|
|
|
Dependence of photoelectron-momentum distribution of H2+ molecule on orientation angle and laser ellipticity |
| Hong-Dan Zhang(张宏丹)1, Si-Qi Zhang(张思琪)1, Lei Ji(纪磊)2, Qi Zhen(甄琪)1, Jing Guo(郭静)1, Xue-Shen Liu(刘学深)1 |
1 Institute of Atomic and Molecular Physics, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, China;
2 School of Physics and Electronic Technology, Liaoning Normal University, Dalian 116029, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract By numerically solving the two-dimensional time-dependent Schrödinger equation under the frozen-nuclei approximation, we are able to study the molecular photoelectron-momentum distribution (MPMD) of H2+ with different orientation angles driven by elliptically polarized laser pulse with varying ellipticities. Our numerical results show that the MPMD is sensitive to the orientation angle and the laser ellipticity, which can be explained by the attosecond perturbation ionization theory and the exactly solvable photoionization model. When the ellipticity ε=0, the final MPMD of x-oriented H2+ shows a distinct six-lobe pattern that is different from that with ε=0.5 and ε=1. The evolutions of electron wave packet (EWP) and MPMD with x-oriented H2+ are presented to interpret this distinct pattern.
|
Received: 15 February 2019
Revised: 07 March 2019
Accepted manuscript online:
|
|
PACS:
|
32.80.Rm
|
(Multiphoton ionization and excitation to highly excited states)
|
| |
32.80.Fb
|
(Photoionization of atoms and ions)
|
| |
42.65.Re
|
(Ultrafast processes; optical pulse generation and pulse compression)
|
|
| Fund: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 11271158, 11574117, and 61575077) and the Natural Science Foundation of Jilin Province of China (Grants No. 20180101225JC). |
Corresponding Authors:
Jing Guo, Xue-Shen Liu
E-mail: gjing@jlu.edu.cn;liuxs@jlu.edu.cn
|
Cite this article:
Hong-Dan Zhang(张宏丹), Si-Qi Zhang(张思琪), Lei Ji(纪磊), Qi Zhen(甄琪), Jing Guo(郭静), Xue-Shen Liu(刘学深) Dependence of photoelectron-momentum distribution of H2+ molecule on orientation angle and laser ellipticity 2019 Chin. Phys. B 28 053201
|
| [1] |
Hentschel M, Kienberger R, Spielmann Ch, Reider G A, Milosevic N, Corkum P B, Heinzmann U, Drescher M and Krausz F 2001 Nature 414 509
|
| [2] |
Krausz F and Ivanov M 2009 Rev. Mod. Phys. 81 163
|
| [3] |
Goulielmakis E, Loh Z H, Wirth A, Santra R, Rohringer N, Yakovlev V S, Zherebtsov S, Pfeifer T, Azzeer A M, Kling M F, Leone S R and Krausz F 2010 Nature 466 739
|
| [4] |
Haessler S, Caillat J, Giovanetti-Teixeira C, Ruchon T, Auguste T, Diveki Z, Breger P, Maquet A, Carr'e B, Taïeb R and Saliéres P 2010 Nat. Phys. 6 200
|
| [5] |
Xiao X R, Wang M X, Li M, Geng J W, Liu Y Q and Peng L Y 2016 Acta Phys. Sin. 65 220203 (in Chinese)
|
| [6] |
Jia Y W, Guo Q L, Li P C, Wang G L and Zhou X X 2016 Acta Phys. Sin. 65 223205 (in Chinese)
|
| [7] |
Zhang H D, Guo J, Shi Y, Du H, Liu H F, Huang X R, Liu X S and Jing J 2017 Chin. Phys. Lett. 34 014206
|
| [8] |
Gaumnitz T, Jain A, Pertot Y, Huppert M, Jordan I, Ardana-Lamas F and Wörner H J 2017 Opt. Express 25 27506
