, Henninger S K and Janiak C 2012 J. Mater. Chem. 22 10148
[38] Küsgens P, Zgaverdea A, Fritz H G, Siegle S and Kaskel S 2010 J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 93 2476
[39] Canivet J, Bonnefoy J, Daniel C, Legrand A, Coasne B and Farrusseng D 2014 New J. Chem. 38 3102
[40] Glaznev I, Ponomarenko I, Kirik S and Aristov Y 2011 Int. J. Refrig. 34 1244
[41] Ait Ousaleh H, Sair S, Mansouri S, Abboud Y, Faik A and El Bouari A 2020 Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 215 110601 |
| No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|
