ELECTROMAGNETISM, OPTICS, ACOUSTICS, HEAT TRANSFER, CLASSICAL MECHANICS, AND FLUID DYNAMICS |
Prev
Next
|
|
|
Noninvasive treatment efficacy monitoring and dose control for high-intensity focused ultrasound therapy using relative electrical impedance variation |
Huidan Su(宿慧丹)1, Gepu Guo(郭各朴)1, Qingyu Ma(马青玉)1, Juan Tu(屠娟)2, Dong Zhang(章东)2 |
1 Key Laboratory of Optoelectronics of Jiangsu Province, School of Physics and Technology, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210023, China;
2 Laboratory of Modern Acoustics of Ministry of Education, Institute of Acoustics, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China |
|
|
Abstract As an effective therapeutic modality, high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) can destroy tumour tissues by thermocoagulation with less metastasis, but it is still limited by inaccurate non-invasive temperature monitoring and efficacy evaluation. A model of electrical impedance measurement during HIFU therapy was established using the temperature-impedance relationship. Based on the simulations of acoustic pressure, temperature, and electrical conductivity, the impedance of the phantom was calculated and experimentally demonstrated for different values of acoustic power values and treatment time. We proved that the relative impedance variation (RIV) increases linearly with the increasing treatment time at a fixed acoustic power, and the relative impedance variation rate shows a linear relationship with the acoustic power. The RIV and treatment time required for HIFU treatment efficacy are inversely proportional to the acoustic power and the square of acoustic power, respectively. The favourable results suggest that RIV can be used as an efficient indicator for noninvasive temperature monitoring and efficacy evaluation and may provide new strategy for accurate dose control of HIFU therapy.
|
Received: 31 October 2016
Revised: 13 January 2017
Accepted manuscript online:
|
PACS:
|
43.35.+d
|
(Ultrasonics, quantum acoustics, and physical effects of sound)
|
|
87.50.Y-
|
(Biological effects of acoustic and ultrasonic energy)
|
|
87.50.yk
|
(Dosimetry/exposure assessment)
|
|
87.55.N-
|
(Radiation monitoring, control, and safety)
|
|
Fund: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 11604156 and 11474166), the Science and Technology Cooperation Projects of China and Romania (Grant No. 42-23), the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province, China (Grant No. BK20161013), the Postdoctoral Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 2016M591874), and the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions, China. |
Corresponding Authors:
Dong Zhang
E-mail: maqingyu@njnu.edu.cn
|
Cite this article:
Huidan Su(宿慧丹), Gepu Guo(郭各朴), Qingyu Ma(马青玉), Juan Tu(屠娟), Dong Zhang(章东) Noninvasive treatment efficacy monitoring and dose control for high-intensity focused ultrasound therapy using relative electrical impedance variation 2017 Chin. Phys. B 26 054302
|
[1] |
Hutchinson L 2011 Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 8 385
|
[2] |
Tu J, Hwang J H, Chen T, Fan T, Guo X, Crum L A and Zhang D 2012 Appl. Phys. Lett. 101 124102
|
[3] |
Zhang C, Teng F, Tu J and Zhang D 2014 PLOS ONE 9 e113673
|
[4] |
Gavrilov L R 2013 J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 133 4348
|
[5] |
Wu F 2013 J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 134 1695
|
[6] |
Wang X, Lin J, Liu X, Liu J and Gong X 2016 Chin. Phys. B 25 186
|
[7] |
Xing X, Lu X, Pus E C and Zhong P 2008 Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 375 645
|
[8] |
Smet M D, Heijman E, Langereis S, Hijnen N M and Grüll H 2011 J. Control. Release 150 102
|
[9] |