|
| [9] |
Vrakking M J J 2014 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 16 2775
|
| [10] |
Wang H, Chini M, Chen S, Zhang C, He F, Cheng Y, Wu Y, Thumm U and Chang Z 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 143002
|
| [11] |
Neidel Ch, Klei J, Yang C H, Rouzée A, Vrakking M J J, Klünder K, Miranda M, Arnold C L, Fordell T, L'Huillier A, Gisselbrecht M, Johnsson P, Dinh M P, Suraud E, Reinhard P G, Despré V, Marques M A L and Lépine F 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 033001
|
| [12] |
Deng Y P and Xie X H 2015 Phys. Rev. A 91 043414
|
| [13] |
Zhang J, Ge X L, Wang T, Xu T T, Guo J and Liu X S 2015 Phys. Rev. A 92 013418
|
| [14] |
Pan X F, Zhang J, Luo X Y, Zhang H D, Xu T T and Liu X S 2018 Laser Phys. 28 075301
|
| [15] |
Yuan K J and Bandrauk A D 2018 Phys. Rev. A 97 023408
|
| [16] |
Miller M R, Jaroń-Becker A and Becker A 2016 Phys. Rev. A 93 013406
|
| [17] |
Picón A, Bahabad A, Kapteyn H C, Murnane M M and Becker A 2011 Phys. Rev. A 83 013414
|
| [18] |
Yuan K J, Bian X B and Bandrauk A D 2014 Phys. Rev. A 90 023407
|
| [19] |
Xu T Y and He F 2014 Phys. Rev. A 90 053401
|
| [20] |
Jiang S C, Yu C, Yuan G L, Wu T and Lu R F 2017 Sci. Rep. 7 42086
|
| [21] |
Zuo T, Bandrauk A D and Corkum P B 1996 Chem. Phys. Lett. 259 313
|
| [22] |
Guan X X, DuToit R C and Bartschat K 2013 Phys. Rev. A 87 053410
|
| [23] |
Yuan K J, Chelkowski S and Bandrauk A D 2015 Chem. Phys. Lett. 638 173
|
| [24] |
Murakami M and Chu S I 2016 Phys. Rev. A 94 043425
|
| [25] |
Yuan K J and Bandrauk A D 2012 Phys. Rev. A 85 013413
|
| [26] |
Yuan K J and Bandrauk A D 2012 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 45 105601
|
| [27] |
Odenweller M, Takemoto N, Vredenborg A, Cole K, Pahl K, Titze J, Schmidt L P H, Jahnke T, Dörner R and Becker A 2011 Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 143004
|
| [28] |
Yuan K J, Chelkowski S and Bandrauk A D 2016 Phys. Rev. A 93 053425
|
| [29] |
Zhang H D, Ben S, Xu T T, Song K L, Tian Y R, Xu Q Y, Zhang S Q, Guo J and Liu X S 2018 Phys. Rev. A 98 013422
|
| [30] |
Guan X, Secor E B, Bartschat K and Schneider B I 2011 Phys. Rev. A 84 033420
|
| [31] |
Qin B Y, Wang P J and He F 2015 Chin. Phys. B 24 114208
|
| [32] |
Zhu X S, Zhang Q B, Lan P F and Lu P X 2016 Acta Phys. Sin. 65 224207 (in Chinese)
|
| [33] |
Feit M D, Fleck J A Jr. and Steiger A 1982 J. Comput. Phys. 47 412
|
| [34] |
He P L, Takemoto N and He F 2015 Phys. Rev. A 91 063413
|
| [35] |
Yuan K J, Chelkowski S and Bandrauk A D 2014 Chem. Phys. Lett. 592 334
|
| [36] |
Doblhoff-Dier K, Dimitriou K I, Staudte A and Gräfe S 2013 Phys. Rev. A 88 033411
|
| [37] |
Abu-samha M and Madsen L B 2016 Phys. Rev. A 94 023414
|
| [38] |
Pronin E A, Starace A F, Frolov M V and Manakov N L 2009 Phys. Rev. A 80 063403
|
| [39] |
Pronin E A, Starace A F and Peng L Y 2011 Phys. Rev. A 84 013417
|
| [40] |
Yuan K J and Bandrauk A D 2015 Struct. Dynam. 2 014101
|
| No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|
