CONDENSED MATTER: ELECTRONIC STRUCTURE, ELECTRICAL, MAGNETIC, AND OPTICAL PROPERTIES |
Prev
Next
|
|
|
Different angle-resolved polarization configurations of Raman spectroscopy: A case on the basal and edge plane of two-dimensional materials |
Xue-Lu Liu(刘雪璐)1,2, Xin Zhang(张昕)1,2, Miao-Ling Lin(林妙玲)1,2, Ping-Heng Tan(谭平恒)1,2 |
1 State Key Laboratory for Superlattices and Microstructures, Institute of Semiconductors, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100083, China;
2 College of Materials Science and Opto-Electronic Technology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 101408, China |
|
|
Abstract Angle-resolved polarized Raman (ARPR) spectroscopy can be utilized to assign the Raman modes based on crystal symmetry and Raman selection rules and also to characterize the crystallographic orientation of anisotropic materials. However, polarized Raman measurements can be implemented by several different configurations and thus lead to different results. In this work, we systematically analyze three typical polarization configurations:1) to change the polarization of the incident laser, 2) to rotate the sample, and 3) to set a half-wave plate in the common optical path of incident laser and scattered Raman signal to simultaneously vary their polarization directions. We provide a general approach of polarization analysis on the Raman intensity under the three polarization configurations and demonstrate that the latter two cases are equivalent to each other. Because the basal plane of highly ordered pyrolytic graphite (HOPG) exhibits isotropic feature and its edge plane is highly anisotropic, HOPG can be treated as a modelling system to study ARPR spectroscopy of two-dimensional materials on their basal and edge planes. Therefore, we verify the ARPR behaviors of HOPG on its basal and edge planes at three different polarization configurations. The orientation direction of HOPG edge plane can be accurately determined by the angle-resolved polarization-dependent G mode intensity without rotating sample, which shows potential application for orientation determination of other anisotropic and vertically standing two-dimensional materials and other materials.
|
Received: 02 March 2017
Revised: 07 April 2017
Accepted manuscript online:
|
PACS:
|
78.30.-j
|
(Infrared and Raman spectra)
|
|
78.67.Wj
|
(Optical properties of graphene)
|
|
63.22.Rc
|
(Phonons in graphene)
|
|
Fund: Project supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2016YFA0301204) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 11604326, 11434010, 11474277, and 11225421). |
Corresponding Authors:
Ping-Heng Tan
E-mail: phtan@semi.ac.cn
|
Cite this article:
Xue-Lu Liu(刘雪璐), Xin Zhang(张昕), Miao-Ling Lin(林妙玲), Ping-Heng Tan(谭平恒) Different angle-resolved polarization configurations of Raman spectroscopy: A case on the basal and edge plane of two-dimensional materials 2017 Chin. Phys. B 26 067802
|
[1] |
Zhang X, Tan Q H, Wu J B, Shi W and Tan P H 2016 Nanoscale 8 6435
|
[2] |
Li X L, Han W P, Wu J B, Qiao X F, Zhang J and Tan P H 2017 Adv. Funct. Mater. 1604468
|
[3] |
Wu J B, Zhang X, Ijäs M, Han W P, Qiao X F, Li X L, Jiang D S, Ferrari A C and Tan P H 2014 Nat. Commun. 5 5309
|
[4] |
Lui C H, Ye Z, Keiser C, Barros E B and He R 2015 Appl. Phys. Lett. 106 041904
|
[5] |