Jeanmonod D, Werner B, Morel A, Michels L, Zadicario E, Schiff G and Martin E 2012 Neurosurgical Focus 32 107
|
[10] |
Khokhlova T D, Bailey M R, Canney M S, Khokhiova V A, Lee D and Marro K I 2009 J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 125 2420
|
[11] |
Ye G, Smith P P and Noble J A 2010 Ultrasound Med. Biol. 36 234
|
[12] |
Daniels M J, Varghese T, Madsen E Land Zagzebski J A 2007 Phys. Med. Biol. 52 4827
|
[13] |
Kaczkowski P J and Anand A 2005 J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 118 1882
|
[14] |
Parker K J and Chen S 2013 Proc. Mtgs. Acoust. 19 075102
|
[15] |
Ghoshal G, Kemmerer, J, Karunakaran C, Abuhabsah R, Miller R, Sarwate S and Oelze M 2014 Ultrason. Imaging. 36 239
|
[16] |
Gabriel C, Penman A and Grant E H 2009 Phys. Med. Biol. 54 4863
|
[17] |
Griffiths H and Ahmed A 1987 Clin. Phys. Physiol. Meas. 8 147
|
[18] |
Zurbuchen U, Holmer C, Lehmann K S, Stein T, Roggan A, Seifarth C, Buhr H J and Ritz J P 2010 Int. J. Hyperthermia 26 26
|
[19] |
Cai H, You F, Shi X, Fu F, Liu R, Tang C and Dong X 2010 Chin. Med. Equip. J. 11 8
|
[20] |
Lundin S and Stenqvist O 2012 Curr. Opin. Crit. Care 18 35
|
[21] |
Leonhardt S and Lachmann B 2012 Intensive Care Med. 38 1917
|
[22] |
Tong I O, Kim H B, Jeong W C, Sajib S Z K, Kyung E J, Kim H J, Kwon O I and Woo E J 2015 Appl. Phys. Lett. 107 023701
|
[23] |
Blackstock D T 2000 Fundamentals of Physical Acoustics (New York: John Wiley & Sons. Inc.)
|
[24] |
Cheng J C 2012 Fundamentals of Acoustics (Beijing: Science Express)
|
[25] |
Bailey M R, Khokhlova V A, Sapozhnikov O A, Kargl S G and Crum L A 2003 Acoust. Phys. 49 369
|
[26] |
Pennes H H 1948 J. Appl. Physiol. 1 93
|
[27] |
Sapareto S A and Dewey W C 1984 Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 10 787
|
[28] |
Meaney P M, Clarke R L, ter Haar G R and Lh R 1998 Ultrasound in Med. Biol. 24 1489
|
[29] |
Takegami K and Kaneko Y 2004 Ultrasound Med. Biol. 30 1419
|
[30] |
Kreider W, Yuldashev P V, Sapozhnikov O A, Farr N, Partanen A, Bailey M R and Khokhlova V A 2013 IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelec.Freq. Contr. 60 1683
|
[31] |
Zhu X, Zhou L, Zhang D and Gong X 2005 Chin. Phys. 14 1594
|
[32] |
Yuldashev P V and Khokhlova V A 2011 Acoust. Phys. 57 334
|
[33] |
Curra F P, Mourad P D, Khokhlova V A, Cleveland R O and Crum L A 2000 IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelec. Freq. Contr. 47 1077
|
[34] |
Soneson J E and Myers M R 2010 IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelec. Freq. Contr. 57 2450
|
[35] |
Myers M R and Soneson J E 2009 J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 126 425
|
[36] |
Soneson J E and Myers M R 2007 J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 122 2526
|
[37] |
Zhang C, Cao H, Li Q, Tu J, Guo X, Liu Z and Zhang D 2013 Ultrasound Med. Biol. 39 161
|
[38] |
Sun T, Jia N, Zhang D and Xu D 2012 J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 131 4358
|
[39] |
Guo G, Lu L, Yin L, TuJ, Guo X,Wu J, Xu D and Zhang D 2014 Phys. Med. Biol. 59 6729
|
[40] |
Shehata I A 2012 Eur. J. Radiology 81 534
|
[41] |
Okita K, Sugiyama K, Shu T and Matsumto Y 2013 J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 134 1576
|
[42] |
Liu Z, Fan T, Guo X and Zhang D 2012 J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 131 3363
|
[43] |
Bessonova O and Wilkens V 2013 J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 134 4213
|
[44] |
Chen T, Fan T, Zhang W, Qiu Y, Tu J, Guo X and Zhang D 2014 J. Appl. Phys. 115 114902
|
[45] |
Zhang L, Wang X, Liu X and Gong X 2015 Chin. Phys. B 24 321
|
[46] |
Cheng K, Wu R, Liu X, Liu J, Gong X and Wu J 2015 Chin. Phys. B 24 267
|
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|