Zhang X, Han W P, Qiao X F, Tan Q H, Wang Y F, Zhang J and Tan P H 2016 Carbon 99 118
|
[6] |
Zhao W J, Tan P H, Zhang J and Liu J 2010 Phys. Rev. B 23 245423
|
[7] |
Tan P H, Han W P, Zhao W J, Wu Z H, Chang K, Wang H, Wang Y F, Bonini N, Marzari N, Pugno N and Savini G 2012 Nat. Mater. 11 294
|
[8] |
Zhang X, Han W P, Wu J B, Milana S, Lu Y, Li Q Q, Ferrari A C and Tan P H 2013 Phys. Rev. B 87 115413
|
[9] |
Ji J T, Zhang A M, Yang R, Tian Y, Jin F, Qiu X G and Zhang Q M 2016 Chin. Phys. B 25 067803
|
[10] |
Wei G N, Tan Q H, Dai X, Feng Q, Luo W G, Sheng Y, Wang K, Pan W W, Zhang L Y, Wang S M and Wang K Y 2016 Chin. Phys. B 25 066301
|
[11] |
Duesberg G S, Loa I, Burghard M, Syassen K and Roth S 2000 Phys. Rev. Lett. 85 5436
|
[12] |
Rao A M, Jorio A, Pimenta M A, Dantas M S, Saito R, Dresselhaus G and Dresselhaus M S 2000 Phys. Rev. Lett. 84 1820
|
[13] |
Zhao H, Wu J B, Zhong H X, Guo Q S, Wang X M, Xia F N, Yang L, Tan P H and Wang H 2015 Nano Res. 8 3651
|
[14] |
Qiao X F, Wu J B, Zhou L, Qiao J, Shi W, Chen T, Zhang X, Zhang J, Ji W and Tan P H 2016 Nanoscale 88324
|
[15] |
Kim J, Lee J U, Lee J, Park H J, Lee Z, Lee C and Cheong H 2015 Nanoscale 7 18708
|
[16] |
Huang M, Yan H, Chen C, Song D, Heinz T F and Hone J 2009 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 106 7304
|
[17] |
Wang Y L, Cong C X, Qiu C Y and Yu T 2013 Small 9 2857
|
[18] |
Kong D S, Wang H T, Cha J J, Pasta M, Koski K J, Yao J and Cui Y 2013 Nano Lett. 13 1341
|
[19] |
Yu J H, Lee H R, Hong S S, Kong D, Lee H W, Wang H, Xiong F, Wang S and Cui Y 2015 Nano Lett. 15 1031
|
[20] |
Cho S Y, Kim S J, Lee Y, Kim J S, Jung W B, Yoo H W, Kim J and Jung H T 2015 ACS Nano 9 9314
|
[21] |
Zhai P F, Liu J, Zeng J, Duan J L, Xu L J, Yao H J, Guo H, Zhang S X, Hou M D and Sun Y M 2016 Carbon 101 22
|
[22] |
Dai Z H, Wang Y L, Liu L Q, Liu X L, Tan P H, Xu Z P, Kuang J, Liu Q, Lou J and Zhang Z 2016 Adv. Funct. Mater. 26 7003
|
[23] |
Ribeiro H B, Pimenta M A, de Matos C J, Moreira R L, Rodin A S, Zapata J D, de Souza E A and Castro Neto A H 2015 ACS Nano 9 4270
|
[24] |
Yoon D, Moon H, Son Y W, Samsonidze G, Park B H, Kim J B, Lee Y and Cheong H 2008 Nano Lett. 8 4270
|
[25] |
Loudon R 2001 Adv. Phys. 50 813
|
[26] |
Jones R C 1941 J. Opt. Soc. Am. 31 488
|
[27] |
Mani K K and Ramani R 1974 Phys. Status Solidi B 61 659
|
[28] |
Tan P H, Wu J B, Han W P, Zhao W J, Zhang X, Wang H and Wang Y F 2014 Phys. Rev. B 89 235404
|
[29] |
Ping J L and Fuhrer M S 2014 J. Appl. Phys. 116 044303
|
[30] |
Tan P H, Deng Y M, Zhao Q and Cheng W C 1999 Appl. Phys. Lett. 74 1818
|
[31] |
Tan P H, Deng Y M and Zhao Q 1998 Phys. Rev. B 58 5435
|
[32] |
Kawashima Y, Katagiri G 1995 Phys. Rev. B 52 10053
|
[33] |
Tan P H, An L, Liu L Q, Guo Z X, Czerw R, Carroll D L, Ajayan P M, Zhang N and Guo H L 2002 Phys. Rev. B 66 245410
|
[34] |
Ferrari A C and Basko D M 2013 Nat. Nanotech. 8 235
|
[35] |
Jorio A, Souza Filho A G, Brar V W, Swan A K, Unlu M S, Goldberg B B, Righi A, Hafner J H, Lieber C M, Saito R and Dresselhaus G 2002 Phys. Rev. B 65 121402
|
[36] |
Liang Q Z, Yao X X, Wang W, Liu Y and Wong C P 2011 ACS Nano 5 2392
|
[37] |
Fu X L, Qian J W, Qiao X F, Tan P H and Peng Z J 2014 Opt. Lett. 39 6450
|
[38] |
Wu J X, Mao N N, Xie L M, Xu H and Zhang J 2015 Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54 2366
|
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|